Williams Robert L, Shelley Brian M, Sussman Andrew L
Department of Family and Community Medicine, MSC 09 5040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):428-35. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.090060.
Interest in community-based participatory research (CBPR) has surged during the last several years because of its potential to enhance the quality and usefulness of research outcomes. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) potentially can provide a bridge between the research endeavor and communities; PBRNs have been identified as a promising venue for CBPR. However, this marriage of CBPR and PBRNs faces many challenges, such as locus of project idea generation, time constraints, and funding limitations.
This was a case study of the application of the CBPR model and CBPR principles specific to PBRN research using a recent PBRN study of communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicines.
Challenges (eg, added cost, time) and benefits (eg, improved research data collection process, enhanced data analysis) resulted from application of the CBPR model and are detailed.
For practical and ethical reasons, PBRNs need to adopt the CBPR approach for certain types, if not all, of their research. This might require operational adaptations by the PBRN (eg, a community advisory board, community membership in the network board of directors, and outreach to community groups for input into network priorities) as well as dedicated time and funding.
在过去几年中,基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)受到的关注激增,因为它有潜力提高研究成果的质量和实用性。基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)有可能在研究工作与社区之间架起一座桥梁;PBRN已被视为CBPR的一个有前景的场所。然而,CBPR与PBRN的这种结合面临许多挑战,如项目创意的产生地点、时间限制和资金限制。
这是一项案例研究,采用最近一项关于传统、补充和替代医学沟通的PBRN研究,应用CBPR模型和特定于PBRN研究的CBPR原则。
应用CBPR模型产生了挑战(如成本增加、时间)和益处(如改进研究数据收集过程、加强数据分析),并进行了详细说明。
出于实际和伦理原因,PBRN对于其某些类型(即使不是全部)的研究需要采用CBPR方法。这可能需要PBRN进行运营调整(如设立社区咨询委员会、让社区成员加入网络董事会,以及向社区团体进行宣传以获取对网络优先事项的意见),以及投入专门的时间和资金。