Marmer S S, Fink D
University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1994 Dec;17(4):743-71.
This article has made a number of points that assert what is today a minority position within the fields of MPD/DID and BPD. We hope our views will stimulate attempts by others to rethink their positions and test our assertions, so that issues surrounding these two disorders can be sharpened. For the sake of the clarity of future work, we summarize in outline form the essence of our viewpoint. 1. BPD and MPD/DID have similar appearing symptoms, such as identity problems, unstable affect modulation, self-destructive behaviors, chaotic impulse control, and troubled interpersonal relationships, but they have decisive differences in underlying dynamics, process, and structure. 2. DSM tends to blur these two disorders by its emphasis on phenomenology over inner structure, thus fostering misleading conclusions when DSM criteria are used to test for comorbidity or overlap between BPD and MPD/DID. 3. BPD and MPD/DID are both described dynamically as using the defense of splitting, but we contend that the splitting in each disorder is fundamentally different from the splitting in the other. BPD uses a polarization form of splitting, whereas MPD/DID uses ego splitting or identity division. 4. Both disorders partake in the process of dissociation, but the quality of dissociation in BPD is a "low-tech" spaced out type, whereas that of MPD/DID is a "high-tech" waking dream. 5. BPD structure is also "low tech," with polarization of self, object, and relationship. MPD/DID structure is "high tech," with heavily symbolic, highly nuanced variations of self, object, and relationship. 6. Although both conditions have etiologic elements of trauma, BPD has a larger degree of developmental deficiency, with a failure to complete the task of entering a repression hierarchy of defenses. MPD/DID, by use of primary process-linked symbolic dissociation, is able to continue development to the repression hierarchy, although at a profound cost of simultaneous suspension of reality testing. BPD patients suffer from the rigid use of too few defenses; MPD/DID patients suffer from the obsolete use of too many defenses. 7. BPD patients grow up in homes in which overtly expressed aggression is more tolerated, or at least more openly experienced. MPD/DID patients grow up in homes in which the fact of aggression is kept a secret. This has consequences for the formation of psychic structure in each disorder.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本文提出了一些观点,这些观点在多重人格障碍/分离性身份识别障碍(MPD/DID)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)领域中属于少数派立场。我们希望我们的观点能促使其他人重新思考他们的立场并检验我们的论断,以便围绕这两种障碍的问题能更加清晰。为了未来研究的清晰性,我们以提纲形式总结我们观点的要点。1. BPD和MPD/DID有相似的症状表现,如身份问题、不稳定的情感调节、自我毁灭行为、混乱的冲动控制和困扰的人际关系,但它们在潜在动力、过程和结构上有决定性差异。2. 《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)倾向于通过强调现象学而忽视内在结构来模糊这两种障碍,因此当使用DSM标准来检测BPD和MPD/DID之间的共病或重叠时会得出误导性结论。3. BPD和MPD/DID在动态描述中都被认为使用了分裂防御,但我们认为每种障碍中的分裂与另一种障碍中的分裂根本不同。BPD使用的是两极分化形式的分裂,而MPD/DID使用的是自我分裂或身份分裂。4. 这两种障碍都参与了分离过程,但BPD中的分离性质是“低技术”的恍惚型,而MPD/DID中的分离性质是“高技术”的清醒梦境型。5. BPD的结构也是“低技术”的,自我、客体和关系两极分化。MPD/DID的结构是“高技术”的,自我、客体和关系有高度象征性、非常细微的变化。6. 虽然这两种情况都有创伤的病因因素,但BPD有更大程度的发育缺陷,未能完成进入防御抑制层级的任务。MPD/DID通过使用与初级过程相关的象征性分离,能够继续发展到抑制层级,尽管同时要付出暂停现实检验的沉重代价。BPD患者因过度 rigid 使用太少防御而受苦;MPD/DID患者因过时使用太多防御而受苦。7. BPD患者成长的家庭中,公开表达的攻击行为更被容忍,或者至少更容易公开体验到。MPD/DID患者成长的家庭中,攻击行为的事实被隐瞒。这对每种障碍中心理结构的形成都有影响。(摘要截选至400字)