• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测中重度抑郁症药物治疗和认知疗法的反应。

Prediction of response to medication and cognitive therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe depression.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):775-87. doi: 10.1037/a0015401.

DOI:10.1037/a0015401
PMID:19634969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2810269/
Abstract

A recent randomized controlled trial found nearly equivalent response rates for antidepressant medications and cognitive therapy in a sample of moderate to severely depressed outpatients. In this article, the authors seek to identify the variables that were associated with response across both treatments as well as variables that predicted superior response in one treatment over the other. The sample consisted of 180 depressed outpatients: 60 of whom were randomly assigned to cognitive therapy; 120 were assigned to antidepressant medications. Treatment was provided for 16 weeks. Chronic depression, older age, and lower intelligence each predicted relatively poor response across both treatments. Three prescriptive variables-marriage, unemployment, and having experienced a greater number of recent life events-were identified, and each predicted superior response to cognitive therapy relative to antidepressant medications. Thus, 6 markers of treatment outcome were identified, each of which might be expected to carry considerable clinical utility. The 3 prognostic variables identify subgroups that might benefit from alternative treatment strategies; the 3 prescriptive variables identify groups who appear to respond particularly well to cognitive therapy.

摘要

最近一项随机对照试验发现,在中度至重度抑郁门诊患者样本中,抗抑郁药物和认知疗法的反应率几乎相当。在本文中,作者试图确定与两种治疗方法均相关的反应变量,以及预测一种治疗方法优于另一种治疗方法的反应的变量。该样本包括 180 名抑郁门诊患者:其中 60 名被随机分配到认知疗法组;120 名被分配到抗抑郁药物组。治疗持续 16 周。慢性抑郁、年龄较大和智力较低都预示着两种治疗方法的反应都相对较差。确定了三个规定性变量——婚姻、失业和经历了更多近期生活事件——每个变量都预示着认知疗法相对于抗抑郁药物的反应更好。因此,确定了 6 个治疗结果的标志物,每个标志物都可能具有相当大的临床应用价值。这 3 个预后变量确定了可能受益于替代治疗策略的亚组;这 3 个规定性变量确定了对认知疗法反应特别好的群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/023ae345a980/nihms165337f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/c86e6ef20eeb/nihms165337f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/1c7e5beaccae/nihms165337f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/c34fd5ec3ddb/nihms165337f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/023ae345a980/nihms165337f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/c86e6ef20eeb/nihms165337f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/1c7e5beaccae/nihms165337f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/c34fd5ec3ddb/nihms165337f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0359/2810269/023ae345a980/nihms165337f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of response to medication and cognitive therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe depression.预测中重度抑郁症药物治疗和认知疗法的反应。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):775-87. doi: 10.1037/a0015401.
2
Select comorbid personality disorders and the treatment of chronic depression with nefazodone, targeted psychotherapy, or their combination.选择共病的人格障碍以及使用奈法唑酮、针对性心理治疗或两者联合治疗慢性抑郁症。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Oct;117(3):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Chronic depression: update on classification and treatment.慢性抑郁症:分类与治疗的最新进展
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008 Dec;10(6):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-008-0074-6.
4
Characterizing the long-term course of individuals with major depressive disorder.描述重度抑郁症患者的长期病程。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Jan;192(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000106002.64838.1c.
5
[Cognitive behavioral therapy for depressed older outpatients--a controlled, randomized trial].老年门诊抑郁症患者的认知行为疗法——一项对照随机试验
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Dec;37(6):427-35. doi: 10.1007/s00391-004-0262-x.
6
The Treatment of Adolescent Suicide Attempters study (TASA): predictors of suicidal events in an open treatment trial.青少年自杀未遂者治疗研究(TASA):开放性治疗试验中自杀事件的预测因素。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;48(10):987-996. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181b5dbe4.
7
A pilot study of telephone care management and structured disease self-management groups for chronic depression.一项针对慢性抑郁症的电话护理管理和结构化疾病自我管理小组的试点研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Aug;58(8):1065-72. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.8.1065.
8
The role of readiness to change in response to treatment of adolescent depression.青少年抑郁症治疗中改变意愿的作用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):422-8. doi: 10.1037/a0014154.
9
Differential effects of treatments for chronic depression: a latent growth model reanalysis.慢性抑郁症治疗方法的差异效果:潜在增长模型再分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):409-19. doi: 10.1037/a0019267.
10
Therapeutic reactance as a predictor of outcome in the treatment of chronic depression.治疗阻抗作为慢性抑郁症治疗结果的预测指标。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):1025-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.1025.

