• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利帕利珠单抗的成本效用分析:一项针对高危早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)预防的模拟模型研究结果。

Cost-utility analysis of palivizumab in Italy: results from a simulation model in the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection (RSV) among high-risk preterm infants.

机构信息

Neonatologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Ital J Pediatr. 2009 Feb 25;35(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-35-4.

DOI:10.1186/1824-7288-35-4
PMID:19490659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2687544/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility of palivizumab versus no prophylaxis in the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection among high-risk preterm infants.

METHODS

We used and adapted a pre-existent model in which two cohorts of patients received palivizumab or no prophylaxis. The patients were followed for their expected lifetimes. The economic evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. We considered Life-Years Gained (LYGs), Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) and direct medical costs (pharmacological treatment, hospitalization, recurrences for wheezing, etc.). LYGs and QALYs were based on the results of a double blind cohort study with prospective follow-up and direct medical costs were based on Italian treatment patterns. Benefits and costs were discounted at 3%. Costs were assessed in 2007 Euros. Sensitivity and threshold analysis on key clinical and economic parameters were performed.

RESULT

For the two cohorts, the expected life-years (per patient) with palivizumab versus no prophylaxis were 29.842 and 29.754 years, respectively. Quality-adjusted life years (per patient) with palivizumab were 29.202, and for no prophylaxis were 29.043. The expected cost (per patient) was euro 6,244.20 with palivizumab and euro 4,867.70 with no prophylaxis. We calculated for palivizumab versus no prophylaxis the incremental cost per LYG and per QALY gained. It was euro 15,568.65 and euro 8,676.74, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, compared with no prophylaxis, palivizumab is cost-effective in the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection among high risk preterm infants.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估帕利珠单抗与无预防措施相比,在预防高危早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染方面的成本效用。

方法

我们使用并改编了一个预先存在的模型,其中两个队列的患者接受了帕利珠单抗或无预防措施。患者被随访至预期寿命。经济评估从意大利国家卫生服务的角度进行。我们考虑了获得的生命年(LYG)、质量调整生命年(QALY)和直接医疗成本(药物治疗、住院、喘息复发等)。LYG 和 QALY 基于一项具有前瞻性随访的双盲队列研究结果,而直接医疗成本则基于意大利的治疗模式。效益和成本按 3%贴现。成本以 2007 年欧元计。对关键临床和经济参数进行了敏感性和阈值分析。

结果

对于两个队列,接受帕利珠单抗与无预防措施的预期生命年(每位患者)分别为 29.842 年和 29.754 年。接受帕利珠单抗的质量调整生命年(每位患者)为 29.202 年,无预防措施的为 29.043 年。预计每位患者的成本(欧元)分别为 6244.20 欧元和 4867.70 欧元。我们计算了帕利珠单抗与无预防措施相比,每获得一个 LYG 和 QALY 的增量成本。分别为 15568.65 欧元和 8676.74 欧元。

