• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对含有药品信息的网站的评估]

[Assessment of websites with information on medicines].

作者信息

Pernett Jaime Jiménez, Gutiérrez Jose Francisco García, Tamayo Clara Bermúdez, Castro Martha Milena Silva, Tuneu i Valls Laura

机构信息

Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2009 Jul;41(7):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2008.10.009
PMID:19464077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7022027/
Abstract

AIMS

To identify websites with information on medicines and assess, using experts, their adherence to codes of conduct and recommendations by the WHO.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study based on an ad hoc designed questionnaire (performed independently by 2 reviewers). The websites were identified by the Delphi technique (35 experts).

SETTING

Websites with information on medicines.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 35 websites selected by the Delphi technique. An acceptable level of stability was achieved in the third round (interquartile variability; <0.05).

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Responsibility, transparency and honesty, authorship of the information, content review policy, privacy and data protection policies, updated information and accessibility. A descriptive analysis of compliance was carried out and the kappa coefficient was estimated to evaluate the agreement between assessors (Fleiss's Criteria).

RESULTS

The National Prescribing Service Limited (NPS), PubMed, British Medical Journal, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of American Medical Association, The Lancet, Fisterra and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence stood out with an overall high fulfilment of the questionnaire. The updated information dimension was the lowest evaluation for the different websites.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the web sites evaluated varied widely. Although there are several websites, which are detailed in the article, with high overall scores.

摘要

目的

识别提供药品信息的网站,并利用专家评估这些网站对行为准则和世界卫生组织建议的遵守情况。

设计

基于专门设计的问卷进行的横断面研究(由2名评审员独立进行)。通过德尔菲技术(35名专家)确定网站。

地点

提供药品信息的网站。

参与者

通过德尔菲技术共选择了35个网站。在第三轮中达到了可接受的稳定性水平(四分位间距变异;<0.05)。

主要测量指标

责任、透明度与诚实、信息的作者身份、内容审核政策、隐私和数据保护政策、信息更新及可访问性。对合规情况进行描述性分析,并估计kappa系数以评估评估者之间的一致性(弗莱iss标准)。

结果

国家处方服务有限公司(NPS)、PubMed、《英国医学杂志》、《新英格兰医学杂志》、《美国医学会杂志》、《柳叶刀》、Fisterra和国家卫生与临床优化研究所总体上在问卷完成度方面表现突出。信息更新维度是对不同网站的最低评价。

结论

所评估网站的质量差异很大。尽管本文详细介绍了几个总体得分较高的网站。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of websites with information on medicines].[对含有药品信息的网站的评估]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Jul;41(7):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 May 22.
2
[Adherence to codes of conduct for biomedical information on the internet in useful websites for pharmacotherapy follow-up].[在用于药物治疗随访的有用网站上对互联网生物医学信息行为准则的遵守情况]
Gac Sanit. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):204-9. doi: 10.1157/13106802.
3
[Webliography of health for adolescents and young people].[青少年和年轻人健康网络文献目录]
Rev Calid Asist. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
4
Quality and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Information on Laser Treatments for Urinary Incontinence: What Is Available to Our Patients?公共可获取的激光治疗尿失禁信息的质量和可靠性:我们的患者能获得什么?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1524-1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.基于网络的骨关节炎信息质量:一项横断面研究。
Physiotherapy. 2018 Sep;104(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites.《2002年电子欧洲:健康相关网站质量标准》
J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec;4(3):E15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e15.
7
Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.长效可逆避孕措施相关网站质量:描述性横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0835-1.
8
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
A Clinical Tool (CUE-tool) for Health Care Professionals to Assess the Usability and Quality of the Content of Medical Information Websites: Electronic Delphi Study.一种临床工具(CUE 工具),用于医疗保健专业人员评估医学信息网站内容的可用性和质量:电子德尔菲研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e22668. doi: 10.2196/22668.
10
How to evaluate the quality of health related websites.如何评估与健康相关网站的质量。
Radiol Med. 2005 Mar;109(3):280-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Questionnaire of Food Education Content on School Catering Websites in Spain.验证西班牙学校餐饮网站食品教育内容问卷
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 20;19(6):3685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063685.
2
[Presence and adequacy of pharmaceutical preparations in the Spanish edition of Wikipedia].[维基百科西班牙语版中药物制剂的存在情况与充足性]
Aten Primaria. 2013 Feb;45(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
3
[The information about drugs on the Internet, a great step ahead].[互联网上有关药物的信息,向前迈出的一大步]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Jul;41(7):369-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.06.001.
4
[Drug information in Internet: necessary and improvable].[互联网中的药物信息:必要且有待改进]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Jul;41(7):367-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
[Adherence to codes of conduct for biomedical information on the internet in useful websites for pharmacotherapy follow-up].[在用于药物治疗随访的有用网站上对互联网生物医学信息行为准则的遵守情况]
Gac Sanit. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):204-9. doi: 10.1157/13106802.
2
[Social pharmacology of the information of prescription drugs on the internet].[互联网上处方药信息的社会药理学]
Med Clin (Barc). 2007 Apr 7;128(13):504-7. doi: 10.1157/13100939.
3
Women's autonomy and the evaluation of the information available on the Internet on hormone therapy after menopause.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;24(4):226-34. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200607000-00010.
4
Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet.网上搜索脊柱侧弯:互联网上可得信息的质量
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2695-700. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000188266.22041.c2.
5
Future directions for depicting credibility in health care web sites.
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.035. Epub 2005 Aug 25.
6
Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys.互联网健康信息搜索的影响、使用情况及结果:皮尤调查的多变量结果
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
7
Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use?评估万维网上健康信息质量的工具:我们的患者实际能用什么?
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.10.001.
8
Needs and use of drug information sources in community pharmacies: a questionnaire based survey in German-speaking Switzerland.
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Aug;26(4):197-202. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000035881.17853.e0.
9
Informing, advising, or persuading? An assessment of bone mineral density testing information from consumer health websites.告知、建议还是劝说?对消费者健康网站上骨密度检测信息的评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):156-66. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000935.
10
Quality of drug information on the World Wide Web and strategies to improve pages with poor information quality. An intervention study on pages about sildenafil.万维网上药物信息的质量以及改善信息质量欠佳页面的策略。一项关于西地那非页面的干预性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;57(1):80-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01954.x.