引用本文的文献

1
Is employment status associated with baseline symptoms, engagement, and outcomes in naturalistic psychotherapy? Evaluation in a large community mental health agency.就业状况与自然主义心理治疗中的基线症状、参与度及治疗结果是否相关?在一家大型社区心理健康机构中的评估。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1037/pst0000597.
2
Prognostic and prescriptive predictors of PTSD response to prolonged exposure and sertraline.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)对延长暴露疗法和舍曲林反应的预后及处方预测因素
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jun 23;2:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100008. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Predicting treatment response to cognitive behavior therapy in social anxiety disorder on the basis of demographics, psychiatric history, and scales: A machine learning approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Antidepressant medications v. cognitive therapy in people with depression with or without personality disorder.抗抑郁药物与认知疗法对伴有或不伴有人格障碍的抑郁症患者的疗效比较
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;192(2):124-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037234.
2
Progressive resistance to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor but not to cognitive therapy in the treatment of major depression.在重度抑郁症治疗中对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂产生渐进性耐药,但对认知疗法无耐药。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;75(2):267-76. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.267.
3
Severity and duration of depression, not personality factors, predict short term outcome in the treatment of major depression.
基于人口统计学、精神病史和量表预测社交焦虑障碍认知行为疗法的治疗反应:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0313351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313351. eCollection 2025.
4
Effect of depression and empowerment on medication adherence in patients with breast cancer: a descriptive survey.抑郁和赋权对乳腺癌患者药物依从性的影响:一项描述性调查。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 14;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02680-8.
5
Comparison of crisis response planning and treatment as usual for active duty service members at risk for suicide: Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in a military treatment facility.现役自杀风险军人的危机应对计划与常规治疗比较:军事治疗机构阶梯式楔形整群随机试验的研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Dec 6;42:101407. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101407. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Neural activity during working memory predicts clinical response to computerized executive function training prior to cognitive processing therapy.工作记忆期间的神经活动可预测认知加工治疗前计算机化执行功能训练的临床反应。
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 16;54(16):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724003106.
7
Comorbid anxiety, loneliness, and chronic pain as predictors of intervention outcomes for subclinical depressive symptoms in older adults: evidence from a large community-based study in Hong Kong.焦虑、孤独和慢性疼痛共病与老年人亚临床抑郁症状干预结果的关系:来自香港一项大型社区研究的证据。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06281-2.
8
Predictors of dropout in self-guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: An exploratory study.强迫症自我引导式互联网认知行为疗法中退出治疗的预测因素:一项探索性研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):458-474. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12517. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
9
Dialectical Behavior Therapy as an intervention for Treatment Resistant Depression in adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.辩证行为疗法作为成人治疗抵抗性抑郁症的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0303967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303967. eCollection 2024.
10
What predicts response to sertraline for people with depression in primary care? a secondary data analysis of moderators in the PANDA trial.什么因素可以预测在初级保健中接受舍曲林治疗的抑郁症患者的反应?PANDA 试验中调节因素的二次数据分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300366. eCollection 2024.
抑郁症的严重程度和持续时间而非人格因素可预测重度抑郁症治疗的短期结果。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
4
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效:对临床实践的启示
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
5
Symptom clusters as predictors of late response to antidepressant treatment.症状群作为抗抑郁治疗延迟反应的预测指标。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;66(8):1064-70. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0816.
6
Predictors of partial remission in older patients treated for major depression: the role of comorbid dysthymia.老年重度抑郁症患者部分缓解的预测因素:共病恶劣心境的作用。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;13(8):713-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.8.713.
7
Psychotherapy and medication in the treatment of adult and geriatric depression: which monotherapy or combined treatment?心理治疗与药物治疗在成人及老年抑郁症治疗中的应用:哪种单一疗法或联合治疗?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;66(4):455-68. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0408.
8
Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression.认知疗法与药物治疗对中重度抑郁症复发的预防作用
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):417-22. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.417.
9
Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression.认知疗法与药物治疗中度至重度抑郁症的比较。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):409-16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409.
10
Predictors for 2-year outcome of major depressive episode.重度抑郁发作2年预后的预测因素。
J Affect Disord. 2004 Nov 15;83(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.05.001.