• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rescoring the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index: nothing new.重新计分美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数:并无新意。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(3):285-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.22. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
2
Two-year experience with the german-translated version of the NIH-CPSI in patients with CP/CPPS.NIH-CPSI德文翻译版本在CP/CPPS患者中的两年应用经验。
Urology. 2004 Jun;63(6):1027-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.002.
3
Reliability and validity of the National Institutes of Health: Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index in a Malaysian population.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数在马来西亚人群中的信度和效度。
World J Urol. 2006 Feb;24(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s00345-005-0037-z. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
4
National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) symptom evaluation in multinational cohorts of patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)在慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征多国患者队列中的症状评估。
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):953-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.042. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
5
Reliability and validity of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index questionnaire in the Turkish Population.土耳其人群中 NIH 慢性前列腺炎症状指数问卷的信度和效度。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Apr 30;51(2):501-507. doi: 10.3906/sag-2001-231.
6
The Italian version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数的意大利语版本。
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):805-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.12.025. Epub 2005 Jan 14.
7
The Estonian version of the National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数的爱沙尼亚语版本。
Andrologia. 2006 Jun;38(3):106-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2006.00723.x.
8
French-Canadian linguistic validation of the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数的法裔加拿大语语言学验证
Can J Urol. 2005 Oct;12(5):2816-23.
9
Erectile Dysfunction in Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Outcomes from a Multi-Center Study and Risk Factor Analysis in a Single Center.慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征中的勃起功能障碍:一项多中心研究的结果及单中心危险因素分析
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0153054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153054. eCollection 2016.
10
National institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index for Japanese men.日本男性的美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):74-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01636-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of external myofascial mobilisation in the management of male chronic pelvic pain of muscle spastic type: A retrospective study.体外肌筋膜松动术治疗肌肉痉挛型男性慢性盆腔疼痛的有效性:一项回顾性研究。
Arab J Urol. 2021 Jul 26;19(3):394-400. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1954414. eCollection 2021.
2
A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.一项关于国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数跨文化适应的系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 31;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01796-8.
3
The effect of biofeedback interventions on pain, overall symptoms, quality of life and physiological parameters in patients with pelvic pain : A systematic review.生物反馈干预对盆腔疼痛患者疼痛、总体症状、生活质量和生理参数的影响:系统评价。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Jan;134(Suppl 1):11-48. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01827-w. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Evaluation of the Sympathetic Skin Response in Men with Chronic Prostatitis: A Case-Control Study.慢性前列腺炎男性患者交感神经皮肤反应的评估:一项病例对照研究。
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 9;12:239-245. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S253101. eCollection 2020.
5
Readability Assessment of Commonly Used German Urological Questionnaires.常用德语泌尿外科问卷的可读性评估。
Curr Urol. 2019 Oct;13(2):87-93. doi: 10.1159/000499287. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a review of the literature.针灸治疗慢性前列腺炎-慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效:文献综述。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Dec;51(12):2093-2106. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02267-2. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Readability assessment of commonly used urological questionnaires.常用泌尿科问卷的可读性评估。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Sep;59(5):297-304. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.5.297. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
8
Chronic Pelvic Pain: Assessment, Evaluation, and Objectivation.慢性盆腔疼痛:评估、评价与客观化
Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:9472925. doi: 10.1155/2017/9472925. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Alfuzosin and symptoms of chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome.阿夫唑嗪与慢性前列腺炎-慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的症状
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 18;359(25):2663-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803240.
2
Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数阿拉伯语版本的效度和信度。
Urol Int. 2006;77(3):227-31. doi: 10.1159/000094814.
3
Responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI).美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)的反应性。
Qual Life Res. 2006 Mar;15(2):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1317-1.
4
Reliability and validity of the National Institutes of Health: Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index in a Malaysian population.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数在马来西亚人群中的信度和效度。
World J Urol. 2006 Feb;24(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s00345-005-0037-z. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
5
French-Canadian linguistic validation of the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数的法裔加拿大语语言学验证
Can J Urol. 2005 Oct;12(5):2816-23.
6
The Italian version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index.美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数的意大利语版本。
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):805-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.12.025. Epub 2005 Jan 14.
7
Ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind trial.环丙沙星或坦索罗辛治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征男性患者:一项随机双盲试验
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 19;141(8):581-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00005.
8
The Finnish version of The National Institutes Of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index correlates well with the visual pain scale: translation and results of a modified linguistic validation study.芬兰版美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数与视觉疼痛量表相关性良好:一项改良语言验证研究的翻译及结果
BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):251-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04313.x.
9
[A Japanese version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI, Okayama version) and the clinical evaluation of cernitin pollen extract for chronic non-bacterial prostatitis].[日本版美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI,冈山版)及舍尼通花粉提取物治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床评估]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2002 May;93(4):539-47. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.93.539.
10
The Spanish National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index: translation and linguistic validation.西班牙国立卫生研究院-慢性前列腺炎症状指数:翻译与语言验证
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1800-3.

重新计分美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数:并无新意。

Rescoring the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index: nothing new.

作者信息

Clemens J Q, Calhoun E A, Litwin M S, McNaughton-Collins M, Dunn R L, Crowley E M, Landis J R

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5330, USA.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(3):285-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.22. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2009.22
PMID:19488065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2736311/
Abstract

The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) is a commonly used 13-item questionnaire for the assessment of symptom severity in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). For each item, score ranges are 0-1 (6 items), 0-3 (2 items), 0-5 (3 items), 0-6 (1 item) and 0-10 (1 item). This scoring system is straightforward, but items with wider score ranges are de facto weighted more, which could adversely affect the performance characteristics of the questionnaire. We rescored the NIH-CPSI so that equal weights were assigned to each item, and compared the performance of the standard and rescored questionnaires using the original validation dataset. Both the original and revised versions of the scoring algorithm discriminated similarly among groups of men with CP (n=151), benign prostatic hyperplasia (n=149) and controls (n=134). The internal consistency of the questionnaire was slightly better with the revised scoring, but values with the standard scoring were sufficiently high (Cronbach's >or=0.80). We conclude that although the rescored NIH-CPSI provides better face validity than the standard scoring algorithm, it requires additional calculation efforts and yields only marginal improvements in performance.

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)是一种常用的包含13个条目的问卷,用于评估慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)男性患者的症状严重程度。每个条目的评分范围为0-1(6个条目)、0-3(2个条目)、0-5(3个条目)、0-6(1个条目)和0-10(1个条目)。这种评分系统很简单,但评分范围较宽的条目实际上权重更大,这可能会对问卷的性能特征产生不利影响。我们对NIH-CPSI重新评分,使每个条目具有相等的权重,并使用原始验证数据集比较了标准问卷和重新评分问卷的性能。评分算法的原始版本和修订版本在CP男性组(n=151)、良性前列腺增生组(n=149)和对照组(n=134)之间的区分能力相似。修订评分后问卷的内部一致性略好,但标准评分的数值也足够高(Cronbach's≥0.80)。我们得出结论,尽管重新评分的NIH-CPSI比标准评分算法具有更好的表面效度,但它需要额外的计算工作,并且在性能上仅产生微小的改进。