O'Grady Gregory, Egbuji John U, Du Peng, Cheng Leo K, Pullan Andrew J, Windsor John A
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
World J Surg. 2009 Aug;33(8):1693-701. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0096-1.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: High-frequency gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a relatively new treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis. There have been a number of clinical studies based on the use of a high-frequency stimulator (Enterra, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate evidence for improved clinical outcome with this device.
A literature search of major medical databases was performed for the period January 1992 to August 2008. Clinical studies involving an implanted high-frequency GES device were included and reported a range of clinical outcomes. Studies of external, temporary, and/or low-frequency GES were excluded.
Of 13 included studies, 12 lacked controls and only one was blinded and randomized. Following GES, patients reported improvements in total symptom severity score (3/13 studies, mean difference 6.52 [confidence interval--CI: 1.32, 11.73]; P = 0.01), vomiting severity score (4/13, 1.45 [CI: 0.99, 1.91]; P < 0.0001), nausea severity score (4/13, 1.69 [CI: 1.26, 2.12]; P < 0.0001), SF-36 physical composite score (4/13, 8.05 [CI: 5.01, 11.10]; P < 0.0001), SF-36 mental composite score (4/13, 8.16 [CI: 4.85, 11.47]; P < 0.0001), requirement for enteral or parenteral nutrition (8/13, OR 5.53 [CI: 2.75, 11.13]; P < 0.001), and 4-h gastric emptying (5/13, 12.7% [CI: 9.8, 15.6]; P < 0.0001). Weight gain did not reach significance (3/13, 3.68 kg [CI: -0.23, 7.58]; P = 0.07). The device removal or reimplantation rate was 8.3%.
Results show substantial benefits for high-frequency GES in the treatment of gastroparesis. However, caution is necessary in interpreting the results, primarily because of the limitations of uncontrolled studies. Further controlled studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of high-frequency GES.
高频胃电刺激(GES)是一种针对药物难治性胃轻瘫的相对较新的治疗方法。已经有许多基于使用高频刺激器(Enterra,美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)的临床研究。进行了一项荟萃分析以评估该设备改善临床结局的证据。
对1992年1月至2008年8月期间的主要医学数据库进行文献检索。纳入涉及植入式高频GES设备的临床研究,并报告了一系列临床结局。排除外部、临时和/或低频GES的研究。
在纳入的13项研究中,12项缺乏对照,只有1项是盲法和随机的。GES治疗后,患者报告总症状严重程度评分改善(13项研究中的3项,平均差异6.52[置信区间 - CI:1.32,11.73];P = 0.01),呕吐严重程度评分(13项中的4项,1.45[CI:0.99,1.91];P < 0.0001),恶心严重程度评分(13项中的4项,1.69[CI:1.26,2.12];P < 0.0001),SF - 36身体综合评分(13项中的4项,8.05[CI:5.01,11.10];P < 0.0001),SF - 36心理综合评分(13项中的4项,8.16[CI:4.85,11.47];P < 0.0001),肠内或肠外营养需求(13项中的8项,OR 5.53[CI:2.75,11.13];P < 0.001),以及4小时胃排空(13项中的5项,12.7%[CI:9.8,15.6];P < 0.0001)。体重增加未达到显著水平(13项中的3项,3.68 kg[CI: - 0.23,7.58];P = 0.07)。设备移除或重新植入率为8.3%。
结果显示高频GES在治疗胃轻瘫方面有显著益处。然而,在解释结果时需要谨慎,主要是因为非对照研究的局限性。需要进一步的对照研究来证实高频GES的临床益处。