Quinlan Elizabeth
Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Jul;31(5):625-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01167.x. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
This study is set against the backdrop of the evolving order of a health care system in a province implementing a set of concurrent reforms. The study investigates how 'knowledge work' of multi-disciplinary health care teams is actually done and how it is co-ordinated across sites. Knowledge work involves three processes: the creation of new knowledge during the transfer of knowledge, in the context of the application of knowledge to their collective clinical decision-making. Institutional ethnography is used to explore the social and institutional forces that shape the knowledge work of health care providers in and across multi-disciplinary teams by way of examining how the texts trans-locally organise the formation and functioning of multi-disciplinary teams. The study confirms that in the course of their collective clinical decision-making, teams' dialogical exchange facilitates the articulation of tacit knowledge and opens up the communicative space for the creation of new knowledge. In addition to this confirmatory finding, the study contributes to the existing health-related knowledge management by illustrating the importance of the social, communicative aspects of the knowledge processes, and in particular, the relationship between knowledge and the social organisation of power.
本研究以某省正在实施一系列同步改革的医疗保健系统不断演变的秩序为背景。该研究调查了多学科医疗团队的“知识工作”实际是如何开展的,以及如何在不同地点之间进行协调。知识工作涉及三个过程:在知识转移过程中创造新知识,在将知识应用于集体临床决策的背景下创造新知识。制度民族志通过研究文本如何在跨地区组织多学科团队的形成和运作,来探索塑造多学科团队内外医疗保健提供者知识工作的社会和制度力量。该研究证实,在集体临床决策过程中,团队的对话交流有助于隐性知识的表达,并为新知识的创造开辟了交流空间。除了这一验证性发现外,该研究还通过阐明知识过程中社会、交流方面的重要性,特别是知识与权力社会组织之间的关系,为现有的健康相关知识管理做出了贡献。