• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜缝合训练中我们需要多少专家?

How much do we need experts during laparoscopic suturing training?

机构信息

Centre for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2755-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0498-z. Epub 2009 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0498-z
PMID:19444512
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Because of the complex nature of laparoscopic suturing, numerous curricula have been developed to overcome the steep learning curve in a patient-free environment. Distributed training leads to better acquisition and retention of skill compared with massed training. However, this requires considerable time commitment of experts that supervise these training sessions. This study investigates the possibility of replacing expert supervision by structured training with video demonstrations and peer feedback.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of two balanced groups of ten senior medical students with minimal experience in laparoscopy. The control group trained with continuous expert feedback while for the experimental group only video demonstrations and external feedback from peers were available. Training was completed when a previously determined expert level was achieved on two consecutive attempts (proficiency criterion). Students were tested on their suturing skills 1 week after the training as well as after 4 months. A composite score assessing quality and quantity of suturing performance was used. Data are shown as median (interquartile range, IQR).

RESULTS

Students' performance improved more than 200% after training. Learning curves did not differ between groups (p = 0.28). One week after training, scores were 192 s (IQR 65 s) for the control and 190 s (IQR 27 s) for the experimental group (p = 0.63). After 4 months this was 223 s (IQR 88 s) and 220 s (IQR 37 s), respectively (p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Both training methods are very efficient at improving laparoscopic suturing skills and provide excellent skill retention. We therefore conclude that structured training with video demonstrations and peer feedback can replace expert supervision to teach laparoscopic suturing skills to novices. This will facilitate practical organization of skills training.

摘要

简介

由于腹腔镜缝合的复杂性,已经开发出许多课程来克服无患者环境下的陡峭学习曲线。与集中培训相比,分布式培训可以更好地获得和保留技能。然而,这需要专家们投入大量的时间来监督这些培训课程。本研究探讨了通过视频演示和同伴反馈替代专家监督进行结构化培训的可能性。

材料和方法

研究人群由两组经验最少的十名高级医学生组成,每组各十名。对照组在连续专家反馈的情况下进行训练,而实验组仅可获得视频演示和来自同伴的外部反馈。当连续两次尝试达到先前确定的专家水平(熟练标准)时,培训即完成。学生在培训后 1 周以及 4 个月后进行缝合技能测试。使用评估缝合性能质量和数量的综合评分。数据显示为中位数(四分位距,IQR)。

结果

学生的表现经过培训后提高了 200%以上。两组的学习曲线没有差异(p = 0.28)。培训后 1 周,对照组的得分为 192 秒(IQR 65 秒),实验组的得分为 190 秒(IQR 27 秒)(p = 0.63)。4 个月后,这分别为 223 秒(IQR 88 秒)和 220 秒(IQR 37 秒)(p = 0.60)。

结论

两种培训方法都非常有效地提高了腹腔镜缝合技能,并提供了出色的技能保留。因此,我们得出结论,通过视频演示和同伴反馈进行结构化培训可以替代专家监督,向新手传授腹腔镜缝合技能。这将有助于更实际地组织技能培训。

相似文献

1
How much do we need experts during laparoscopic suturing training?腹腔镜缝合训练中我们需要多少专家?
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2755-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0498-z. Epub 2009 May 15.
2
Does the advanced training in laparoscopic suturing enhance laparoscopic suturing skill beyond fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery?高级腹腔镜缝合培训是否能超越腹腔镜手术的基本原理,提高腹腔镜缝合技能?
Surgery. 2021 Oct;170(4):1125-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.041. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Maintenance training for laparoscopic suturing: the quest for the perfect timing and training model: a randomized trial.腹腔镜缝合的维持训练:寻找完美的时机和训练模型:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2981-9. Epub 2013 May 10.
4
Peer coaching to teach faculty surgeons an advanced laparoscopic skill: A randomized controlled trial.同伴辅导教学医院外科医生一项先进的腹腔镜技术:一项随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1392-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.032. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
5
Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition.触觉反馈对腹腔镜手术技能习得的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1128-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2011-8. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
6
The effect of verbal feedback, video feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.口头反馈、视频反馈和自我评估对新手腹腔镜内缝合技能的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3787-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07871-3. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
The impact of aptitude on the learning curve for laparoscopic suturing.能力对腹腔镜缝合学习曲线的影响。
Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.037. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills.一项比较学员主导的虚拟现实模拟训练与箱式训练器在腹腔镜缝合技能习得方面的随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Mar;40(3):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.开发一种用于腹腔镜缝合和体内打结技术技能的客观结构化评估方法。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
10
Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective.初步的腹腔镜基本技能训练可以缩短腹腔镜缝合的学习曲线,并且具有成本效益。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):436-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Contribution of simulation in paediatric laparoscopic surgery: improving suturing skills before performing a laparoscopic procedure in children.模拟在小儿腹腔镜手术中的作用:在对儿童进行腹腔镜手术前提高缝合技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1408. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06346-6.
2
Findings Favor Haptics Feedback in Virtual Simulation Surgical Education: An Updated Systematic and Scoping Review.研究结果支持触觉反馈在虚拟仿真手术教学中的应用:一项更新的系统评价和范围综述。
Surg Innov. 2024 Jun;31(3):331-341. doi: 10.1177/15533506241238263. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Training residents in minimally invasive surgery; confirming competence or hoping for the best?

