Kephart George, Asada Yukiko
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Centre for Clinical Research, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul 21;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-122.
A key policy objective in most publicly financed health care systems is to allocate resources according to need. Many jurisdictions implement this policy objective through need-based allocation models. To date, no gold standard exists for selecting need indicators. In the absence of a gold standard, sensitivity of the choice of need indicators is of concern. The primary objective of this study was to assess the consistency and plausibility of estimates of per capita relative need for health services across Canadian provinces based on different need indicators.
Using the 2000/2001 Canadian Community Health Survey, we estimated relative per capita need for general practitioner, specialist, and hospital services by province using two approaches that incorporated a different set of need indicators: (1) demographics (age and sex), and (2) demographics, socioeconomic status, and health status. For both approaches, we first fitted regression models to estimate standard utilization of each of three types of health services by indicators of need. We defined the standard as average levels of utilization by needs indicators in the national sample. Subsequently, we estimated expected per capita utilization of each type of health services in each province. We compared these estimates of per capita relative need with premature mortality in each province to check their face validity.
Both approaches suggested that expected relative per capita need for three services vary across provinces. Different approaches, however, yielded different and inconsistent results. Moreover, provincial per capita relative need for the three health services did not always indicate the same direction of need suggested by premature mortality in each province. In particular, the two approaches suggested Newfoundland had less need than the Canadian average for all three services, but it had the highest premature mortality in Canada.
Substantial differences in need for health care may exist across Canadian provinces, but the direction and magnitude of differences depend on the need indicators used. Allocations from models using survey data lacked face validity for some provinces. These results call for the need to better understand the biases that may result from the use of survey data for resource allocation.
大多数公共财政资助的医疗保健系统的一个关键政策目标是根据需求分配资源。许多司法管辖区通过基于需求的分配模型来实现这一政策目标。迄今为止,尚无选择需求指标的金标准。在没有金标准的情况下,需求指标选择的敏感性令人担忧。本研究的主要目的是评估基于不同需求指标的加拿大各省人均相对医疗服务需求估计的一致性和合理性。
利用2000/2001年加拿大社区健康调查,我们采用两种纳入不同需求指标集的方法,按省份估计了全科医生、专科医生和医院服务的人均相对需求:(1)人口统计学特征(年龄和性别),以及(2)人口统计学特征、社会经济地位和健康状况。对于这两种方法,我们首先拟合回归模型,以通过需求指标估计三种医疗服务各自的标准利用率。我们将标准定义为全国样本中需求指标的平均利用水平。随后,我们估计了每个省份每种医疗服务的预期人均利用率。我们将这些人均相对需求估计值与每个省份的过早死亡率进行比较,以检验其表面效度。
两种方法均表明,三个服务的预期人均相对需求因省份而异。然而,不同的方法得出了不同且不一致的结果。此外,三个医疗服务的省级人均相对需求并不总是表明每个省份过早死亡率所暗示的相同需求方向。特别是,两种方法均表明,纽芬兰对所有三种服务的需求低于加拿大平均水平,但它却是加拿大过早死亡率最高的省份。
加拿大各省的医疗保健需求可能存在很大差异,但差异的方向和程度取决于所使用的需求指标。使用调查数据的模型分配对某些省份缺乏表面效度。这些结果表明有必要更好地了解使用调查数据进行资源分配可能产生的偏差。