Haramoto Eiji, Katayama Hiroyuki, Utagawa Etsuko, Ohgaki Shinichiro
University of Yamanashi, Takeda, Kofu, Japan.
J Virol Methods. 2009 Sep;160(1-2):206-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 May 15.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of virus concentration methods to detect human norovirus (HuNoV) in water. One conventional virus concentration method using an electropositive filter (1MDS-method) and two methods developed by our research group using an electronegative filter (Mg-method and Al-method) were subjected to recovery tests of the HuNoV strain GII.4, which was obtained from a diarrhea patient, and poliovirus (PV) type 1 inoculated into 5 kinds of water samples. The mean recovery yields of HuNoV by the Mg-method, determined by real-time PCR, were 186%, 80%, 167%, 15%, and 39% for MilliQ water, tap water, bottled water, river water, and pond water, respectively (n=2 each), which were generally comparable to those of PV. A similar trend was observed for the Al-method (n=8 in total), suggesting that both Mg- and Al-methods can be appropriate for concentrating HuNoVs from water samples. Unlike these two methods, no clear correlation was found between the recovery of HuNoV and PV by the 1MDS-method (n=6 in total). This study is significant because it provides observations on the use of virus concentration methods for the detection of uncultivable HuNoV in water samples.
本研究的目的是评估病毒浓缩方法在检测水中人诺如病毒(HuNoV)方面的适用性。使用正电滤器的一种传统病毒浓缩方法(1MDS法)以及我们研究小组开发的使用负电滤器的两种方法(Mg法和Al法),对从腹泻患者获得的HuNoV GII.4毒株和接种到5种水样中的1型脊髓灰质炎病毒(PV)进行了回收率测试。通过实时PCR测定,Mg法对HuNoV的平均回收率在超纯水、自来水、瓶装水、河水和池塘水中分别为186%、80%、167%、15%和39%(每种n = 2),总体上与PV的回收率相当。Al法也观察到类似趋势(总共n = 8),表明Mg法和Al法都适合从水样中浓缩HuNoV。与这两种方法不同,1MDS法(总共n = 6)的HuNoV和PV回收率之间未发现明显相关性。本研究具有重要意义,因为它提供了关于使用病毒浓缩方法检测水样中不可培养的HuNoV的观察结果。