• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助下高位直肠癌前切除术的长期发病率和肿瘤学结局:一项前瞻性随机试验的十年结果

Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial.

作者信息

Ng Simon S M, Leung Ka Lau, Lee Janet F Y, Yiu Raymond Y C, Li Jimmy C M, Hon Sophie S F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):558-66. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ec20c.

DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ec20c
PMID:19404053
Abstract

PURPOSE

We have previously reported the five-year results of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for cancer of the upper rectum and rectosigmoid junction. The aim of this follow-up study is to report on the long-term morbidity and ten-year oncologic outcomes among the subgroup of patients with upper rectal cancer.

METHODS

From September 1993 to October 2002, 153 patients with upper rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either laparoscopic-assisted (n = 76) or open (n = 77) anterior resection. Patients were last followed up in December 2007. Long-term morbidity, survival, and disease-free interval were prospectively recorded. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

The demographic data of the two groups were comparable. More patients in the open group developed adhesion-related bowel obstruction requiring hospitalization (P = 0.001) and intervention. The overall long-term morbidity rate was also significantly higher in the open group (P = 0.012). After curative resection, the probabilities of cancer-specific survival at ten years of the laparoscopic-assisted and open groups were 83.5 percent and 78.0 percent, respectively (P = 0.595), and their probabilities of being disease-free at ten years were 82.9 percent and 80.4 percent, respectively (P = 0.698).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer is associated with fewer long-term complications and similar ten-year oncologic outcomes when compared with open surgery.

摘要

目的

我们之前报告了一项比较腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗上段直肠癌及直肠乙状结肠交界处癌的随机试验的五年结果。这项随访研究的目的是报告上段直肠癌患者亚组的长期发病率和十年肿瘤学结局。

方法

从1993年9月至2002年10月,153例上段直肠癌患者被随机分配接受腹腔镜辅助手术(n = 76)或开放手术(n = 77)进行前切除术。患者最后一次随访时间为2007年12月。前瞻性记录长期发病率、生存率和无病间期。数据按意向性分析原则进行分析。

结果

两组的人口统计学数据具有可比性。开放手术组有更多患者发生需要住院治疗(P = 0.001)和干预的粘连相关肠梗阻。开放手术组的总体长期发病率也显著更高(P = 0.012)。根治性切除术后,腹腔镜辅助手术组和开放手术组十年的癌症特异性生存率分别为83.5%和78.0%(P = 0.595),十年无病生存率分别为82.9%和80.4%(P = 0.698)。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜辅助上段直肠癌前切除术的长期并发症更少,十年肿瘤学结局相似。

相似文献

1
Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助下高位直肠癌前切除术的长期发病率和肿瘤学结局:一项前瞻性随机试验的十年结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):558-66. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ec20c.
2
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2418-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
3
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
4
Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases.直肠癌的腹腔镜切除术:来自579例病例的经验教训。
Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):82-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e418a.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌:长期肿瘤学结果
Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511.
6
Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.对非早期直肠癌患者进行腹腔镜与开放手术切除的结果,最短随访时间为四年。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Sep-Oct;49(47):1185-90.
7
[Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery--after ten years and 350 operations].[腹腔镜结肠和直肠手术——十年及350例手术后]
Harefuah. 2007 Mar;146(3):176-80, 247-8.
8
Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.直肠腺癌腹腔镜前切除术的结果:157例回顾性分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.020.
9
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.
10
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Incisional hernia incidence following laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术切口疝发生率:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 30;29(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03347-2.
2
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
3
Long-term survival and functional outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for clinical stage I ultra-low rectal cancers located within 5 cm of the anal verge: A prospective phase II trial (Ultimate trial).
距肛缘5 cm以内的临床I期超低位直肠癌腹腔镜手术的长期生存及功能结局:一项前瞻性II期试验(终极试验)
Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;281(2):304-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006290.
4
Economic Consequences of Surgery for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Population-Based Study.粘连性小肠梗阻手术的经济后果:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Feb 25;2023:1844690. doi: 10.1155/2023/1844690. eCollection 2023.
5
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
6
Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer - A population-based nationwide noninferiority study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果 - 一项基于人群的全国性非劣效性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;24(11):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/codi.16204. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Cost-effectiveness of the prevention of adhesions and adhesive small bowel obstruction after colorectal surgery with adhesion barriers: a modelling study.防粘连屏障预防结直肠手术后粘连和粘连性小肠梗阻的成本效益:建模研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug 16;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0261-2. eCollection 2019.
8
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的短期和长期结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(50):e13704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013704.
9
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy oriented by superior mesenteric artery for right colon cancer: efficacy evaluation with a match-controlled analysis.肠系膜上动脉定位下腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌:配对对照分析的疗效评估
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Oct 30;10:5157-5170. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S178148. eCollection 2018.
10
The risk factors for benign small bowel obstruction following curative resection in patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者根治性切除术后良性小肠梗阻的危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct 22;16(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1510-7.