• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症与支架内再狭窄:血清标志物与支架特征在颈动脉支架置入术中的作用。

Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022683. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0022683
PMID:21829478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3145657/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) may currently be recommended especially in younger patients with a high-grade carotid artery stenosis. However, evidence is accumulating that in-stent restenosis (ISR) could be an important factor endangering the long-term efficacy of CAS. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of inflammatory serum markers and procedure-related factors on ISR as diagnosed with duplex sonography.

METHODS

We analyzed 210 CAS procedures in 194 patients which were done at a single university hospital between May 2003 and June 2010. Periprocedural C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count as well as stent design and geometry, and other periprocedural factors were analyzed with respect to the occurrence of an ISR as diagnosed with serial carotid duplex ultrasound investigations during clinical long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Over a median of 33.4 months follow-up (IQR: 14.9-53.7) of 210 procedures (mean age of 67.9±9.7 years, 71.9% male, 71.0% symptomatic) an ISR of ≥70% was detected in 5.7% after a median of 8.6 months (IQR: 3.4-17.3). After multiple regression analysis, leukocyte count after CAS-intervention (odds ratio (OR): 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.69; p = 0.036), as well as stent length and width were associated with the development of an ISR during follow-up (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.05-1.65, p = 0.022 and OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.84, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ISR during long-term follow-up after CAS occur within the first year. ISR is associated with periinterventional inflammation markers and influenced by certain stent characteristics such as stent length and width. Our findings support the assumption that stent geometry leading to vessel injury as well as periprocedural inflammation during CAS plays a pivotal role in the development of carotid artery ISR.

摘要

背景

颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)目前可能特别适用于伴有重度颈动脉狭窄的年轻患者。然而,越来越多的证据表明支架内再狭窄(ISR)可能是危及 CAS 长期疗效的重要因素。本研究旨在通过双功能超声检查调查炎症性血清标志物和与操作相关的因素对 ISR 的影响。

方法

我们分析了 2003 年 5 月至 2010 年 6 月在一家大学医院进行的 210 例 CAS 手术的 194 例患者。分析了围手术期 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数,以及支架设计和几何形状以及其他围手术期因素,这些因素与临床长期随访期间的连续颈动脉双功能超声检查诊断的 ISR 发生情况有关。

结果

210 例手术的中位随访时间为 33.4 个月(IQR:14.9-53.7),平均年龄为 67.9±9.7 岁,71.9%为男性,71.0%有症状。在中位时间为 8.6 个月(IQR:3.4-17.3)后,有 5.7%的患者检测到 ISR≥70%。经过多因素回归分析,CAS 干预后的白细胞计数(比值比(OR):1.31,95%置信区间(CI):1.02-1.69;p=0.036)以及支架长度和宽度与随访期间 ISR 的发展相关(OR:1.25,95%CI:1.05-1.65,p=0.022 和 OR:0.28,95%CI:0.09-0.84,p=0.010)。

