Booth Bartolozzi Balderston Orthopaedics, Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
The alignment of the components of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) reportedly influences outcomes and durability. A novel robotic arm technology has been developed with the expectation that it could improve the accuracy of bone preparation in UKA. During the study period, we compared the postoperative radiographic alignment of the tibial component with the preoperatively planned position in 31 knees in 31 consecutive patients undergoing UKA using robotic arm-assisted bone preparation and in 27 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral UKA using conventional manual instrumentation to determine the error of bone preparation and variance with each technique. Radiographically, the root mean square error of the posterior tibial slope was 3.1 degrees when using manual techniques compared with 1.9 degrees when using robotic arm assistance for bone preparation. In addition, the variance using manual instruments was 2.6 times greater than the robotically guided procedures. In the coronal plane, the average error was 2.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees more varus of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibia using manual instruments compared with 0.2 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees with robotic technology, and the varus/valgus root mean square error was 3.4 degrees manually compared with 1.8 degrees robotically. Further study will be necessary to determine whether a reduction in alignment errors of these magnitudes will ultimately influence implant function or survival.
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
据报道,单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)组件的对线会影响结果和耐用性。已经开发出一种新型的机器人臂技术,预计它可以提高 UKA 中骨准备的准确性。在研究期间,我们比较了 31 例连续患者的 31 膝机器人辅助骨准备 UKA 和 27 例连续患者的单侧 UKA 的术后胫骨组件与术前计划位置的放射学对线,以确定骨准备的误差和两种技术之间的差异。放射学上,使用手动技术时胫骨后倾角的均方根误差为 3.1 度,而使用机器人臂辅助骨准备时为 1.9 度。此外,使用手动仪器的方差比机器人引导程序大 2.6 倍。在冠状面,与使用机器人技术相比,使用手动仪器时胫骨组件相对于胫骨机械轴的平均误差为 2.7 度 +/- 2.1 度的内翻,而与机器人技术相比,内翻/外翻的均方根误差为 3.4 度手动与 1.8 度机器人。需要进一步研究以确定这些幅度的对线误差减少是否会最终影响植入物的功能或存活率。
三级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。