Diener E, Colvin C R, Pavot W G, Allman A
University of Illinois, Department of Psychology, Champaign 61820.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):492-503.
Recent research indicates that happiness, or affective well-being, is related primarily to the frequency, not to the intensity, of positive affect (PA). The question arises as to why intense positive affect (PI) is not a larger contributor to subjective well-being. Whether processes that yield PI also produce intense negative affect was examined. Studies 1 and 2 suggested that cognitive mechanisms that amplify or dampen affect can carry over from positive to negative events. Study 3 demonstrated that, because of judgment mechanisms, an extremely positive event can make other events less positive. Study 4 revealed that naturally occurring intensely positive experiences are often preceded by negative ones. Study 5 suggested that the more persons valence success at a task, the happier they will be if they succeed, but unhappier if they fail. The 5 studies reveal that intense positive experiences may sometimes have costs that counterbalance their desirable nature.
近期研究表明,幸福或情感幸福主要与积极情绪(PA)的频率相关,而非强度。于是就产生了一个问题,即为什么强烈的积极情绪(PI)对主观幸福感的贡献不大。研究了产生PI的过程是否也会产生强烈的消极情绪。研究1和研究2表明,放大或抑制情绪的认知机制可以从积极事件延续到消极事件。研究3表明,由于判断机制,一个极其积极的事件会使其他事件变得不那么积极。研究4显示,自然发生的强烈积极体验往往之前会有消极体验。研究5表明,人们对一项任务的成功评价越高,如果成功他们就会越幸福,但如果失败就会越不幸福。这5项研究表明,强烈的积极体验有时可能会有代价,抵消其令人向往的性质。