Kweka Eliningaya J, Mwang'onde Beda J, Kimaro Epiphania, Msangi Shandala, Massenga Charles P, Mahande Aneth M
Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, Division of Livestock and Human Diseases Vector Control, Arusha, Tanzania.
Malar J. 2009 Apr 25;8:82. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-82.
Malaria vector sampling is the best method for understanding the vector dynamics and infectivity; thus, disease transmission seasonality can be established. There is a need to protecting humans involved in the sampling of disease vectors during surveillance or in control programmes. In this study, human landing catch, two cow odour baited resting boxes and an unbaited resting box were evaluated as vector sampling tools in an area with a high proportion of Anopheles arabiensis, as the major malaria vector.
Three resting boxes were evaluated against human landing catch. Two were baited with cow odour, while the third was unbaited. The inner parts of the boxes were covered with black cloth materials. Experiments were arranged in latin-square design. Boxes were set in the evening and left undisturbed; mosquitoes were collected at 06:00 am the next morning, while human landing catch was done overnight.
A total of 9,558 An. arabiensis mosquitoes were collected. 17.5% (N = 1668) were collected in resting box baited with cow body odour, 42.5% (N = 4060) in resting box baited with cow urine, 15.1% (N = 1444) in unbaited resting box and 24.9% (N = 2386) were collected by human landing catch technique. In analysis, the house positions had no effect on the density of mosquitoes caught (DF = 3, F = 0.753, P = 0.387); the sampling technique had significant impact on the caught mosquitoes densities (DF = 3, F 37. 944, P < 0.001).
Odour-baited resting boxes have shown the possibility of replacing the existing traditional method (human landing catch) for sampling malaria vectors in areas with a high proportion of An. arabiensis as malaria vectors. Further evaluations of fermented urine and longevity of the urine odour still need to be investigated.
疟疾媒介采样是了解媒介动态和感染性的最佳方法;因此,可以确定疾病传播的季节性。在监测或控制项目中,有必要保护参与疾病媒介采样的人员。在本研究中,在以阿拉伯按蚊为主要疟疾媒介的比例较高的地区,对人饵诱捕法、两个用牛粪气味诱饵的休息箱和一个未诱饵的休息箱作为媒介采样工具进行了评估。
将三个休息箱与人类诱饵诱捕法进行评估。其中两个用牛粪气味诱饵,第三个未诱饵。箱内部分用黑色布料覆盖。实验采用拉丁方设计。箱子在晚上设置好后不打扰;第二天早上6点收集蚊子,而人饵诱捕法在夜间进行。
共收集到9558只阿拉伯按蚊。17.5%(N = 1668)在用牛体气味诱饵的休息箱中收集到,42.5%(N = 4060)在用牛尿诱饵的休息箱中收集到,15.1%(N = 1444)在未诱饵的休息箱中收集到,24.9%(N = 2386)通过人饵诱捕技术收集到。在分析中,房屋位置对捕获蚊子的密度没有影响(自由度 = 3,F = 0.753,P = 0.387);采样技术对捕获蚊子的密度有显著影响(自由度 = 3,F = 37.944,P < 0.001)。
气味诱饵休息箱已显示出在以阿拉伯按蚊为疟疾媒介比例较高的地区替代现有传统方法(人饵诱捕法)进行疟疾媒介采样的可能性。仍需进一步研究发酵尿液和尿液气味的持久性。