结论

CAS 后长期随访期间,大多数 ISR 在一年内发生。ISR 与围手术期炎症标志物相关,并受支架特征(如支架长度和宽度)影响。我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即导致血管损伤的支架几何形状以及 CAS 期间的围手术期炎症在颈动脉 ISR 的发展中起着关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2fe/3145657/d153e649b767/pone.0022683.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2fe/3145657/d153e649b767/pone.0022683.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2fe/3145657/d153e649b767/pone.0022683.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting.炎症与支架内再狭窄:血清标志物与支架特征在颈动脉支架置入术中的作用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022683. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
2
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
3
Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis.颈动脉支架内再狭窄的临床影响和预测因素。
J Neurol. 2012 Sep;259(9):1896-902. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6436-3. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
4
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
5
Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study.经颅多普勒超声检测颈动脉狭窄支架成形术(CAS)前斑块形态与颈动脉支架内再狭窄无相关性:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Neurol. 2013 Nov 5;13:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-163.
6
Preprocedural Carotid Plaque Echolucency as a Predictor of In-Stent Intimal Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术前颈动脉斑块回声强度与支架内内膜再狭窄的关系。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105339. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105339. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort.颈动脉狭窄介入治疗后支架内再狭窄:单中心队列的长期随访。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1078-1. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Multicenter Experience of Surgical Explantation of Carotid Stents for Recurrent Stenosis.颈动脉支架再狭窄手术取出术的多中心经验
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Nov;50(8):547-553. doi: 10.1177/1538574416677668. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Carotid endarterectomy for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后支架内再狭窄。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.118. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
10
In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a challenge for the vascular surgeon.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后的支架内再狭窄:血管外科医生面临的一项挑战。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Jun;29(6):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.01.033.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment and validation of a clinical prediction model for in-stent restenosis after intracranial and extracranial stent implantation.颅内和颅外支架植入术后支架内再狭窄临床预测模型的建立与验证
Front Neurol. 2025 May 9;16:1516274. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1516274. eCollection 2025.
2
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma Predicts Carotid in-Stent Restenosis: Development and Validation of a Nomogram.血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数可预测颈动脉支架内再狭窄:列线图的构建与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 25;17:263-274. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S447008. eCollection 2024.
3
Recanalization of chronic long-segment occlusion of the internal carotid artery with endovascular and hybrid surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS.年龄改变了症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的相对风险——EVA-3S、SPACE 和 ICSS 的汇总分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review.与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术期间发生中风或死亡相关的解剖学和技术因素:症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术(EVA-3S)试验和系统评价的结果。
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):380-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588772. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
3
血管内和杂交手术再通慢性长段颈内动脉闭塞。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(1):17026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44406-x.
4
The preoperative triglyceride-glucose index has a positive effect on predicting the risk of short-term restenosis after carotid artery stenting: a retrospective cohort study.术前甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对预测颈动脉支架置入术后短期再狭窄风险具有积极作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1159601. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1159601. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of stent shape on focal hemodynamics in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A simulation study with computational fluid dynamics modeling.支架形状对颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄局部血流动力学的影响:一项基于计算流体动力学建模的模拟研究
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 13;13:1067566. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1067566. eCollection 2022.
6
Combining data acquisition modes in liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for comprehensive determination of acylcarnitines in human serum.液相色谱-串联质谱联用技术中数据采集模式的联合应用于血清酰基肉碱的全面测定。
Metabolomics. 2022 Jul 21;18(8):59. doi: 10.1007/s11306-022-01916-5.
7
Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with higher incidence of acute kidney injury and worse survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高与经导管主动脉瓣植入术后急性肾损伤的较高发生率及较差生存率相关。
Cardiol J. 2021 Nov 17;30(6):938-45. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0149.
8
A critical appraisal of humanized alternatives to fetal bovine serum for clinical applications of umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stromal cells.对人源替代物替代胎牛血清用于脐带间充质干细胞临床应用的批判性评价。
Biotechnol Lett. 2021 Oct;43(10):2067-2083. doi: 10.1007/s10529-021-03180-4. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Long-Term Risk Factors for Intracranial In-Stent Restenosis From a Multicenter Trial of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis Registry in China.来自中国症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架置入登记多中心试验的颅内支架内再狭窄长期危险因素
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 26;11:601199. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.601199. eCollection 2020.
10
The association of preprocedural C-reactive protein/albumin ratio with in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing iliac artery stenting.髂动脉支架置入患者术前C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值与支架内再狭窄的相关性
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12(3):179-184. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.31. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association.心脏病和中风统计数据--2011 年更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告。
Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):e18-e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
4
Short-term outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned meta-analysis of individual patient data.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入与内膜切除术的短期结局:一项个体化患者数据的预先计划的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1062-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61009-4. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
5
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
6
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid stenosis: a Cochrane review.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入治疗颈动脉狭窄:一项Cochrane系统评价
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 May;81(5):477-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.144956. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
7
Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术与支架置入术的短期和中期比较:随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Feb 12;340:c467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c467.
8
Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study.用于诊断颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的双功超声最佳截断标准:综述及一项诊断研究方案
BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-36.
9
Elevated levels of pre-procedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein is associated with midterm restenosis after extra- and intracranial stenting.术前高敏 C 反应蛋白水平升高与颅内外支架置入后中期再狭窄有关。
J Neuroimaging. 2010 Jan;20(1):74-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00313.x. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
10
Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.支架保护血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状狭窄2年的结果:一项多国、前瞻性、随机试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):893-902. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70196-0. Epub 2008 Sep 5.