Salihu Hamisu M, Mbah Alfred K, Alio Amina P, Kornosky Jennifer L, Bruder Karen, Belogolovkin Victoria
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Community and Family Health, and The Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and Babies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):333-339. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae9a47.
To estimate the distribution and success of programmed fetal growth phenotypes among obese women.
This was a retrospective cohort study using the Missouri maternally linked cohort files (years 1978-1997). Maternal body mass index was classified as Normal (18.5-24.9) (referent group), Obese (class 1, 30.0-34.9; class 2, 35.0-39.9; and extreme or class 3, 40 or more). Fetal growth phenotypes were defined as large for gestational age (LGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA), and small for gestational age (SGA). We used adjusted odds ratio with correction for intracluster correlation to estimate the risk of neonatal mortality for each fetal growth phenotype.
As compared with normal weight mothers, obese gravidas tended to program LGA infants at a higher and increasing rate with ascending obesity severity. The opposite effect was observed with respect to AGA and SGA programming patterns. Neonatal mortality among LGA infants was similar for obese (6.2 in 1,000) and normal (4.9 in 1,000) weight mothers (OR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.48) and regardless of obesity subtype. By contrast, SGA and AGA infants programmed by obese mothers experienced greater neonatal mortality as compared with those born to normal weight mothers (AGA OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.32-1.59; SGA OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.49-1.98).
Compared with normal weight mothers, obese women are least successful at programming SGA, less successful at programming AGA, and equally as successful at programming LGA infants.
II.
评估肥胖女性中程序化胎儿生长表型的分布及成功情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用密苏里州母婴关联队列文件(1978 - 1997年)。孕妇体重指数分为正常(18.5 - 24.9)(参照组)、肥胖(1类,30.0 - 34.9;2类,35.0 - 39.9;及极端或3类,40及以上)。胎儿生长表型定义为大于胎龄儿(LGA)、适于胎龄儿(AGA)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)。我们使用校正了组内相关的调整优势比来估计每种胎儿生长表型的新生儿死亡风险。
与体重正常的母亲相比,肥胖孕妇随着肥胖严重程度的增加,程序化产生LGA婴儿的比例更高且呈上升趋势。在AGA和SGA程序化模式方面观察到相反的效果。肥胖(每1000例中有6.2例)和体重正常(每1000例中有4.9例)母亲所生LGA婴儿的新生儿死亡率相似(优势比1.05,95%置信区间[CI] 0.75 - 1.48),且与肥胖亚型无关。相比之下,肥胖母亲程序化产生的SGA和AGA婴儿与体重正常母亲所生婴儿相比,经历了更高的新生儿死亡率(AGA优势比1.45,95% CI 1.32 - 1.59;SGA优势比1.72,95% CI 1.49 - 1.98)。
与体重正常的母亲相比,肥胖女性在程序化产生SGA方面最不成功,在程序化产生AGA方面较不成功,而在程序化产生LGA婴儿方面同样成功。
II级。