Shippee Nathan D, Domecq Garces Juan Pablo, Prutsky Lopez Gabriela J, Wang Zhen, Elraiyah Tarig A, Nabhan Mohammed, Brito Juan P, Boehmer Kasey, Hasan Rim, Firwana Belal, Erwin Patricia J, Montori Victor M, Murad M Hassan
Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Knowledge Synthesis Program, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
There is growing attention towards increasing patient and service user engagement (PSUE) in biomedical and health services research. Existing variations in language and design inhibit reporting and indexing, which are crucial to comparative effectiveness in determining best practices.
This paper utilizes a systematic review and environmental scan to derive an evidence-based framework for PSUE.
A metanarrative systematic review and environmental scan/manual search using scientific databases and other search engines, along with feedback from a patient advisory group (PAG).
English-language studies, commentaries, grey literature and other sources (including systematic and non-systematic reviews) pertaining to patient and public involvement in biomedical and health services research.
Study description (e.g. participant demographics, research setting) and design, if applicable; frameworks, conceptualizations or planning schemes for PSUE-related endeavours; and methods for PSUE initiation and gathering patients'/service users' input or contributions.
Overall, 202 sources were included and met eligibility criteria; 41 of these presented some framework or conceptualization of PSUE. Sources were synthesized into a two-part framework for PSUE: (i) integral PSUE components include patient and service user initiation, reciprocal relationships, colearning and re-assessment and feedback, (ii) sources describe PSUE at several research stages, within three larger phases: preparatory, execution and translational.
Efforts at developing a solid evidence base on PSUE are limited by the non-standard and non-empirical nature of much of the literature. Our proposed two-part framework provides a standard structure and language for reporting and indexing to support comparative effectiveness and optimize PSUE.
在生物医学和卫生服务研究中,患者及服务使用者参与度(PSUE)日益受到关注。现有语言和设计上的差异阻碍了报告和索引编制,而这对于确定最佳实践的比较效果至关重要。
本文利用系统评价和环境扫描得出一个基于证据的PSUE框架。
采用元叙事系统评价和环境扫描/手动检索,使用科学数据库和其他搜索引擎,并结合患者咨询小组(PAG)的反馈。
与患者和公众参与生物医学和卫生服务研究相关的英文研究、评论、灰色文献及其他来源(包括系统评价和非系统评价)。
研究描述(如参与者人口统计学、研究背景)及设计(如适用);PSUE相关工作的框架、概念化或规划方案;以及PSUE启动和收集患者/服务使用者意见或贡献的方法。
总体而言,202个来源符合纳入标准;其中41个呈现了PSUE的一些框架或概念化内容。这些来源被整合为一个两部分的PSUE框架:(i)PSUE的核心组成部分包括患者及服务使用者的启动、互惠关系、共同学习、重新评估和反馈;(ii)这些来源在三个更大的阶段(准备、执行和转化)的几个研究阶段描述了PSUE。
建立坚实的PSUE证据基础的努力受到许多文献的非标准和非实证性质的限制。我们提出的两部分框架为报告和索引编制提供了标准结构和语言,以支持比较效果并优化PSUE。