Preuss T M, Goldman-Rakic P S
Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
J Comp Neurol. 1991 Aug 22;310(4):429-74. doi: 10.1002/cne.903100402.
As the first part of a comparative investigation of primate frontal cortex, we compared the frontal architectonic organization of Galago, a small-brained, strepsirhine (or "prosimian") primate, to that of an anthropoid primate, Macaca, by using myelin- and Nissl-stained material. We were able to distinguish many more areas in both taxa than have been recognized in most previous studies of the primate frontal lobe. In particular, we were able to subdivide many of the areas shown in the commonly cited architectonic map of Walker (J. Comp. Neurol. 73:59-86, 1940). Delineation of areas was greatly facilitated by the use of the Gallyas technique for staining myelin. The areal organization of much of frontal cortex (specifically, the premotor, orbital, and medial regions) appears to be very similar in Galago and Macaca. In these regions, we were able to recognize the same complement of areas in both taxa, with few exceptions. In the granular frontal cortex (GFC), by contrast, we were able to distinguish about twice as many areas in Macaca as in Galago. For most of the GFC areas of Galago, there are architectonically similar areas in Macaca; the areas shared by both taxa correspond mainly to the arcuate and superior areas of Macaca (i.e., the region encompassed by Walker's areas 45, 8A, and 8B). However, there are many additional, more rostral, areas in Macaca for which there are no obvious homologues in Galago. In particular, Galago lacks cortex resembling the distinctive, lightly myelinated cortex of the Macaca principal sulcus (Walker's area 46 and its subdivisions). Our results are difficult to reconcile with the view that frontal lobe organization varies little across taxa. Rather, they suggest that granular frontal cortex underwent considerable change during primate evolution, including the addition of new areas in anthropoids.
作为对灵长类动物额叶皮层进行比较研究的第一部分,我们通过使用髓鞘染色和尼氏染色材料,比较了小脑量的原猴亚目(或“原猴”)灵长类动物伽勒戈(Galago)与类人猿灵长类动物猕猴(Macaca)的额叶结构组织。与大多数先前对灵长类动物额叶的研究相比,我们在这两个分类群中能够区分出更多的区域。特别是,我们能够细分沃克(Walker,《比较神经学杂志》73:59 - 86,1940)常用的结构图谱中所示的许多区域。使用加利亚斯(Gallyas)髓鞘染色技术极大地促进了区域的划分。伽勒戈和猕猴额叶皮层的大部分区域(特别是运动前区、眶区和内侧区)的区域组织似乎非常相似。在这些区域,我们能够在两个分类群中识别出相同的区域组合,几乎没有例外。相比之下,在颗粒状额叶皮层(GFC)中,我们在猕猴中能够区分出的区域数量大约是伽勒戈的两倍。对于伽勒戈的大多数GFC区域,猕猴中有结构上相似的区域;两个分类群共有的区域主要对应于猕猴的弓形区和上区(即沃克区域45、8A和8B所涵盖的区域)。然而,猕猴中有许多额外的、更靠前的区域,在伽勒戈中没有明显的同源区域。特别是,伽勒戈缺乏类似于猕猴主沟独特的、轻度髓鞘化皮层(沃克区域46及其细分区域)的皮层。我们的结果很难与额叶组织在不同分类群中变化不大的观点相协调。相反,它们表明颗粒状额叶皮层在灵长类动物进化过程中经历了相当大的变化,包括在类人猿中增加了新的区域。