• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基尔社区膝关节疼痛论坛:关于与利益相关者就预防膝关节疼痛和残疾问题进行接触的行动研究。

The Keele community knee pain forum: action research to engage with stakeholders about the prevention of knee pain and disability.

作者信息

Jinks Clare, Ong Bie Nio, O'Neill Tracey J

机构信息

Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Keele University Keele, UK.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jul 15;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-85.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-10-85
PMID:19604353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2728703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involvement of users in health care research is central to UK health care policy, and guidelines for involvement exist. However, there are limited examples in rheumatology research. The aim of this study was to establish a community knee pain forum aimed at engaging stakeholders in design, dissemination and prioritisation of knee pain research.

METHODS

Ten people were recruited to the forum representing a wide range of agencies. These included Weight Watchers, the leisure industry, Beth Johnson Foundation, health and social care professionals and the public. Three two-hour meetings over a two-year period were held. Experienced qualitative researchers facilitated each meeting. Written feedback after each meeting was elicited, and a short evaluation form was mailed to all members after the final meeting.

RESULTS

Establishing and maintaining a forum of mixed members required careful preparation and ongoing support. Meetings had to be well-structured in order to allow for balanced participation of lay and professional users. Users contributed to the design of methods, provided ideas for dissemination and set priorities for further research. Clear documentation of meetings ensured that users' contributions to the research cycle were transparent.

CONCLUSION

Our knee pain forum illustrates that community engagement can have a positive impact on the development, dissemination and implementation of health research. Engaging with non-academic partners enables mutual learning and this enhances the quality of NHS research.

摘要

背景

让用户参与医疗保健研究是英国医疗保健政策的核心,并且存在相关参与指南。然而,在风湿病学研究中此类例子有限。本研究的目的是建立一个社区膝关节疼痛论坛,旨在让利益相关者参与膝关节疼痛研究的设计、传播和优先级确定。

方法

招募了10人加入该论坛,他们代表了广泛的机构。这些机构包括慧俪轻体、休闲产业、贝丝·约翰逊基金会、卫生和社会护理专业人员以及公众。在两年时间内举行了三次两小时的会议。经验丰富的定性研究人员主持每次会议。每次会议后都收集书面反馈,并在最后一次会议后向所有成员邮寄一份简短的评估表。

结果

建立并维持一个成员构成多样的论坛需要精心准备和持续支持。会议必须精心组织,以便让普通用户和专业用户都能均衡参与。用户参与了研究方法的设计,提供了传播思路,并确定了进一步研究的优先级。会议的清晰记录确保了用户对研究周期的贡献是透明的。

结论

我们的膝关节疼痛论坛表明,社区参与能够对健康研究的开展、传播和实施产生积极影响。与非学术伙伴合作能够实现相互学习,进而提高国民保健服务研究的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/2728703/77a016c31600/1471-2474-10-85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/2728703/77a016c31600/1471-2474-10-85-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b93e/2728703/77a016c31600/1471-2474-10-85-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Keele community knee pain forum: action research to engage with stakeholders about the prevention of knee pain and disability.基尔社区膝关节疼痛论坛:关于与利益相关者就预防膝关节疼痛和残疾问题进行接触的行动研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jul 15;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-85.
2
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
3
Community-Engaged Strategies to Promote Relevance of Research Capacity-Building Efforts Targeting Community Organizations.社区参与策略,以提高针对社区组织的研究能力建设努力的相关性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):513-7. doi: 10.1111/cts.12274. Epub 2015 May 7.
4
Help-seeking behaviour among people living with chronic hip or knee pain in the community.社区中慢性髋或膝关节疼痛人群的求助行为。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Dec 7;10:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-153.
5
iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.“自我帮助”:一项在新西兰共同设计的、符合文化背景的在线疼痛管理计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 21;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9.
6
A longitudinal study of knee pain in older men: Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.一项针对老年男性膝关节疼痛的纵向研究:康科德健康与男性老龄化研究项目。
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):206-12. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft188. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
7
8
9
The impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, 2003-13: a multimethod evaluation.2003 - 2013年英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估项目的影响:多方法评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(67):1-291. doi: 10.3310/hta19670.
10
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.2017年社区参与研究(CEnR)科学进展会议论文集
BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
2
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of bracing in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis management: protocol for a multicentre, primary care, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial.症状性膝骨关节炎管理中支具的临床和成本效益:一项多中心、初级保健、随机、平行组、优效性试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 26;11(3):e048196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048196.
3
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.

本文引用的文献

1
User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions.用户参与、研究与健康不平等:开拓新方向。
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Jul;15(4):306-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x.
2
Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits.患者与专业人员作为研究伙伴:挑战、实际问题及益处
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug 15;55(4):676-80. doi: 10.1002/art.22091.
3
Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.
临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Scoping review of priority setting of research topics for musculoskeletal conditions.肌肉骨骼疾病研究主题优先级设定的范围综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e023962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023962.
5
Patient-reported quality indicators for osteoarthritis: a patient and public generated self-report measure for primary care.骨关节炎患者报告的质量指标:一项由患者和公众生成的初级保健自我报告测量方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 17;2:5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0019-x. eCollection 2016.
6
Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: A case study of a research centre.维持患者和公众对研究的参与:一个研究中心的案例研究
J Care Serv Manag. 2013 Dec;7(4):146-154. doi: 10.1179/1750168715Y.0000000003.
7
Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences--lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study.促进和阻碍患者长期参与结局会议的因素——从 OMERACT 十年合作中获得的经验教训:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 23;3(8):e003311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003311.
8
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.患者及服务使用者参与研究:一项系统综述与综合框架
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences.让患者研究伙伴参与其中对结局研究有重大影响:对国际 OMERACT 会议的响应性评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 9;3(5):e002241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241.
10
Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.不要忘记专业人士——用于指导患者参与风湿病研究结构方面的FIRST模型的价值。
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):489-503. doi: 10.1111/hex.12048. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
消费者参与制定医疗保健政策与研究、临床实践指南及患者信息材料的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2.
4
Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research.消费者驱动的医疗保健:建立研究伙伴关系。
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):352-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00347.x.
5
Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis--progress at OMERACT 7.将患者观点纳入类风湿关节炎的疗效评估——在OMERACT 7会议上取得的进展
J Rheumatol. 2005 Nov;32(11):2250-6.
6
Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries.患者参与健康研究:针对脊髓损伤患者并由其参与的研究。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Dec;15(10):1310-28. doi: 10.1177/1049732305282382.
7
The impact of service user involvement in research.服务使用者参与研究的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860510588133.
8
Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis.国民保健服务体系(NHS)研究中消费者成功参与的原则与指标:德尔菲研究及亚组分析结果
Health Policy. 2006 Feb;75(3):280-97. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.03.012.
9
The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?患者的经验性知识:生物医学研究的新资源?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(11):2575-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023. Epub 2004 Dec 21.
10
Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded.消费者参与有关资助哪些与健康相关研究的决策。
Health Policy. 2004 Dec;70(3):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.004.