通过护理电子病历术语（ENP）-国际护理实践分类法（ICNP）交叉映射推动标准化护理术语的发展。
Furthering the development of standardized nursing terminology through an ENP-ICNP cross-mapping.
作者信息
Wieteck P
机构信息
ENP Research and Development Group, Bad Emstal(Kassel), Germany.
出版信息
Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Sep;55(3):296-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00639.x.
PURPOSE
To examine the completeness and validity of the terms used in ENP in describing nursing diagnoses using a cross-mapping to ICNP.
METHODS
The mapping procedure was carried out using the parallel mapping method.
RESULTS
The interrater reliability showed good to very good results. The percentage of agreement of the rating results for the ICNP phenomenon axes was between 73% and 99%, and the randomly adjusted Cohen's Kappa value was 0.88 on the ICNP focus axis.
DISCUSSION
The results of the mapping show that both classifications, ENP and INCP, are not yet complete for illustrating all aspects of nursing. Both classifications use a large proportion of overlapping terms (75%), and a small proportion of terms (25%) which describe different dimensions of nursing in both ENP and ICNP.
CONCLUSION
The results of the mapping are discussed in consideration of the nurse's perspective. The main focus is on the difference between pre-combined systems, like ENP, and post-combined, like ICNP, and their implications on the use of nursing classifications in practice for the illustration of the nursing process.
目的
通过与国际护理实践分类法（ICNP）交叉映射，检验欧洲护理诊断协会（ENP）中用于描述护理诊断的术语的完整性和有效性。
方法
采用平行映射法进行映射程序。
结果
评分者间信度显示出良好到非常好的结果。ICNP现象轴评分结果的一致率在73%至99%之间，ICNP焦点轴上随机调整后的科恩kappa值为0.88。
讨论
映射结果表明，ENP和ICNP这两种分类法在阐述护理的所有方面时都还不完整。两种分类法都使用了很大比例的重叠术语（75%），以及一小部分在ENP和ICNP中描述护理不同维度的术语（25%）。
结论
从护士的角度对映射结果进行了讨论。主要关注点在于像ENP这样的预组合系统与像ICNP这样的后组合系统之间的差异，以及它们对实践中使用护理分类法以阐述护理过程的影响。
Zotero 插件