Ahmad Riris A, Mahendradhata Yodi, Cunningham Jane, Utarini Adi, de Vlas Sake J
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Jogjakarta, Indonesia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 8;9:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-87.
A mathematical model was designed to explore the impact of three strategies for better tuberculosis case finding. Strategies included: (1) reducing the number of tuberculosis patients who do not seek care; (2) reducing diagnostic delay; and (3) engaging non-DOTS providers in the referral of tuberculosis suspects to DOTS services in the Indonesian health system context. The impact of these strategies on tuberculosis mortality and treatment outcome was estimated using a mathematical model of the Indonesian health system.
The model consists of multiple compartments representing logical movement of a respiratory symptomatic (tuberculosis suspect) through the health system, including patient- and health system delays. Main outputs of the model are tuberculosis death rate and treatment outcome (i.e. full or partial cure). We quantified the model parameters for the Jogjakarta province context, using a two round Delphi survey with five Indonesian tuberculosis experts.
The model validation shows that four critical model outputs (average duration of symptom onset to treatment, detection rate, cure rate, and death rate) were reasonably close to existing available data, erring towards more optimistic outcomes than are actually reported. The model predicted that an intervention to reduce the proportion of tuberculosis patients who never seek care would have the biggest impact on tuberculosis death prevention, while an intervention resulting in more referrals of tuberculosis suspects to DOTS facilities would yield higher cure rates. This finding is similar for situations where the alternative sector is a more important health resource, such as in most other parts of Indonesia.
We used mathematical modeling to explore the impact of Indonesian health system interventions on tuberculosis treatment outcome and deaths. Because detailed data were not available regarding the current Indonesian population, we relied on expert opinion to quantify the parameters. The fact that the model output showed similar results to epidemiological data suggests that the experts had an accurate understanding of this subject, thereby reassuring the quality of our predictions. The model highlighted the potential effectiveness of active case finding of tuberculosis patients with limited access to DOTS facilities in the developing country setting.
设计了一个数学模型,以探讨三种改善结核病病例发现的策略的影响。这些策略包括:(1)减少未寻求治疗的结核病患者数量;(2)减少诊断延误;(3)在印度尼西亚卫生系统背景下,促使非直接观察短程治疗(DOTS)提供者将结核病疑似患者转诊至DOTS服务。利用印度尼西亚卫生系统的数学模型估计了这些策略对结核病死亡率和治疗结果的影响。
该模型由多个隔间组成,代表有呼吸道症状(结核病疑似患者)在卫生系统中的逻辑流动,包括患者和卫生系统的延误。该模型的主要输出是结核病死亡率和治疗结果(即完全或部分治愈)。我们采用两轮德尔菲调查,与五位印度尼西亚结核病专家一起,对爪哇加托省的模型参数进行了量化。
模型验证表明,四个关键的模型输出(从症状出现到治疗的平均持续时间、检出率、治愈率和死亡率)与现有可用数据相当接近,与实际报告相比,误差倾向于更乐观的结果。该模型预测,减少从未寻求治疗的结核病患者比例的干预措施对预防结核病死亡的影响最大,而导致更多结核病疑似患者转诊至DOTS设施的干预措施将产生更高的治愈率。在替代部门是更重要的卫生资源的情况下,例如在印度尼西亚的大多数其他地区,这一发现是相似的。
我们使用数学建模来探讨印度尼西亚卫生系统干预措施对结核病治疗结果和死亡的影响。由于没有关于当前印度尼西亚人口的详细数据,我们依靠专家意见来量化参数。模型输出与流行病学数据显示相似结果这一事实表明,专家们对该主题有准确的理解,从而使我们预测的质量得到保证。该模型突出了在发展中国家背景下,对难以获得DOTS设施的结核病患者进行主动病例发现的潜在有效性。