Pérez Concepción, Saldaña María Teresa, Navarro Ana, Vilardaga Inma, Rejas Javier
Pain Clinic, University Hospital 'La Princesa', C/Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Primary-Care Health Centre 'Raíces', Castrillón, Asturias, Spain.
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(7):441-450. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929070-00002.
Different studies have shown pain to be one of the most frequent causes of health-care resource utilization, and a major public health concern because of its social repercussions. In Spain there are no recent data on the prevalence and management of neuropathic pain in the general primary-care setting.
This study aimed to gain epidemiological insight into neuropathic pain in the Spanish primary-care setting. This was a cross-sectional, one-day, multicentre, observational epidemiological study involving 623 primary-care physicians in Spain. Patients who experienced pain were classified into three groups: pure neuropathic pain, mixed neuropathic pain or nociceptive pain. Pain intensity was evaluated on a visual analogue scale (VAS), range 0-10. Information on the location, duration, aetiology and current treatment of pain was obtained, together with data on whether the patients were referred to specialized care and to which type of specialist.
In a single day, 23 529 patients received primary care, and of these, 7220 experienced pain (30.7% [95% CI 29.5, 31.7]). Patients with pure neuropathic pain comprised 11.8% (95% CI 10.5, 13.2) of the 3044 patients for whom pain was the reason for consultation and the type of pain was documented, patients with mixed neuropathic pain accounted for 13.4% (95% CI 12.0, 14.8) of this group, and patients with nociceptive pain for 74.9% (95% CI 73.1, 76.7). Patients with pure neuropathic pain mostly received exclusively pharmacological treatment (84.6% [95% CI 80.3, 89.0]), with antiepileptic drugs being the most widely used substances (52.5% [95% CI 47.3, 57.7]), followed by non-opioid analgesics (35.2% [95% CI 30.2, 40.1]) and NSAIDs (26.8% [95% CI 22.2, 31.4]). The mean duration of neuropathic pain was 11.7 +/- 23.3 months. The mean pain intensity on the VAS exceeded 6 in all groups. Over half of the patients were diagnosed in the primary-care centre, and a large proportion in turn were referred to a specialist, most frequently an orthopaedist.
The results of the present study show the high prevalence of neuropathic pain at the primary-care level in Spain. In addition, the data presented here point to a need to improve the management of outpatients with neuropathic pain in the Spanish primary-care setting, particularly in relation to the higher than recommended use of NSAIDs (which are not indicated for neuropathic pain) and the lower than recommended use of antiepileptic drugs with an analgesic indication for pain with a neuropathic component.
不同研究表明,疼痛是医疗资源利用最常见的原因之一,且因其社会影响而成为一个主要的公共卫生问题。在西班牙,目前尚无关于普通初级保健机构中神经病理性疼痛患病率及管理情况的最新数据。
本研究旨在深入了解西班牙初级保健机构中神经病理性疼痛的流行病学情况。这是一项横断面、为期一天的多中心观察性流行病学研究,涉及西班牙的623名初级保健医生。经历疼痛的患者被分为三组:单纯神经病理性疼痛、混合性神经病理性疼痛或伤害性疼痛。采用0至10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。获取了有关疼痛的部位、持续时间、病因及当前治疗的信息,以及患者是否被转诊至专科护理及转诊至何种专科医生的数据。
在一天内,23529名患者接受了初级保健,其中7220名经历了疼痛(30.7%[95%CI 29.5, 31.7])。在因疼痛就诊且记录了疼痛类型的3044名患者中,单纯神经病理性疼痛患者占11.8%(95%CI 10.5, 13.2),混合性神经病理性疼痛患者占该组的13.4%(95%CI 12.0, 14.8),伤害性疼痛患者占74.9%(95%CI 73.1, 76.7)。单纯神经病理性疼痛患者大多仅接受药物治疗(84.6%[95%CI 80.3, 89.0]),其中抗癫痫药物是使用最广泛的药物(52.5%[95%CI 47.3, 57.7]),其次是非阿片类镇痛药(35.2%[95%CI 30.2, 40.1])和非甾体抗炎药(26.8%[95%CI 22.2, 31.4])。神经病理性疼痛的平均持续时间为11.7±23.3个月。所有组的VAS平均疼痛强度均超过6。超过一半的患者在初级保健中心被诊断,其中很大一部分又被转诊至专科医生,最常见的是骨科医生。
本研究结果表明,西班牙初级保健机构中神经病理性疼痛的患病率很高。此外,此处呈现的数据表明,在西班牙初级保健机构中,需要改善对神经病理性疼痛门诊患者的管理,特别是关于非甾体抗炎药的使用高于推荐水平(非甾体抗炎药不适用于神经病理性疼痛)以及具有镇痛适应症的抗癫痫药物用于伴有神经病理性成分疼痛的使用低于推荐水平的情况。