Rasmussen Anne S, Berntsen Dorthe
Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):477-92. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.477.
Differences between positive and negative autobiographical memories are often explained with reference to hypothesized evolutionary functions. Generally, it has been proposed that autobiographical memory serves directive, self-, and social functions. However, the relationship between emotional valence and the three functions has never been studied. In Study 1, participants generated memories that mapped onto each of the three functions. Directive memories were dominated by negative emotion, whereas self- and social memories were dominated by positive emotion. In Study 2, participants generated their most positive and most negative memories, as well as their most frequent involuntary and most vivid flashbulb memories, and the three functions were measured through rating-scale questions. The directive function had the lowest ratings across all memory classes, but, consistent with the results of Study 1, positive memories were rated higher on the self- and social functions, whereas negative memories were rated higher on the directive function.
积极与消极自传体记忆之间的差异通常根据假设的进化功能来解释。一般而言,有人提出自传体记忆具有指导、自我和社会功能。然而,情绪效价与这三种功能之间的关系从未被研究过。在研究1中,参与者生成了映射到这三种功能的记忆。指导性记忆以消极情绪为主,而自我和社会记忆以积极情绪为主。在研究2中,参与者生成了他们最积极和最消极的记忆,以及他们最频繁的非自愿和最生动的闪光灯记忆,并通过评分量表问题来衡量这三种功能。在所有记忆类别中,指导功能的评分最低,但与研究1的结果一致,积极记忆在自我和社会功能方面的评分更高,而消极记忆在指导功能方面的评分更高。