Weckx Luc Louis Maurice, Hirata Cleonice Hitomi Watashi, Abreu Marilda Aparecida Milanez Morgado de, Fillizolla Vilma Ciorla, Silva Olga Maria Panhoca da
departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 Mar-Apr;55(2):132-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000200014.
to utilize a double-blind protocol to provide clarification about the safety and effectiveness of levamisole in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis.
Fourteen patients took a decreasing dose of oral levamisole for six months (initial dose 150mg three times a week) and ten others were placebo control patients. All were evaluated monthly.
The number of crises had a tendency to decrease in both groups, but without a difference between groups. The number of lesions diminished significantly in the two groups, but upon comparison the difference was not significant. Duration of the lesions diminished significantly in the placebo, however when compared to the levamisole group, difference was not significant during treatment. The intensity of pain was significantly lower in the two groups, but upon comparison, pain was significantly lower in the placebo group. The final global evaluation showed improvement in 50% of patients of the levamisole group and in 70% of the placebo, without a significant difference between treatments. No difference in the frequency of collateral effects was observed between groups.
Levamisole, as used in this protocol, is a safe drug. When compared with the placebo, levamisole is not effective in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. The placebo effect is important in diseases where emotional factors affect recurrence or expression of symptoms.
采用双盲方案以明确左旋咪唑治疗复发性口疮性口炎的安全性和有效性。
14例患者口服逐渐减量的左旋咪唑,疗程6个月(初始剂量为每周3次,每次150mg),另外10例患者为安慰剂对照。所有患者每月进行评估。
两组患者的发作次数均有减少趋势,但组间无差异。两组患者的病损数量均显著减少,但比较后差异无统计学意义。安慰剂组病损持续时间显著缩短,但与左旋咪唑组相比,治疗期间差异无统计学意义。两组患者的疼痛强度均显著降低,但比较后安慰剂组疼痛程度显著更低。最终综合评估显示,左旋咪唑组50%的患者病情改善,安慰剂组70%的患者病情改善,治疗间差异无统计学意义。两组间不良反应发生率无差异。
本方案使用的左旋咪唑是一种安全的药物。与安慰剂相比,左旋咪唑对复发性口疮性口炎的预防性治疗无效。在情绪因素影响复发或症状表现的疾病中,安慰剂效应很重要。