Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助 UKA 可改善胫骨组件对线:一项初步研究。

Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

机构信息

Booth Bartolozzi Balderston Orthopaedics, Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5. Epub 2009 Jul 11.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The alignment of the components of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) reportedly influences outcomes and durability. A novel robotic arm technology has been developed with the expectation that it could improve the accuracy of bone preparation in UKA. During the study period, we compared the postoperative radiographic alignment of the tibial component with the preoperatively planned position in 31 knees in 31 consecutive patients undergoing UKA using robotic arm-assisted bone preparation and in 27 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral UKA using conventional manual instrumentation to determine the error of bone preparation and variance with each technique. Radiographically, the root mean square error of the posterior tibial slope was 3.1 degrees when using manual techniques compared with 1.9 degrees when using robotic arm assistance for bone preparation. In addition, the variance using manual instruments was 2.6 times greater than the robotically guided procedures. In the coronal plane, the average error was 2.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees more varus of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibia using manual instruments compared with 0.2 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees with robotic technology, and the varus/valgus root mean square error was 3.4 degrees manually compared with 1.8 degrees robotically. Further study will be necessary to determine whether a reduction in alignment errors of these magnitudes will ultimately influence implant function or survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

未加标签

据报道,单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)组件的对线会影响结果和耐用性。已经开发出一种新型的机器人臂技术,预计它可以提高 UKA 中骨准备的准确性。在研究期间,我们比较了 31 例连续患者的 31 膝机器人辅助骨准备 UKA 和 27 例连续患者的单侧 UKA 的术后胫骨组件与术前计划位置的放射学对线,以确定骨准备的误差和两种技术之间的差异。放射学上,使用手动技术时胫骨后倾角的均方根误差为 3.1 度,而使用机器人臂辅助骨准备时为 1.9 度。此外,使用手动仪器的方差比机器人引导程序大 2.6 倍。在冠状面,与使用机器人技术相比,使用手动仪器时胫骨组件相对于胫骨机械轴的平均误差为 2.7 度 +/- 2.1 度的内翻,而与机器人技术相比,内翻/外翻的均方根误差为 3.4 度手动与 1.8 度机器人。需要进一步研究以确定这些幅度的对线误差减少是否会最终影响植入物的功能或存活率。

证据水平

三级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
2
An Experienced Surgeon Can Meet or Exceed Robotic Accuracy in Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1479-1484. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00906.
3
Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1823-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4826-x. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
FTFA change under valgus stress force radiography is useful for evaluating the correctability of intra-articular varus deformity in UKA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):1003-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2945-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Obliquity of tibial component after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Knee. 2019 Mar;26(2):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
9
External rotation of the tibial component should be avoided in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Knee. 2021 Jun;30:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

4
Applications of machine learning and deep learning in musculoskeletal medicine: a narrative review.
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 15;30(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02511-9.
9
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves functional outcomes, complications, and revisions.
Bone Jt Open. 2024 May 1;5(5):374-384. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.55.BJO-2024-0030.R1.
10
High return to sport rate in patients undergoing image-based robotic arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4037-4044. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05141-0. Epub 2023 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Outcomes of robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Feb;38(2 Suppl):20-2.
3
Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States.
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr;23(3):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
4
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jan;16(1):9-18. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200801000-00003.
6
Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.012.
7
Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.010.
8
Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Feb;88(2):188-97. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17220.
9
Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):44-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16266.
10
Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Nov;440:60-6. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000187062.65691.e3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验