Giobbie-Hurder Anita, Price Karen N, Gelber Richard D
International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):272-87. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105380.
Aromatase inhibitors provide superior disease control when compared with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.
To present the design, history, and analytic challenges of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial: an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase-III study comparing the aromatase inhibitor letrozole with tamoxifen in this clinical setting.
From 1998-2003, BIG 1-98 enrolled 8028 women to receive monotherapy with either tamoxifen or letrozole for 5 years, or sequential therapy of 2 years of one agent followed by 3 years of the other. Randomization to one of four treatment groups permitted two complementary analyses to be conducted several years apart. The first, reported in 2005, provided a head-to-head comparison of letrozole versus tamoxifen. Statistical power was increased by an enriched design, which included patients who were assigned sequential treatments until the time of the treatment switch. The second, reported in late 2008, used a conditional landmark approach to test the hypothesis that switching endocrine agents at approximately 2 years from randomization for patients who are disease-free is superior to continuing with the original agent.
The 2005 analysis showed the superiority of letrozole compared with tamoxifen. The patients who were assigned tamoxifen alone were unblinded and offered the opportunity to switch to letrozole. Results from other trials increased the clinical relevance about whether or not to start treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen, and analysis plans were expanded to evaluate sequential versus single-agent strategies from randomization.
Due to the unblinding of patients assigned tamoxifen alone, analysis of updated data will require ascertainment of the influence of selective crossover from tamoxifen to letrozole.
BIG 1-98 is an example of an enriched design, involving complementary analyses addressing different questions several years apart, and subject to evolving analytic plans influenced by new data that emerge over time.
与他莫昔芬相比,芳香化酶抑制剂作为内分泌反应性早期乳腺癌绝经后女性的辅助治疗能提供更好的疾病控制效果。
介绍国际乳腺癌研究组(BIG)1-98试验的设计、历程及分析挑战:一项国际多中心随机双盲III期研究,在该临床背景下比较芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑与他莫昔芬。
1998年至2003年,BIG 1-98研究纳入8028名女性,她们接受他莫昔芬或来曲唑单药治疗5年,或序贯治疗,即先接受一种药物治疗2年,然后换用另一种药物治疗3年。随机分为四个治疗组之一,使得相隔数年能够进行两项互补分析。第一项分析于2005年报告,提供了来曲唑与他莫昔芬的直接对比。通过富集设计提高了统计效能,该设计纳入了接受序贯治疗直至换药时的患者。第二项分析于2008年末报告,采用条件性标志性方法检验以下假设:对于无疾病的患者,在随机分组约2年后更换内分泌药物优于继续使用原药物。
2005年的分析显示来曲唑优于他莫昔芬。单独接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者被揭盲,并获得了换用来曲唑的机会。其他试验的结果增加了关于是否从来曲唑或他莫昔芬开始治疗的临床相关性,并且分析计划得到扩展,以评估从随机分组开始的序贯治疗与单药治疗策略。
由于单独接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者被揭盲,更新数据的分析将需要确定从他莫昔芬选择性交叉到来曲唑的影响。
BIG 1-98是富集设计的一个例子,涉及相隔数年解决不同问题的互补分析,并受到随时间出现的新数据影响而不断演变的分析计划的影响。