本文引用的文献

1
How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture?学习缝合需要多少反馈?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1614-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9645-6. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
2
Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training.有限的反馈和视频教程可优化腹腔镜模拟器训练期间的学习和资源利用。
Surgery. 2007 Aug;142(2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.009.
3
Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback.
培训住院医师进行微创手术:确认能力还是寄望于最好的结果?
Vet Surg. 2022 Jul;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):O5-O11. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13850.
4
An Educational Network for Surgical Education Supported by Gamification Elements: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一个由游戏化元素支持的外科教育网络:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 14;9(12):e21273. doi: 10.2196/21273.
5
Self-directed training with e-learning using the first-person perspective for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a randomised controlled trial : Learning from the surgeon's real perspective.使用第一人称视角的电子学习进行自我导向训练,用于腹腔镜缝合和打结:一项随机对照试验:从外科医生的真实视角学习。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06842-7. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Dominant hand, non-dominant hand, or both? The effect of pre-training in hand-eye coordination upon the learning curve of laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying.优势手、非优势手还是两者皆用?手眼协调预训练对腹腔镜体内打结学习曲线的影响。
Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1015-3. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using barbed sutures for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure: A safe option to reduce operational times.使用倒刺缝线进行网片固定和腹膜闭合的腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术:减少手术时间的安全选择。
Urol Ann. 2017 Apr-Jun;9(2):159-165. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_161_16.
8
Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.腹腔镜缝合和打结心理运动及视觉空间技能的序贯学习——一项随机对照试验“鞋盒研究” DRKS00008668
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):893-901. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1421-4. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial "The shoebox study".腹腔镜缝合和打结的心理运动技能与视觉空间技能的序贯学习——一项随机对照试验“鞋盒研究”的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jan 7;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1145-8.
10
Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine.腹腔镜下取出嵌入肠道的移位宫内节育器。
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00122.
向医学生教授缝合和打结技能:一项比较基于计算机的视频教学与(同步和总结性)专家反馈的随机对照研究。
Surgery. 2007 Apr;141(4):442-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.012. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
4
Surgical skill acquisition with self-directed practice using computer-based video training.通过基于计算机的视频训练进行自主练习来获得手术技能。
Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.003.
5
Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial.外科手术技能教学:何种练习能臻于完美?一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):400-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234808.85789.6a.
6
Training junior operative residents in laparoscopic suturing skills is feasible and efficacious.培训初级住院手术医师的腹腔镜缝合技能是可行且有效的。
Surgery. 2006 Jun;139(6):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.12.010.
7
Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention.技能维持:持续的模拟训练对腹腔镜技能保持的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):599-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.12.018.
8
Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training.基于熟练程度的腹腔镜模拟器训练后的技能保持情况。
Surgery. 2005 Aug;138(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.002.
9
Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room.使用性能目标进行腹腔镜缝合的模拟器训练可转化至手术室。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021.
10
Does setting specific goals and providing feedback during training result in better acquisition of laparoscopic skills?在培训过程中设定具体目标并提供反馈是否会带来更好的腹腔镜技能习得效果?
Am Surg. 2004 Jan;70(1):35-9.