• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国医院和养老院中的压疮风险与压疮患病率]

[Pressure ulcer risk and pressure ulcer prevalence in German hospitals and nursing homes].

作者信息

Hoppe Christina, Kottner Jan, Dassen Theo, Lahmann Nils

机构信息

Institut für Medizin-/Pflegepädagogik und Pflegewissenschaft der Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.

出版信息

Pflege Z. 2009 Jul;62(7):424-8.

PMID:19634526
Abstract

In the spring of 2008, the "Institut für Medizin-/Pflegepädagogik und Pflegewissenschaft der Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin" conducted a nationwide prevalence study for the seventh time. Among other things, data was collected concerning pressure ulcer risk and pressure ulcer prevalence in German nursing homes and hospitals. 3345 residents from 37 nursing homes and 3391 patients from 19 hospitals were included in this study. Altogether, 3192 of them were at risk for pressure ulcers. In nursing homes, the percentage of persons at risk for pressure ulcer development was 62.5 percent, in hospitals 39.4 percent. 297 persons from the at risk group had at least one pressure ulcer. Pressure ulcer prevalence in hospitals was 12.7 percent and in the nursing homes 7.3 percent, respectively. Concerning pressure ulcer risk and pressure ulcer prevalence, there were considerable differences between individual hospitals and departments. Even with comparable risk groups, differences in pressure ulcer prevalence were found.

摘要

2008年春,“柏林夏里特大学医学护理教育与护理科学研究所”第七次开展了一项全国性患病率研究。除其他事项外,还收集了德国养老院和医院中压疮风险及压疮患病率的数据。本研究纳入了来自37家养老院的3345名居民和来自19家医院的3391名患者。其中共有3192人有发生压疮的风险。在养老院中,有发生压疮风险的人员比例为62.5%,在医院中为39.4%。有风险组中的297人至少有一处压疮。医院中的压疮患病率分别为12.7%,养老院中的为7.3%。关于压疮风险和压疮患病率,各医院和科室之间存在相当大的差异。即使在风险组相当的情况下,也发现了压疮患病率的差异。

相似文献

1
[Pressure ulcer risk and pressure ulcer prevalence in German hospitals and nursing homes].[德国医院和养老院中的压疮风险与压疮患病率]
Pflege Z. 2009 Jul;62(7):424-8.
2
[Pressure ulcers: new data about risk, prevalence and places of development. Results of a study in German nursing homes and hospitals].[压疮:关于风险、患病率及发生部位的新数据。德国疗养院和医院的一项研究结果]
Pflege Z. 2008 Feb;61(2):90-3.
3
[Pressure ulcer prevalence in German nursing homes and hospitals: what role does the National Nursing Expert Standard Prevention of Pressure Ulcer play?].[德国疗养院和医院中压疮的患病率:国家护理专家压疮预防标准起到了什么作用?]
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Apr;72(4):240-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220757. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
4
[Pressure ulcer prevalence in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study in 2006].[德国压疮患病率:2006年横断面研究结果]
Pflege Z. 2007 Jan;60(1):28-31.
5
[Pressure ulcer prevalence: comparison between nursing homes and hospitals].[压疮患病率:养老院与医院的比较]
Pflege Z. 2010 Apr;63(4):228-31.
6
[Pressure in nursing care: Outcomes of a prevalence study of pressure ulcers in Austrian hospitals and nursing homes].[护理中的压力:奥地利医院和养老院压疮患病率研究的结果]
Pflege Z. 2011 Jun;64(6):356-61.
7
Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics.德国养老院和急症护理医院中的压疮:患病率、发生频率及溃疡特征。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Feb;52(2):20-33.
8
Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.解释荷兰和德国之间压疮患病率的国家差异——根据个人风险因素和机构质量指标进行调整。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00958.x.
9
Differences in prevalence of pressure ulcers between the Netherlands and Germany--associations between risk, prevention and occurrence of pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes.荷兰与德国压力性溃疡患病率的差异——医院和养老院中压力性溃疡的风险、预防与发生之间的关联
J Clin Nurs. 2008 May;17(9):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02225.x.
10
Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany.德国压疮的患病率。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Feb;14(2):165-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01037.x.