Tangney J P
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Oct;61(4):598-607. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.598.
The relations among 3 moral affective personality characteristics--shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and empathic responsiveness--were examined in 4 independent studies of undergraduates. Results indicate that shame and guilt are distinct affective experiences that have important and quite different implications in the interpersonal realm. There was a substantial positive correlation between shame-proneness and guilt-proneness. Nonetheless, as predicted, other-oriented empathic responsiveness was negatively related to proneness to shame but positively correlated with proneness to guilt. In contrast, an index of more self-oriented personal distress was positively linked to shame-proneness. Taken together, these results add a new dimension to the ugliness of shame but suggest that guilt may not be that bad after all, at least in the interpersonal domain.
在四项针对大学生的独立研究中,对三种道德情感人格特征——易羞耻感、易内疚感和共情反应能力——之间的关系进行了考察。结果表明,羞耻感和内疚感是不同的情感体验,在人际领域有着重要且截然不同的影响。易羞耻感和易内疚感之间存在显著的正相关。然而,正如所预测的那样,他人导向的共情反应能力与易羞耻感呈负相关,但与易内疚感呈正相关。相比之下,更自我导向的个人痛苦指数与易羞耻感呈正相关。综合来看,这些结果为羞耻感的丑恶增添了新的维度,但表明内疚感可能终究没那么糟糕,至少在人际领域是这样。