Fredman Lisa, Doros Gheorghe, Ensrud Kristine E, Hochberg Marc C, Cauley Jane A
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jul 15;170(2):203-10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp102. Epub 2009 May 14.
It is unknown whether caregivers who perform more caregiving tasks have a greater decline in health from higher stress or less decline because of better health, staying active, or psychological factors. This 1999-2004 US study examined caregiving intensity and 2-year change in performance-based functioning among 901 elderly women from the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures sample. Caregivers were categorized as high (n = 167) or low (n = 166) intensity based on how many activities of daily living they performed for the care recipient. Caregiving intensity status and physical performance score (sum of quartiles of walking pace, grip strength, and chair-stand speed; range, 0-9) were assessed at baseline and at 2 annual follow-up interviews. At baseline, high-intensity caregivers reported the most stress but had the best physical functioning; noncaregivers (n = 568) had the poorest physical functioning (adjusted scores = 5.09 vs. 4.54, P = 0.03). Low-intensity caregivers declined more than noncaregivers over 2 years, but high-intensity caregivers did not (adjusted difference = -0.33, P = 0.07 vs. 0.03, P = 0.89). Among respondents with the same caregiving status at baseline and 1-year interviews, high-intensity caregivers maintained the highest physical performance throughout follow-up. Higher levels of physical performance persisted over 2 years among high-intensity caregivers, which did not support the traditional stress hypothesis.
承担更多照料任务的照料者,是会因压力增大而健康状况下降得更厉害,还是会因健康状况较好、保持活跃或心理因素而下降得较少,目前尚不清楚。这项1999 - 2004年的美国研究,对来自骨质疏松性骨折照料者研究样本中的901名老年女性的照料强度以及基于表现的功能在两年内的变化进行了考察。照料者根据其为受照料者进行的日常生活活动数量,被分为高强度组(n = 167)或低强度组(n = 166)。在基线以及两次年度随访访谈时,对照料强度状态和身体表现评分(步行速度、握力和从椅子上站起速度的四分位数总和;范围为0 - 9)进行了评估。在基线时,高强度照料者报告的压力最大,但身体功能最佳;非照料者(n = 568)的身体功能最差(调整后分数分别为5.09和4.54,P = 0.03)。在两年时间里,低强度照料者的身体功能下降幅度比非照料者更大,但高强度照料者并非如此(调整后差异分别为 - 0.33,P = 0.07与0.03,P = 0.89)。在基线和一年期访谈时照料状态相同的受访者中,高强度照料者在整个随访期间保持了最高的身体表现。高强度照料者在两年时间里一直保持较高的身体表现水平,这并不支持传统的压力假设。