• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主观全面评定法在中国胃肠道癌患者中的临床应用

Clinical application of subjective global assessment in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

作者信息

Wu Bei-Wen, Yin Tao, Cao Wei-Xin, Gu Zhi-Dong, Wang Xiao-Jin, Yan Min, Liu Bing-Ya

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3542-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3542.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.15.3542
PMID:19630112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2715983/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the role of subjective global assessment (SGA) in nutritional assessment and outcome prediction of Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 751 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer between August 2004 and August 2006 were enrolled in this study. Within 72 h after admission, SGA, anthropometric parameters, and laboratory tests were used to assess the nutritional status of each patient. The outcome variables including hospital stay, complications, and in-hospital medical expenditure were also obtained.

RESULTS

Based on the results of SGA, 389 (51.8%), 332 (44.2%), and 30 (4.0%) patients were classified into well nourished group (SGA-A), mildly to moderately malnourished group (SGA-B), and severely malnourished group (SGA-C), respectively. The prevalence of malnutrition classified by SGA, triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and body mass index (BMI) was 48.2%, 39.4%, 37.7%, 31.3%, 21.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. In addition, ANOVA tests revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), TSF, PA, and ALB of patients in different SGA groups. The more severely malnourished the patient was, the lower the levels of BMI, TSF, PA, and ALB were (P < 0.05). Chi2 tests showed a significant difference in SGA classification between patients receiving different types of treatment (surgery vs chemotherapy/radiotherapy). As the nutritional status classified by SGA deteriorated, the patients stayed longer in hospital and their medical expenditures increased significantly. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis showed that SGA and serum ALB could help predict the medical expenditures and hospital stay of patients undergoing surgery. The occurrence of complications increased in parallel with the increasing grade of SGA, and was the highest in the SGA-C group (23.3%) and the lowest in the SGA-A group (16.8%).

CONCLUSION

SGA is a reliable assessment tool and helps to predict the hospital stay and medical expenditures of Chinese surgical gastrointestinal cancer patients.

摘要

目的

探讨主观全面评定法(SGA)在中国胃肠道癌患者营养评估及预后预测中的作用。

方法

选取2004年8月至2006年8月期间确诊的751例胃肠道癌患者纳入本研究。入院后72小时内,采用SGA、人体测量参数及实验室检查评估每位患者的营养状况。同时获取包括住院时间、并发症及住院医疗费用等结局变量。

结果

根据SGA结果,分别有389例(51.8%)、332例(44.2%)和30例(4.0%)患者被分为营养良好组(SGA - A)、轻度至中度营养不良组(SGA - B)和重度营养不良组(SGA - C)。按SGA、三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)、上臂中部肌肉周长(MAMC)、白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PA)及体重指数(BMI)分类的营养不良患病率分别为48.2%、39.4%、37.7%、31.3%、21.7%和9.6%。此外,方差分析显示不同SGA组患者的体重指数(BMI)、TSF、PA和ALB存在显著差异。患者营养不良越严重,BMI、TSF、PA和ALB水平越低(P < 0.05)。卡方检验显示接受不同治疗类型(手术与化疗/放疗)的患者在SGA分类上存在显著差异。随着SGA分类的营养状况恶化,患者住院时间延长且医疗费用显著增加。此外,多元回归分析表明SGA和血清ALB有助于预测手术患者的医疗费用和住院时间。并发症的发生率随SGA等级升高而增加,在SGA - C组最高(23.3%),在SGA - A组最低(16.8%)。

