Lee Jung H, Wang Wei, Silva Edward J, Chang Anne-Marie, Scheuermaier Karine D, Cain Sean W, Duffy Jeanne F
Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sleep. 2009 Jul;32(7):905-13. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.7.905.
Performance on many cognitive tasks varies with time awake and with circadian phase, and the forced desynchrony (FD) protocol can be used to separate these influences on performance. Some performance tasks show practice effects, whereas the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) has been reported not to show such effects. We aimed to compare performance on the PVT and on an addition test (ADD) across a 6-week FD study, to determine whether practice effects were present and to analyze the circadian and wake-dependent modulation of the 2 measures.
A 47-day FD study conducted at the Brigham and Women's Hospital General Clinical Research Center.
Eleven healthy adults (mean age: 24.4 years, 2 women).
For 2 baseline days and across 6 weeks of FD, we gave a test battery (ADD, PVT, self-rating of effort and performance) every 2 hours. During FD, there was a significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in ADD performance (more correct calculations completed), whereas PVT performance (mean reaction time, fastest 10% reaction times, lapses) significantly (P < 0.0001) declined week by week. Subjective ratings of PVT performance indicated that subjects felt their performance improved across the study (P < 0.0001), but their rating of whether they could have performed better with greater effort did not change across the study (P > 0.05).
The decline in PVT performance suggests a cumulative effect of sleep loss across the 6-week study. Subjects did not accurately detect their declining PVT performance, and a motivational factor could not explain this decline.
许多认知任务的表现会随清醒时间和昼夜节律阶段而变化,强制去同步化(FD)方案可用于区分这些因素对表现的影响。一些表现任务会显示出练习效应,而据报道精神运动警觉任务(PVT)并未显示出此类效应。我们旨在比较在一项为期6周的FD研究中PVT和附加测试(ADD)的表现,以确定是否存在练习效应,并分析这两种测量方法的昼夜节律和与清醒相关的调节情况。
在布莱根妇女医院综合临床研究中心进行的一项为期47天的FD研究。
11名健康成年人(平均年龄:24.4岁,2名女性)。
在2个基线日以及FD的6周期间,我们每2小时进行一组测试(ADD、PVT、努力程度和表现的自我评分)。在FD期间,ADD表现(完成的正确计算更多)有显著改善(P < 0.0001),而PVT表现(平均反应时间、最快10%反应时间、失误次数)每周都有显著下降(P < 0.0001)。PVT表现的主观评分表明,受试者感觉他们在整个研究过程中的表现有所改善(P < 0.0001),但他们对自己是否可以通过更努力表现得更好的评分在整个研究过程中没有变化(P > 0.05)。
PVT表现的下降表明在为期6周的研究中睡眠不足的累积效应。受试者没有准确察觉到他们PVT表现的下降,并且一个动机因素无法解释这种下降。