• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概率心理模型:一种布伦斯维克式的置信理论。

Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.

作者信息

Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U, Kleinbölting H

机构信息

Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 1991 Oct;98(4):506-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506
PMID:1961771
Abstract

Research on people's confidence in their general knowledge has to date produced two fairly stable effects, many inconsistent results, and no comprehensive theory. We propose such a comprehensive framework, the theory of probabilistic mental models (PMM theory). The theory (a) explains both the overconfidence effect (mean confidence is higher than percentage of answers correct) and the hard-easy effect (overconfidence increases with item difficulty) reported in the literature and (b) predicts conditions under which both effects appear, disappear, or invert. In addition, (c) it predicts a new phenomenon, the confidence-frequency effect, a systematic difference between a judgment of confidence in a single event (i.e., that any given answer is correct) and a judgment of the frequency of correct answers in the long run. Two experiments are reported that support PMM theory by confirming these predictions, and several apparent anomalies reported in the literature are explained and integrated into the present framework.

摘要

迄今为止,关于人们对自身常识的信心的研究产生了两种相当稳定的效应、许多不一致的结果,且没有全面的理论。我们提出了这样一个全面的框架,即概率心理模型理论(PMM理论)。该理论(a)解释了文献中报道的过度自信效应(平均信心高于正确答案的百分比)和难易效应(过度自信随题目难度增加),并且(b)预测了这两种效应出现、消失或反转的条件。此外,(c)它预测了一种新现象,即信心-频率效应,即在对单个事件的信心判断(即任何给定答案是正确的)与对长期正确答案频率的判断之间存在系统差异。报告了两个实验,通过证实这些预测来支持PMM理论,并且解释了文献中报道的几个明显异常现象并将其纳入当前框架。

相似文献

1
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.概率心理模型:一种布伦斯维克式的置信理论。
Psychol Rev. 1991 Oct;98(4):506-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506.
2
People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).人们的条件概率判断遵循概率论(加上噪声)。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Sep;89:106-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.惊人的合理性:概率论加上噪声解释了判断中的偏差。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;121(3):463-80. doi: 10.1037/a0037010.
4
Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.概率论与噪声:描述性估计与推理判断。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;10(1):192-208. doi: 10.1111/tops.12319.
5
Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.概率判断中的惊人理性:评估两种竞争模型。
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:280-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
6
Integration of the ecological and error models of overconfidence using a multiple-trace memory model.使用多重痕迹记忆模型整合过度自信的生态模型和误差模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):579-99. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.579.
7
A behavioral demonstration of overconfidence in judgment.过度自信判断的行为表现
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1190-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797612470700. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
The self-consistency model of subjective confidence.主观信心的自洽性模型。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):80-113. doi: 10.1037/a0025648. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
9
A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.政治判断中顺序效应和合取谬误的量子理论解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1517-1525. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1371-z.
10
Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.概率估计中的随机变化和系统偏差。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Dec;123:101306. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101306. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
From a Measure of Confidence to a Measure of the Level of Knowledge.从信心度量到知识水平度量。
Psychol Belg. 2025 May 22;65(1):114-131. doi: 10.5334/pb.1332. eCollection 2025.
2
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.健康科学领域的德尔菲研究如何达成共识:一项范围综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 14;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.
3
The RepVig framework for designing use-case specific representative vignettes and evaluating triage accuracy of laypeople and symptom assessment applications.
用于设计特定用例代表性案例并评估非专业人员和症状评估应用程序分诊准确性的RepVig框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 23;14(1):30614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83844-z.
4
The Effect of Collaborative Triadic Conversations in Noise on Decision-Making in a General-Knowledge Task.噪声环境下协作性三方对话对常识任务决策的影响
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241305058. doi: 10.1177/23312165241305058.
5
The effects of non-diagnostic information on confidence and decision making.非诊断信息对信心和决策的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1182-1194. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01535-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
6
Relation of life sciences students' metacognitive monitoring to neural activity during biology error detection.生命科学专业学生在生物学错误检测过程中元认知监控与神经活动的关系
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00231-z.
7
Subjective Confidence as a Monitor of the Replicability of the Response.作为反应可重复性监测指标的主观信心
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;20(4):744-761. doi: 10.1177/17456916231224387. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
Putting the individual in the context of the organization: A Carnegie perspective on decision-making.将个体置于组织背景之中:卡内基学派的决策观点
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1165713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165713. eCollection 2023.
9
Majority rule can help solve difficult tasks even when confident members opt out to serve individual interests.多数原则有助于解决难题,即使有自信的成员选择退出以追求个人利益。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 8;13(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42080-7.
10
When Cognitive Reflection Leads to Less Overall but More Systematic Judgment Bias: The Case of the Base Rates Fallacy.当认知反思导致总体判断偏差减少但系统性判断偏差增加时:以基础概率谬误为例。
J Intell. 2023 May 24;11(6):100. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060100.