Suppr超能文献

关于按需服用药物在精神科住院患者中的有效性的证据有限。

Limited evidence for the effectiveness of p.r.n. Medications among psychiatric inpatients.

作者信息

Srivastava Anil

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2009 May;15(3):193-201. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000351879.52883.10.

Abstract

The use of medications on a p.r.n. basis on psychiatric inpatient wards is common and widespread but without clear evidence of effectiveness. While individual studies have explored the use of p.r.n. medications in patients receiving scheduled psychotropic medications, no systematic review of the effectiveness of this use of p.r.n. medications has been done. A MEDLINE search was performed of all articles published in English between 1966 and November 2008. Studies were included only if they involved psychiatric patients and if they quantitatively explored the effectiveness of p.r.n. medications. Ten retrospective studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Among the studies involving adult inpatients, estimates of effectiveness, primarily in the management of agitation, were consistently moderately high, averaging approximately 75%. These studies mainly involved use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. Lower estimates of about 30% were obtained in studies involving non-adult inpatients who had few psychotic disorders and among whom there was only minimal use of p.r.n. benzodiazepines. The meaning of effectiveness was often unclear across these retrospective studies. It also appears that important outcome measures, such as duration of hospitalization, may not be affected. Administration of p.r.n. medication was also associated with a greater risk of adverse events. Future studies concerning use of p.r.n. medications in psychiatric patients should examine objective ratings of agitation, medication effects, and adverse events.

摘要

在精神科住院病房按需使用药物的情况很常见且普遍,但缺乏有效性的确切证据。虽然个别研究探讨了在接受定期精神药物治疗的患者中按需使用药物的情况,但尚未对这种按需使用药物的有效性进行系统综述。对1966年至2008年11月期间以英文发表的所有文章进行了MEDLINE检索。只有涉及精神科患者且定量探讨了按需使用药物有效性的研究才被纳入。确定了10项符合纳入标准的回顾性研究。在涉及成年住院患者的研究中,主要在控制激越方面的有效性估计始终处于中等偏高水平,平均约为75%。这些研究主要涉及抗精神病药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的使用。在涉及很少有精神障碍且很少按需使用苯二氮䓬类药物的非成年住院患者的研究中,有效性估计较低,约为30%。在这些回顾性研究中,有效性的含义往往不明确。似乎重要的结局指标,如住院时间,可能未受影响。按需给药还与更高的不良事件风险相关。未来关于精神科患者按需使用药物的研究应检查激越的客观评分、药物效果和不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验