Lee Sei J, Sudore Rebecca L, Williams Brie A, Lindquist Karla, Chen Helen L, Covinsky Kenneth E
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Geriatrics, Bldg 1, Room 306, Box 181G, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jun;57(6):955-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02184.x. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
To determine whether the survival benefit associated with moderate alcohol use remains after accounting for nontraditional risk factors such as socioeconomic status (SES) and functional limitations.
Prospective cohort.
The Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative study of U.S. adults aged 55 and older.
Twelve thousand five hundred nineteen participants were enrolled in the 2002 wave of the HRS.
Participants were asked about their alcohol use, functional limitations (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility), SES (education, income, and wealth), psychosocial factors (depressive symptoms, social support, and the importance of religion), age, sex, race and ethnicity, smoking, obesity, and comorbidities. Death by December 31, 2006, was the outcome measure.
Moderate drinkers (1 drink/d) had a markedly more-favorable risk factor profile, with higher SES and fewer functional limitations. After adjusting for demographic factors, moderate drinking (vs no drinking) was strongly associated with less mortality (odds ratio (OR)=0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.40-0.62). When traditional risk factors (smoking, obesity, and comorbidities) were also adjusted for, the protective effect was slightly attenuated (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.46-0.72). When all risk factors including functional status and SES were adjusted for, the protective effect was markedly attenuated but still statistically significant (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.57-0.91).
Moderate drinkers have better risk factor profiles than nondrinkers, including higher SES and fewer functional limitations. Although these factors explain much of the survival advantage associated with moderate alcohol use, moderate drinkers maintain their survival advantage even after adjustment for these factors.
在考虑社会经济地位(SES)和功能受限等非传统风险因素后,确定适度饮酒与生存获益之间的关联是否依然存在。
前瞻性队列研究。
健康与退休研究(HRS),一项针对美国55岁及以上成年人的具有全国代表性的研究。
12519名参与者纳入了2002年HRS调查。
询问参与者饮酒情况、功能受限情况(日常生活活动、工具性日常生活活动和活动能力)、SES(教育程度、收入和财富)、心理社会因素(抑郁症状、社会支持和宗教信仰的重要性)、年龄、性别、种族和民族、吸烟、肥胖及合并症。以2006年12月31日前死亡作为结局指标。
适度饮酒者(每天1杯)具有明显更优的风险因素状况,SES更高且功能受限更少。在调整人口统计学因素后,适度饮酒(与不饮酒相比)与更低的死亡率密切相关(比值比(OR)=0.50,95%置信区间(CI)=0.40 - 0.62)。当同时调整传统风险因素(吸烟、肥胖和合并症)后,保护作用略有减弱(OR = 0.57,95% CI = 0.46 - 0.72)。当调整包括功能状态和SES在内的所有风险因素后,保护作用明显减弱但仍具有统计学意义(OR = 0.72,95% CI = 0.57 - 0.91)。
适度饮酒者比不饮酒者具有更好的风险因素状况,包括更高的SES和更少的功能受限。尽管这些因素解释了适度饮酒与生存优势之间的大部分关联,但即使在调整这些因素后,适度饮酒者仍保持其生存优势。