du Prel Jean-Baptist, Röhrig Bernd, Blettner Maria
Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Feb;106(7):100-5. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0100. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
In the era of evidence-based medicine, one of the most important skills a physician needs is the ability to analyze scientific literature critically. This is necessary to keep medical knowledge up to date and to ensure optimal patient care. The aim of this paper is to present an accessible introduction into critical appraisal of scientific articles.
Using a selection of international literature, the reader is introduced to the principles of critical reading of scientific articles in medicine. For the sake of conciseness, detailed description of statistical methods is omitted.
Widely accepted principles for critically appraising scientific articles are outlined. Basic knowledge of study design, structuring of an article, the role of different sections, of statistical presentations as well as sources of error and limitation are presented. The reader does not require extensive methodological knowledge. As far as necessary for critical appraisal of scientific articles, differences in research areas like epidemiology, clinical, and basic research are outlined. Further useful references are presented.
Basic methodological knowledge is required to select and interpret scientific articles correctly.
在循证医学时代,医生所需的最重要技能之一是批判性分析科学文献的能力。这对于保持医学知识与时俱进并确保为患者提供最佳护理至关重要。本文旨在对科学文章的批判性评价进行通俗易懂的介绍。
通过精选国际文献,向读者介绍医学科学文章批判性阅读的原则。为简洁起见,省略了统计方法的详细描述。
概述了广泛接受的科学文章批判性评价原则。介绍了研究设计的基础知识、文章结构、不同部分的作用、统计呈现方式以及误差和局限性来源。读者无需具备广泛的方法学知识。在对科学文章进行批判性评价所需的范围内,概述了流行病学、临床研究和基础研究等研究领域的差异。还提供了进一步有用的参考文献。
需要具备基本的方法学知识才能正确选择和解读科学文章。