结论

SGA是一种可靠的评估工具,有助于预测中国胃肠道癌手术患者的住院时间和医疗费用。

相似文献

1
Clinical application of subjective global assessment in Chinese patients with gastrointestinal cancer.主观全面评定法在中国胃肠道癌患者中的临床应用
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3542-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3542.
2
Validation of the Chinese version of the Subjective Global Assessment scale of nutritional status in a sample of patients with gastrointestinal cancer.验证中文版主观整体评估营养状况量表在胃肠道癌症患者样本中的适用性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
3
Nutrition assessment in critically ill patients.危重症患者的营养评估
Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(6):635-41. doi: 10.1177/0884533608326137.
4
[Optimal nutritional status assessment parameters in gastroenterological patients on hospital admission].[胃肠病患者入院时的最佳营养状况评估参数]
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2007 Aug;64(8):549-53. doi: 10.2298/vsp0708549r.
5
[Comparative study on nutritional status of patients in intensive care unit with different assessment tools].[不同评估工具对重症监护病房患者营养状况的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):72-77. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20190923-00013.
6
Nutritional screening with Subjective Global Assessment predicts hospital stay in patients with digestive diseases.采用主观全面评定法进行营养筛查可预测消化系统疾病患者的住院时间。
Nutrition. 2007 Sep;23(9):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
7
Nutritional status among adult patients admitted to an university-affiliated hospital in Spain at the time of genoma.西班牙一家大学附属医院收治的成年患者在进行基因组检测时的营养状况。
Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;23(5):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.01.003.
8
Effectiveness of different tools for malnutrition in the assessment of patients with cirrhosis.不同工具在评估肝硬化患者营养不良中的有效性。
Am J Med Sci. 2024 Jul;368(1):61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
The Pediatric Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment Classifies More Children With Cerebral Palsy as Malnourished Compared With Anthropometry.与人体测量学相比,儿科主观整体营养评估方法将更多脑瘫儿童归类为营养不良。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Nov;120(11):1893-1901. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
SGA and measures for muscle mass and strength in surgical Vietnamese patients.越南外科手术患者的小于胎龄儿及肌肉质量和力量的测量指标
Nutrition. 2007 Apr;23(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of nutritional status of patients receiving chemotherapy: sample from European Gaza hospital.对接受化疗患者营养状况的评估:来自欧洲加沙医院的样本。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14571-5.
2
Is nutritional status a new indicator to use in clinical practice for colorectal cancer patients?营养状况是否是用于临床实践中评估结直肠癌患者的一项新指标?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):4537-4542. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i12.4537.
3
Subjective global assessment for nutritional screening and its impact on surgical outcomes: A prospective study in older patients with colorectal cancer.主观整体评估在营养筛查中的应用及其对结直肠癌老年患者手术结局的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 25;409(1):356. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03548-w.
4
Nutritional Assessment Tools for Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review.癌症患者的营养评估工具:一项叙述性综述。
Curr Med Sci. 2024 Feb;44(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2808-4. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
5
Factors Associated With Malnutrition in Hospitalized Cancer Patients in a National Oncology Center in Conflict-Affected Settings in Sana'a, Yemen: An Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study.也门萨那受冲突影响地区一家国家肿瘤中心住院癌症患者营养不良的相关因素:一项基于机构的横断面研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 17;15(9):e45411. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45411. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Performance of a simplified nutrition screening tool for outpatient radiotherapy cancer patients.简化版营养筛查工具在外放疗癌症患者中的应用表现。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033778.
7
Stratification of Length of Stay Prediction following Surgical Cytoreduction in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients Using Artificial Intelligence; the Leeds L-AI-OS Score.基于人工智能的高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者手术后细胞减灭术住院时间预测的分层;利兹 L-AI-OS 评分。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 23;29(12):9088-9104. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120711.
8
The Determination of a Consensus Nutritional Approach for Cancer Patients in Spain Using the Delphi Methodology.采用德尔菲法确定西班牙癌症患者的共识营养方法。
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 28;14(7):1404. doi: 10.3390/nu14071404.
9
The correlation between skeletal muscle index of the L3 vertebral body and malnutrition in patients with advanced lung cancer.第 3 腰椎椎体骨骼肌指数与晚期肺癌患者营养不良的相关性。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 26;21(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08876-4.
10
Nutritional Status and Feeding Regimen of Patients with Esophagus Cancer-A Study from Vietnam.越南食管癌患者的营养状况与喂养方案——一项研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 6;9(3):289. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030289.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutritional support during oncologic treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancer: who could benefit?胃肠道癌患者肿瘤治疗期间的营养支持:哪些患者可能受益?
Cancer Treat Rev. 2008 Oct;34(6):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 1.
2
Nutritional screening with Subjective Global Assessment predicts hospital stay in patients with digestive diseases.采用主观全面评定法进行营养筛查可预测消化系统疾病患者的住院时间。
Nutrition. 2007 Sep;23(9):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
3
Is serum albumin a good marker for malnutrition in the physically impaired elderly?血清白蛋白是否是身体受损老年人营养不良的良好标志物?
Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;26(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
4
Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research directions.临床实践中的营养支持:已发表数据综述及未来研究方向建议
Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;16(4):193-218. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(97)80006-4.
5
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Liver disease.欧洲临床营养与代谢学会(ESPEN)肝病肠内营养指南
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 May 16.
6
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation.欧洲临床营养和代谢学会肠内营养指南:外科手术,包括器官移植
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):224-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015. Epub 2006 May 15.
7
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Gastroenterology.欧洲临床营养和代谢学会肠内营养指南:胃肠病学
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 May 15.
8
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Adult renal failure.欧洲临床营养与代谢学会成人肾衰竭肠内营养指南
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):295-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.023. Epub 2006 May 12.
9
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care.欧洲临床营养和代谢学会(ESPEN)肠内营养指南:重症监护
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.021. Epub 2006 May 11.
10
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Cardiology and pulmonology.欧洲临床营养与代谢学会肠内营养指南:心脏病学与肺病学
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.017. Epub 2006 May 11.