Bosch Floris Tm, Hendrikse Jeroen, Davagnanam Indran, Bonati Leo H, van der Lugt Aad, van der Worp H B, de Borst Gert J, Mali Willem, Brown Martin M, Nederkoorn Paul J
Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMCU, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Mar;2(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/2396987316678361. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
Previous studies that reported duplex-ultrasound cut-off criteria, based on blood velocity parameters, for the degree of stenosis in a stented carotid artery were either retrospective, or the reference test was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at duplex ultrasound, which is likely to have resulted in verification bias. We performed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy to find new blood velocity cut-offs in duplex ultrasound for in-stent restenosis.
Stented patients within the international carotid stenting study were eligible. Patients had a carotid computed tomography angiography in addition to routine duplex ultrasound performed at a yearly follow-up. Duplex-ultrasound bloodflow velocity parameters were compared to the degree of stenosis on computed tomography angiography. The results were analysed using receiver-operating-characteristic curves.
We included 103 patients in this study. On computed tomography angiography, 30 (29.1%) patients had a 30%-49% in-stent restenosis, 21 (20.4%) patients had 50%-69% in-stent restenosis and 5 (4.9%) patients a ≥70% in-stent restenosis. The cut-off value ≥50% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of 125 cm/s (sensitivity: 63% (95% CI: 41-79), specificity: 83% (95% CI: 72-90)).
This study provides a level 2b evidence for new cut-off values for in-stent restenosis. Unfortunately, we could not say anything about severe stenosis because of the low number of severe stenosis after one year.
The 125 cm/s cut-off value on duplex ultrasound is lower than found in previous studies and equal to unstented arteries. Duplex-ultrasound measurements made in stented carotid arteries should not be corrected for the presence of a stent when determining the degree of stenosis.
以往基于血流速度参数报告支架置入后颈动脉狭窄程度的双功超声截断标准的研究,要么是回顾性的,要么仅在双功超声怀疑患者有再狭窄时才进行参考检测,这可能导致了验证偏倚。我们进行了一项诊断准确性的前瞻性研究,以寻找双功超声中支架内再狭窄的新血流速度截断值。
国际颈动脉支架置入研究中的支架置入患者符合条件。患者在每年随访时除了进行常规双功超声检查外,还进行了颈动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影。将双功超声血流速度参数与计算机断层扫描血管造影上的狭窄程度进行比较。使用受试者操作特征曲线分析结果。
本研究纳入了103例患者。在计算机断层扫描血管造影上,30例(29.1%)患者存在30%-49%的支架内再狭窄,21例(20.4%)患者存在50%-69%的支架内再狭窄,5例(4.9%)患者存在≥70%的支架内再狭窄。狭窄≥50%的截断值为收缩期峰值速度125 cm/s(敏感性:63%(95%CI:41-79),特异性:83%(95%CI:72-90))。
本研究为支架内再狭窄的新截断值提供了2b级证据。遗憾的是,由于一年后严重狭窄的病例数较少,我们无法对严重狭窄情况发表任何看法。
双功超声125 cm/s的截断值低于以往研究中的值,与未置入支架的动脉相同。在确定支架置入后颈动脉狭窄程度时,不应因存在支架而对双功超声测量结果进行校正。