Kamstrup Pia R, Tybjaerg-Hansen Anne, Steffensen Rolf, Nordestgaard Børge G
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark.
JAMA. 2009 Jun 10;301(22):2331-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.801.
High levels of lipoprotein(a) are associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI).
To assess whether genetic data are consistent with this association being causal.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three studies of white individuals from Copenhagen, Denmark, were used: the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS), a prospective general population study with 16 years of follow-up (1991-2007, n = 8637, 599 MI events); the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), a cross-sectional general population study (2003-2006, n = 29 388, 994 MI events); and the Copenhagen Ischemic Heart Disease Study (CIHDS), a case-control study (1991-2004, n = 2461, 1231 MI events).
Plasma lipoprotein(a) levels, lipoprotein(a) kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) size polymorphism genotype, and MIs recorded from 1976 through July 2007 for all participants.
In the CCHS, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for MI for elevated lipoprotein(a) levels were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-1.6; events/10,000 person-years, 59) for levels between the 22nd and 66th percentile, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.2; events/10,000 person-years, 75) for the 67th to 89th percentile, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2-3.0; events/10,000 person-years, 84) for the 90th to 95th percentile, and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.1; events/10,000 person-years, 108) for levels greater than the 95th percentile, respectively, vs levels less than the 22nd percentile (events/10,000 person-years, 55) (trend P < .001). Numbers of KIV-2 repeats (sum of repeats on both alleles) ranged from 6 to 99 and on analysis of variance explained 21% and 27% of all variation in plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in the CCHS and CGPS, respectively. Mean lipoprotein(a) levels were 56, 31, 20, and 15 mg/dL for the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of KIV-2 repeats in the CCHS, respectively (trend P < .001); corresponding values in the CGPS were 60, 34, 22, and 19 mg/dL (trend P < .001). In the CCHS, multivariable-adjusted HRs for MI were 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9; events/10,000 person-years, 75), 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; events/10,000 person-years, 66), and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.4; events/10,000 person-years, 57) for individuals in the first, second, and third quartiles, respectively, as compared with individuals in the fourth quartile of KIV-2 repeats (events/10,000 person-years, 51) (trend P < .001). Corresponding odds ratios were 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.5), 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.3), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1) in the CGPS (trend P = .005), and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7), 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6), and 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6) in the CIHDS (trend P = .01). Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) was associated with an HR of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.37) per doubling of lipoprotein(a) level on instrumental variable analysis, while the corresponding value for plasma lipoprotein(a) levels on Cox regression was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.12).
These data are consistent with a causal association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and increased risk of MI.
高水平的脂蛋白(a)与心肌梗死(MI)风险增加相关。
评估基因数据是否与这种关联具有因果关系一致。
设计、设置和参与者:使用了来自丹麦哥本哈根的三项白人研究:哥本哈根市心脏研究(CCHS),一项有16年随访的前瞻性普通人群研究(1991 - 2007年,n = 8637,599例MI事件);哥本哈根普通人群研究(CGPS),一项横断面普通人群研究(2003 - 2006年,n = 29388,994例MI事件);以及哥本哈根缺血性心脏病研究(CIHDS),一项病例对照研究(1991 - 2004年,n = 2461,1231例MI事件)。
所有参与者的血浆脂蛋白(a)水平、脂蛋白(a) kringle IV 型2(KIV - 2)大小多态性基因型,以及1976年至2007年7月记录的MI事件。
在CCHS中,脂蛋白(a)水平升高的MI多变量调整风险比(HR),第22至66百分位数之间的水平为1.2(95%置信区间[CI],0.9 - 1.6;事件/10,000人年,59),第67至89百分位数为1.6(95% CI,1.1 - 2.2;事件/10,000人年,75),第90至95百分位数为1.9(95% CI,1.2 - 3.0;事件/10,000人年,84),高于第95百分位数的水平为2.6(95% CI,1.6 - 4.1;事件/10,000人年,108),与低于第22百分位数的水平(事件/10,000人年,55)相比(趋势P <.001)。KIV - 2重复序列(两个等位基因上重复序列的总和)范围为6至99,方差分析表明其分别解释了CCHS和CGPS中血浆脂蛋白(a)水平所有变异的21%和27%。CCHS中KIV - 2重复序列的第一、第二、第三和第四四分位数的平均脂蛋白(a)水平分别为56、31、20和15 mg/dL(趋势P <.001);CGPS中的相应值为60、34、22和19 mg/dL(趋势P <.001)。在CCHS中,与KIV - 2重复序列第四四分位数的个体(事件/10,000人年,51)相比,第一、第二和第三四分位数个体的MI多变量调整HR分别为1.5(95% CI,1.2 - 1.9;事件/10,000人年,75)、1.3(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6;事件/10,000人年,66)和1.1(95% CI,0.9 - 1.4;事件/10,000人年,57)(趋势P <.001)。CGPS中的相应比值比分别为1.3(95% CI,1.1 - 1.5)、1.1(95% CI,0.9 - 1.3)和0.9(95% CI,0.8 - 1.1)(趋势P =.005),CIHDS中的相应比值比分别为1.4(95% CI,1.1 - 1.7)、1.2(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6)和1.3(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6)(趋势P =.01)。在工具变量分析中,基因水平升高的脂蛋白(a)与脂蛋白(a)水平每加倍一次的HR为1.22(95% CI,1.09 - 1.37)相关,而Cox回归中血浆脂蛋白(a)水平的相应值为1.08(95% CI,1.03 - 1.12)。
这些数据与脂蛋白(a)水平升高和MI风险增加之间的因果关联一致。