Liu Yan, Wen Qian-Jun, Yin You, Lu Xiao-Tong, Pu Shu-Hong, Tian Huai-Ping, Lou Yue-Fen, Tang Yue-Nian, Jiang Xin, Lu Gen-Sheng, Zhang Jian
Department of Pharmacy, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 4.
Many studies have reported the association between the FASLG -844T/C polymorphism and cancer risk, but the data are remaining controversial. A pooled analysis was performed to assess this relationship comprehensively. Medline, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched, and data were extracted and cross-checked independently by three authors. A total of 18 published studies including 22389 subjects were involved in this analysis. Overall, the -844C allele was associated with a significantly increased cancer risk (for CC versus TT: OR=1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-1.45; for CC+TC versus TT: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.01-1.30; for CC versus TT+TC: OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.05-1.38). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly elevated risks were found among Asians (for CC versus TT: OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.37-1.89; for CC+TC versus TT: OR=1.36, 95% CI=1.16-1.60; for CC versus TT+TC: OR=1.44, 95% CI=1.22-1.70). In the subgroup analysis by study design, significantly increased risks were found among population-based case-control studies (for CC versus TT: OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.06-1.84; for CC+TC versus TT: OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.01-1.55; for CC versus TT+TC: OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.06-1.61). These findings indicate that the FASLG -844C allele is emerging as a low-penetrant cancer susceptibility allele for cancer development. However, more comprehensive understanding of the association would certainly have an immense prospect in the promising field of individualised preventive care.
