Suppr超能文献

基因水平升高的脂蛋白(a)与心肌梗死风险增加

Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kamstrup Pia R, Tybjaerg-Hansen Anne, Steffensen Rolf, Nordestgaard Børge G

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

JAMA. 2009 Jun 10;301(22):2331-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.801.

Abstract

CONTEXT

High levels of lipoprotein(a) are associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether genetic data are consistent with this association being causal.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three studies of white individuals from Copenhagen, Denmark, were used: the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS), a prospective general population study with 16 years of follow-up (1991-2007, n = 8637, 599 MI events); the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), a cross-sectional general population study (2003-2006, n = 29 388, 994 MI events); and the Copenhagen Ischemic Heart Disease Study (CIHDS), a case-control study (1991-2004, n = 2461, 1231 MI events).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Plasma lipoprotein(a) levels, lipoprotein(a) kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) size polymorphism genotype, and MIs recorded from 1976 through July 2007 for all participants.

RESULTS

In the CCHS, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for MI for elevated lipoprotein(a) levels were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-1.6; events/10,000 person-years, 59) for levels between the 22nd and 66th percentile, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.2; events/10,000 person-years, 75) for the 67th to 89th percentile, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2-3.0; events/10,000 person-years, 84) for the 90th to 95th percentile, and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.1; events/10,000 person-years, 108) for levels greater than the 95th percentile, respectively, vs levels less than the 22nd percentile (events/10,000 person-years, 55) (trend P < .001). Numbers of KIV-2 repeats (sum of repeats on both alleles) ranged from 6 to 99 and on analysis of variance explained 21% and 27% of all variation in plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in the CCHS and CGPS, respectively. Mean lipoprotein(a) levels were 56, 31, 20, and 15 mg/dL for the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of KIV-2 repeats in the CCHS, respectively (trend P < .001); corresponding values in the CGPS were 60, 34, 22, and 19 mg/dL (trend P < .001). In the CCHS, multivariable-adjusted HRs for MI were 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9; events/10,000 person-years, 75), 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; events/10,000 person-years, 66), and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.4; events/10,000 person-years, 57) for individuals in the first, second, and third quartiles, respectively, as compared with individuals in the fourth quartile of KIV-2 repeats (events/10,000 person-years, 51) (trend P < .001). Corresponding odds ratios were 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.5), 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.3), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1) in the CGPS (trend P = .005), and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7), 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6), and 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6) in the CIHDS (trend P = .01). Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) was associated with an HR of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.37) per doubling of lipoprotein(a) level on instrumental variable analysis, while the corresponding value for plasma lipoprotein(a) levels on Cox regression was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.12).

CONCLUSION

These data are consistent with a causal association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and increased risk of MI.

摘要

背景

高水平的脂蛋白(a)与心肌梗死(MI)风险增加相关。

目的

评估基因数据是否与这种关联具有因果关系一致。

设计、设置和参与者:使用了来自丹麦哥本哈根的三项白人研究:哥本哈根市心脏研究(CCHS),一项有16年随访的前瞻性普通人群研究(1991 - 2007年,n = 8637,599例MI事件);哥本哈根普通人群研究(CGPS),一项横断面普通人群研究(2003 - 2006年,n = 29388,994例MI事件);以及哥本哈根缺血性心脏病研究(CIHDS),一项病例对照研究(1991 - 2004年,n = 2461,1231例MI事件)。

主要结局指标

所有参与者的血浆脂蛋白(a)水平、脂蛋白(a) kringle IV 型2(KIV - 2)大小多态性基因型,以及1976年至2007年7月记录的MI事件。

结果

在CCHS中,脂蛋白(a)水平升高的MI多变量调整风险比(HR),第22至66百分位数之间的水平为1.2(95%置信区间[CI],0.9 - 1.6;事件/10,000人年,59),第67至89百分位数为1.6(95% CI,1.1 - 2.2;事件/10,000人年,75),第90至95百分位数为1.9(95% CI,1.2 - 3.0;事件/10,000人年,84),高于第95百分位数的水平为2.6(95% CI,1.6 - 4.1;事件/10,000人年,108),与低于第22百分位数的水平(事件/10,000人年,55)相比(趋势P <.001)。KIV - 2重复序列(两个等位基因上重复序列的总和)范围为6至99,方差分析表明其分别解释了CCHS和CGPS中血浆脂蛋白(a)水平所有变异的21%和27%。CCHS中KIV - 2重复序列的第一、第二、第三和第四四分位数的平均脂蛋白(a)水平分别为56、31、20和15 mg/dL(趋势P <.001);CGPS中的相应值为60、34、22和19 mg/dL(趋势P <.001)。在CCHS中,与KIV - 2重复序列第四四分位数的个体(事件/10,000人年,51)相比,第一、第二和第三四分位数个体的MI多变量调整HR分别为1.5(95% CI,1.2 - 1.9;事件/10,000人年,75)、1.3(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6;事件/10,000人年,66)和1.1(95% CI,0.9 - 1.4;事件/10,000人年,57)(趋势P <.001)。CGPS中的相应比值比分别为1.3(95% CI,1.1 - 1.5)、1.1(95% CI,0.9 - 1.3)和0.9(95% CI,0.8 - 1.1)(趋势P =.005),CIHDS中的相应比值比分别为1.4(95% CI,1.1 - 1.7)、1.2(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6)和1.3(95% CI,1.0 - 1.6)(趋势P =.01)。在工具变量分析中,基因水平升高的脂蛋白(a)与脂蛋白(a)水平每加倍一次的HR为1.22(95% CI,1.09 - 1.37)相关,而Cox回归中血浆脂蛋白(a)水平的相应值为1.08(95% CI,1.03 - 1.12)。

结论

这些数据与脂蛋白(a)水平升高和MI风险增加之间的因果关联一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验