Nederkoorn Paul J, Brown Martin M
Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-36.
Carotid angioplasty with stenting is a relatively new, increasingly used, less-invasive treatment for the treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. It is being evaluated in ongoing and nearly finished randomized trials. An important factor in the evaluation of stents is the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. An un-stented carotid artery is likely to have a more elastic vessel wall than a stented one, even if stenosis is present. Therefore, duplex ultrasound cut-off criteria for the degrees of an in-stent stenosis, based on blood velocity parameters, are probably different from the established cut-offs used for un-stented arteries. Routine criteria can not be applied to stented arteries but new criteria need to be established for this particular purpose.
METHODS/DESIGN: Current literature was systematically reviewed. From the selected studies, the following data were extracted: publication year, population size, whether the study was prospective, duplex ultrasound cut-off criteria reported, which reference test was used, and if there was an indication for selection bias and for verification bias in particular. Previous studies often were retrospective, or the reference test (DSA or CTA) was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at DUS, which may result in verification bias. :
In general, the velocity cut-off values for stenosis measurements in stented arteries were higher than those reported for unstented arteries. Previous studies often were retrospective, or the reference test (DSA or CTA) was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at DUS, which may result in verification bias.
To address the deficiencies of the existing studies, we propose a prospective cohort study nested within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS), an international multi-centre trial in which over 1,700 patients have been randomised between stenting and CEA. In this cohort we will enrol a minimum of 300 patients treated with a stent. All patients undergo regular DUS examination at the yearly follow-up visit according to the ICSS protocol. To avoid verification bias, an additional computed tomography angiography (CTA) will be performed as a reference test in all consecutive patients, regardless of the degree of stenosis on the initial DUS test.
颈动脉血管成形术加支架置入术是一种相对较新的、使用越来越多的、用于治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的侵入性较小的治疗方法。它正在正在进行和即将完成的随机试验中进行评估。评估支架的一个重要因素是支架内再狭窄的发生。即使存在狭窄,未置入支架的颈动脉的血管壁可能比置入支架的颈动脉更具弹性。因此,基于血流速度参数的支架内狭窄程度的双功超声截断标准可能与用于未置入支架动脉的既定截断标准不同。常规标准不能应用于置入支架的动脉,但需要为此特定目的建立新的标准。
方法/设计:对当前文献进行了系统综述。从选定的研究中,提取了以下数据:发表年份、样本量、研究是否为前瞻性、报告的双功超声截断标准、使用了哪种参考测试,以及是否存在选择偏倚特别是验证偏倚的迹象。以前的研究通常是回顾性的,或者仅在患者在双功超声检查中被怀疑有再狭窄时才进行参考测试(数字减影血管造影或CT血管造影),这可能导致验证偏倚。
一般来说, 置入支架动脉狭窄测量的速度截断值高于未置入支架动脉报告的截断值。以前的研究通常是回顾性的,或者仅在患者在双功超声检查中被怀疑有再狭窄时才进行参考测试(数字减影血管造影或CT血管造影),这可能导致验证偏倚。
为了解决现有研究的不足,我们提议在国际颈动脉支架置入研究(ICSS)中进行一项前瞻性队列研究,ICSS是一项国际多中心试验,超过1700名患者已在支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术之间进行了随机分组。在这个队列中,我们将招募至少300名接受支架治疗的患者。根据ICSS方案,所有患者在每年的随访中都要接受定期的双功超声检查。为了避免验证偏倚,将对所有连续患者进行额外的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)作为参考测试,无论初始双功超声检查的狭窄程度如何。