Haefliger I O, Flammer J
Clinique d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland.
Ophthalmology. 1991 Oct;98(10):1529-32. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32093-1.
The outcome of repeated measurements of the differential light sensitivity fluctuates slightly. This fluctuation can be markedly increased in glaucoma patients but has also been described at the border of the blind spot of healthy subjects. The question arises, therefore, whether in glaucoma this increase may be due to the fact that many test locations may touch the border of (detected or undetected) scotomas. This study compares the behavior of the threshold at the border of glaucomatous defects and blind spots. The threshold was measured with program F8 of the Octopus 201 (Interzeag, Inc, Schlieren, Switzerland) automated static perimeter. The results revealed that the borders of glaucomatous defects are less steep than those of blind spots, the fluctuation is largest just at the border of the scotomas in both groups, and that the fluctuation is significantly larger at the edge of glaucomatous defects than at the edge of blind spots of normal subjects.
对微分光敏感度的重复测量结果略有波动。在青光眼患者中,这种波动可能会显著增加,但在健康受试者盲点边界处也有相关描述。因此,问题在于,在青光眼中这种增加是否可能是由于许多测试位置可能触及(已检测到或未检测到的)暗点边界。本研究比较了青光眼性缺损边界和盲点处阈值的表现。使用Octopus 201(Interzeag公司,瑞士施利伦)自动静态视野计的F8程序测量阈值。结果显示,青光眼性缺损的边界不如盲点边界陡峭,两组在暗点边界处的波动最大,且青光眼性缺损边缘的波动明显大于正常受试者盲点边缘的波动。