结论

与无预防措施相比,本研究表明帕利珠单抗在预防高危早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染方面具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/ea37ccfe2f80/1824-7288-35-4-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/9dc88238aef1/1824-7288-35-4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/61c25c66b136/1824-7288-35-4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/06f6f53f51a1/1824-7288-35-4-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/02cf6aa4599b/1824-7288-35-4-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/ea37ccfe2f80/1824-7288-35-4-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/9dc88238aef1/1824-7288-35-4-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/61c25c66b136/1824-7288-35-4-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/06f6f53f51a1/1824-7288-35-4-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/02cf6aa4599b/1824-7288-35-4-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ea/2687544/ea37ccfe2f80/1824-7288-35-4-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of palivizumab in Italy: results from a simulation model in the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection (RSV) among high-risk preterm infants.意大利帕利珠单抗的成本效用分析:一项针对高危早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)预防的模拟模型研究结果。
Ital J Pediatr. 2009 Feb 25;35(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-35-4.
2
Cost-utility analysis of Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection prophylaxis in preterm infants: update based on the clinical evidence in Spain.帕利珠单抗用于预防早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效用分析:基于西班牙临床证据的更新
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2803-0.
3
A new cost-utility analysis assessing risk factor-guided prophylaxis with palivizumab for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in Italian infants born at 29-35 weeks' gestational age.一项新的成本效益分析评估了帕利珠单抗针对 29-35 周龄胎龄出生的意大利婴儿进行的风险因素指导预防严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染的预防作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289828. eCollection 2023.
4
Palivizumab in the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children with congenital heart disease; a novel cost-utility modeling study reflecting evidence-based clinical pathways in Spain.帕利珠单抗预防先天性心脏病患儿严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染:一项反映西班牙循证临床路径的新型成本效用模型研究
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0181-3.
5
Immunoprophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) with palivizumab in children: a systematic review and economic evaluation.使用帕利珠单抗对儿童进行呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)免疫预防:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Dec;12(36):iii, ix-x, 1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta12360.
6
The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in premature infants with a gestational age of 32-35 weeks: a Canadian-based analysis .帕利珠单抗预防胎龄 32-35 周早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效果分析:基于加拿大的研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3223-37. doi: 10.1185/03007990802484234. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
7
Cost effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in high-risk children: a UK analysis.帕利珠单抗用于高危儿童预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效益:一项英国的分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(1):55-71. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725010-00006.
8
Cost-effectiveness of nirsevimab and palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in preterm infants 29-34 6/7 weeks' gestation in the United States.29-34 6/7 周早产儿在美国使用奈瑟单抗和帕利珠单抗预防呼吸道合胞病毒的成本效益。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2024 Mar;65(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
[The efficiency (cost-effectiveness) of palivizumab as prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus infection in premature infants with a gestational age of 32-35 weeks in Spain].[帕利珠单抗对西班牙孕周为32 - 35周的早产儿预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的有效性(成本效益)]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2006 Oct;65(4):316-24. doi: 10.1157/13092505.
10
Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children.用于降低儿童呼吸道合胞病毒感染风险的单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD006602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006602.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of palivizumab for preventing respiratory syncytial virus in preterm neonates and infants in Colombia.哥伦比亚早产儿和婴儿使用帕利珠单抗预防呼吸道合胞病毒的成本-效用分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09300-5.
2
A new cost-utility analysis assessing risk factor-guided prophylaxis with palivizumab for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in Italian infants born at 29-35 weeks' gestational age.一项新的成本效益分析评估了帕利珠单抗针对 29-35 周龄胎龄出生的意大利婴儿进行的风险因素指导预防严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染的预防作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289828. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Palivizumab prophylaxis, respiratory syncytial virus, and subsequent recurrent wheezing.帕利珠单抗预防、呼吸道合胞病毒与随后的复发性喘息
J Pediatr. 2007 Jul;151(1):34-42, 42.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.032.
2
Cost effectiveness of palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in high-risk children: a UK analysis.帕利珠单抗用于高危儿童预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的成本效益:一项英国的分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(1):55-71. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725010-00006.
3
[The efficiency (cost-effectiveness) of palivizumab as prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus infection in premature infants with a gestational age of 32-35 weeks in Spain].
Exploring the adoption of less restricted criteria for respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in late preterm infants: insights from a retrospective analysis.
探索放宽晚期早产儿呼吸道合胞病毒预防标准的应用:一项回顾性分析的见解
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 8;11:1154518. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1154518. eCollection 2023.
4
Cost-analysis of Withdrawing Immunoprophylaxis for Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants Born at 33-35 Weeks Gestational Age in Quebec: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.魁北克省 33-35 孕周出生婴儿撤除非呼吸合胞病毒免疫预防的成本分析:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Aug;39(8):694-699. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002719.
5
Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? - a cost-utility analysis.我们应该使用帕利珠单抗对婴儿进行呼吸道合胞病毒免疫预防吗?——一项成本效用分析。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Dec 17;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4.
6
Palivizumab in the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children with congenital heart disease; a novel cost-utility modeling study reflecting evidence-based clinical pathways in Spain.帕利珠单抗预防先天性心脏病患儿严重呼吸道合胞病毒感染:一项反映西班牙循证临床路径的新型成本效用模型研究
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0181-3.
7
The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab in infants with cystic fibrosis in the Canadian setting: A decision analysis model.加拿大背景下帕利珠单抗用于囊性纤维化婴儿的成本效益:一项决策分析模型
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Mar 4;13(3):599-606. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1235670. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Glycan variants of a respiratory syncytial virus antibody with enhanced effector function and in vivo efficacy.具有增强的效应功能和体内疗效的呼吸道合胞病毒抗体的聚糖变体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5992-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402458111. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
A decade of respiratory syncytial virus epidemiology and prophylaxis: translating evidence into everyday clinical practice.呼吸道合胞病毒流行病学和预防的十年:将证据转化为日常临床实践。
Can Respir J. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):e10-9. doi: 10.1155/2011/493056.
10
Economic results of a palivizumab seasonal prophylaxis using a cohorting software and vial sharing.使用队列软件和小瓶共享进行帕利珠单抗季节性预防的经济学结果。
Ital J Pediatr. 2010 Jul 7;36:48. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-36-48.
[帕利珠单抗对西班牙孕周为32 - 35周的早产儿预防呼吸道合胞病毒感染的有效性(成本效益)]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2006 Oct;65(4):316-24. doi: 10.1157/13092505.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab in premature infants without chronic lung disease.帕利珠单抗用于无慢性肺病早产儿的成本效益分析。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1070-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.10.1070.
5
Hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis before 12 months of age and subsequent asthma, atopy and wheeze: a longitudinal birth cohort study.12个月龄前因呼吸道合胞病毒细支气管炎住院与后续哮喘、特应性和喘息:一项出生队列纵向研究。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 Aug;16(5):386-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00298.x.
6
Changing health environment: the challenge to demonstrate cost-effectiveness of new compounds.不断变化的健康环境:证明新化合物成本效益的挑战。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22 Suppl 4:5-10. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422004-00003.
7
Severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in infancy and asthma and allergy at age 13.婴儿期严重呼吸道合胞病毒细支气管炎与13岁时的哮喘和过敏
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan 15;171(2):137-41. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-730OC. Epub 2004 Oct 29.
8
Respiratory morbidity 20 years after RSV infection in infancy.婴儿期呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染20年后的呼吸系统疾病发病率
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Aug;38(2):155-60. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20058.
9
Health care utilisation of prematurely born, preschool children related to hospitalisation for RSV infection.与呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染住院相关的早产学龄前儿童的医疗保健利用情况。
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jul;89(7):673-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.036129.
10
Seasonality of long term wheezing following respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection.呼吸道合胞病毒下呼吸道感染后长期喘息的季节性
Thorax. 2004 Jun;59(6):512-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2003.013391.