Armstrong J
Psychology Department, Towson State University, Maryland.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1991 Sep;14(3):533-46.
The reader familiar with the borderline literature may see a correspondence between certain of our MPD/DD Rorschach results and typical borderline characteristics. Most notably, both groups reason and view others in unusual but not psychotic ways and demonstrate certain difficulties in affect integration. On the other hand, the MPD/DD group exhibits many attributes that contradict predictions one would make from a borderline perspective, and which support Kluft's assertion that the majority of these patients have a more complex and structured personality system. Rather than holding oversimplified attitudes, they are attuned to the subtleties of experience. Their generally introversive personality style reflects a capacity for internalization, for ideational organization of anxiety, for taking analytic distance from themselves, and for viewing and relating to others in a complex and empathetic fashion. To return to our metaphor of the explorer, we can conclude that the borderline personality concept gives us too broad and blurred a view of the MPD/DD terrain. It lacks the level of specificity needed to describe the test phenomena that appear on these MPD/DD Rorschachs. The special test instructions, behavior ratings of extra-test dissociative phenomena, and the posttest process questions enable us to see that although at gross level certain vulnerabilities resemble borderline characteristics, the processes underlying these phenomena are quite distinct. Moreover, unexpected areas of strength and maturity also exist. These findings suggest that we are not viewing a developmental arrest, but rather, are seeing the signs of what developmental psychologists call a "strange" development i.e., an atypical developmental pathway created by unusual interactions with the world. It may well be that much of the difficulty in establishing the validity of BPD test criteria has been due to the unwitting inclusion of DD patients within these studies. If so, the distinction between borderline and dissociative test characteristics will lead to more accurate and refined studies of both groups. The concept of PTSD has been a particularly useful dimension for elucidating MPD test phenomena. As we further investigate commonalities and differences within the MPD/DD continuum, it will be interesting to examine in what way the severity of these patients' PTSD relates to their personality characteristics, symptom patterns, and treatment response. The strength of psychological assessment has long been its ability to describe the organization of psychological processes to gain a detailed knowledge of the individual. As such, in the hands of well-trained clinicians, psychological assessment has been one of the most powerful tools for predicting long-term treatment outcome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
熟悉边缘性人格文献的读者可能会发现,我们的某些多重人格障碍/分离性身份障碍(MPD/DD)罗夏测试结果与典型的边缘性人格特征之间存在对应关系。最显著的是,这两组人都以不同寻常但并非精神病性的方式进行推理和看待他人,并且在情感整合方面表现出一定困难。另一方面,MPD/DD组展现出许多与从边缘性人格角度所做预测相矛盾的特质,这些特质支持了克洛夫特的论断,即这些患者中的大多数拥有更为复杂和结构化的人格系统。他们并非持有过于简单化的态度,而是能察觉到经验的微妙之处。他们普遍内向的人格风格反映出一种内化能力、对焦虑进行观念组织的能力、与自身保持分析性距离的能力,以及以复杂且具同理心的方式看待他人并与之建立关系的能力。回到我们将其比作探险家的隐喻,我们可以得出结论,边缘性人格概念让我们对MPD/DD领域的看法过于宽泛和模糊。它缺乏描述这些MPD/DD罗夏测试中出现的测试现象所需的具体程度。特殊的测试指导语、对测试外分离现象的行为评分以及测试后的过程问题使我们能够看到,尽管在总体层面某些易损性类似于边缘性人格特征,但这些现象背后的过程却截然不同。此外,还存在一些意外的优势和成熟领域。这些发现表明,我们看到的并非发育停滞,而是发展心理学家所称的“奇特”发展的迹象,即由与世界的异常互动所创造的非典型发展路径。很可能在确立边缘性人格障碍(BPD)测试标准有效性方面的诸多困难,很大程度上是由于在这些研究中无意中纳入了分离性身份障碍患者。如果是这样,区分边缘性人格和分离性测试特征将导致对这两组人群进行更准确和精细的研究。创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)概念在阐释MPD测试现象方面一直是一个特别有用的维度。当我们进一步探究MPD/DD连续体中的共性和差异时,考察这些患者PTSD的严重程度与他们的人格特征、症状模式及治疗反应之间的关系将很有趣。心理评估的优势长期以来在于其描述心理过程组织以详细了解个体的能力。因此,在训练有素的临床医生手中,心理评估一直是预测长期治疗结果最有力的工具之一。(摘要截选至400词)