Düsing Rainer, Sellers Felicity
Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Bonn, Germany.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2287-301. doi: 10.1185/03007990903152045.
Clinical trials have shown organ-protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); however, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rates, and decline in renal function remain high. In the ONTARGET trial in patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk, ACE inhibitor/ARB combination therapy provided no significant clinical outcome benefits over monotherapy, and was associated with a worse safety and tolerability profile. These results raise the question of whether ACE inhibitor/ARB, direct renin inhibitor (DRI)/ACE inhibitor and DRI/ARB combinations are of clinical value.
Using PubMed and EMBASE databases, we conducted a systematic review of clinical trials published before June 2008 evaluating dual intervention with ACE inhibitors and ARBs, and compared these with trials of DRI/ACE inhibitor or DRI/ARB combinations.
A total of 70 studies met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. In patients with hypertension, ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations provided limited additional reductions in blood pressure (BP) over monotherapy. Outcomes benefits were unclear: VALIANT and ONTARGET demonstrated no enhanced outcome benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy; Val-HeFT and CHARM-Added showed reduced morbidity/mortality in patients with heart failure, but at the expense of poorer tolerability. Combination therapy with the DRI aliskiren and an ACE inhibitor or ARB provided significant additional BP reductions over monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, and reduced surrogate markers of organ damage in patients with heart failure or diabetic nephropathy, with generally similar safety and tolerability to the component monotherapies. No morbidity and mortality data for DRI/ACE inhibitor or DRI/ARB combinations are currently available.
ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations showed equivocal effects on clinical outcomes. DRI/ACE inhibitor and DRI/ARB combinations reduced markers of organ damage, but longer-term trials are required to establish whether more complete renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system control with aliskiren-based therapy translates into improved outcome benefits.
临床试验已显示血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)具有器官保护作用;然而,心血管疾病的死亡率和发病率以及肾功能下降率仍然很高。在针对心血管疾病高风险的高血压患者进行的ONTARGET试验中,ACE抑制剂/ARB联合治疗相较于单一疗法并未带来显著的临床结局益处,且安全性和耐受性更差。这些结果引发了关于ACE抑制剂/ARB、直接肾素抑制剂(DRI)/ACE抑制剂以及DRI/ARB联合治疗是否具有临床价值的疑问。
我们使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库,对2008年6月之前发表的评估ACE抑制剂和ARB双重干预的临床试验进行了系统综述,并将其与DRI/ACE抑制剂或DRI/ARB联合治疗的试验进行比较。
共有70项研究符合该分析的纳入标准。在高血压患者中,ACE抑制剂/ARB联合治疗相较于单一疗法,血压(BP)额外降低有限。结局益处尚不明确:VALIANT和ONTARGET试验表明联合治疗相较于单一疗法并未增强结局益处;Val-HeFT和CHARM-Added试验显示心力衰竭患者的发病率/死亡率有所降低,但耐受性较差。在轻度至中度高血压患者中,DRI阿利吉仑与ACE抑制剂或ARB联合治疗相较于单一疗法可显著额外降低血压,并且在心力衰竭或糖尿病肾病患者中可降低器官损伤的替代标志物,其安全性和耐受性总体上与单一疗法相似。目前尚无DRI/ACE抑制剂或DRI/ARB联合治疗的发病率和死亡率数据。
ACE抑制剂/ARB联合治疗对临床结局的影响不明确。DRI/ACE抑制剂和DRI/ARB联合治疗可降低器官损伤标志物,但需要进行长期试验以确定基于阿利吉仑的治疗更全面地控制肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统是否能转化为更好的结局益处。