• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与参加 2 型糖尿病筛查计划相关的社会经济因素。

Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x
PMID:19646192
Abstract

AIMS

The prevalence of diabetes is increasing, and screening of high-risk populations is recommended. A low attendance rate has been observed in many Type 2 diabetes screening programmes, so that an analysis of factors related to attendance is therefore relevant. This paper analyses the association between socioeconomic factors and attendance for Type 2 diabetes screening.

METHODS

Persons aged 40-69 years (n = 4603) were invited to participate in a stepwise diabetes screening programme performed in general practitioners' offices in the county of Aarhus, Denmark in 2001. The study was population-based and cross-sectional with follow-up. The association between screening attendance in the high-risk population and socioeconomic factors was analysed by odds ratio.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the estimated high-risk population attended the screening programme. In those with known risk for Type 2 diabetes, attenders were more likely to be older, to be unemployed and to live in the countryside than non-attenders. The risk for Type 2 diabetes was unknown for 21% of the study population; this group was younger and less likely to be cohabitant, skilled, or employed and to have middle or high income than the study population with known risk score for diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

A low attendance rate was found in this screening programme for Type 2 diabetes. No substantial socioeconomic difference was found between attenders and non-attenders in the high-risk population. Further research is needed to uncover barriers to screening of Type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically deprived persons.

摘要

目的

糖尿病的患病率正在上升,建议对高危人群进行筛查。许多 2 型糖尿病筛查项目的参与率都很低,因此分析与参与率相关的因素是很有意义的。本文分析了社会经济因素与 2 型糖尿病筛查参与率之间的关系。

方法

2001 年,丹麦奥胡斯县的全科医生办公室开展了一项逐步进行的糖尿病筛查计划,邀请了 40-69 岁的人群参加。该研究是基于人群的横断面研究,具有随访。通过优势比分析高危人群中筛查参与率与社会经济因素之间的关系。

结果

估计高危人群中有 44%参加了筛查计划。在已知有 2 型糖尿病风险的人群中,与未参加者相比,参加者更可能年龄较大、失业和居住在农村地区。对于 21%的研究人群,2 型糖尿病的风险未知;这组人群更年轻,与同居者、熟练工人或就业者以及中等或高收入的可能性较小,而具有已知糖尿病风险评分的研究人群则具有这些特征。

结论

在这项 2 型糖尿病筛查计划中,参与率较低。在高危人群中,参加者和未参加者之间没有明显的社会经济差异。需要进一步研究以揭示在社会经济弱势群体中筛查 2 型糖尿病的障碍。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.与参加 2 型糖尿病筛查计划相关的社会经济因素。
Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x.
2
Are lifestyle changes achieved after participation in a screening programme for Type 2 diabetes? The ADDITION Study, Denmark.参与2型糖尿病筛查项目后生活方式是否会发生改变?丹麦ADDITION研究。
Diabet Med. 2007 Oct;24(10):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02238.x. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
3
Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?半农村地区的佛兰芒女性会被激励去参加有组织的乳腺癌筛查吗?
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999 Apr;47(2):119-27.
4
Low yield of population-based screening for Type 2 diabetes in the Netherlands: the ADDITION Netherlands study.荷兰基于人群的2型糖尿病筛查的低收益:荷兰ADDITION研究
Fam Pract. 2007 Dec;24(6):555-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm052. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
5
Physical, mental and social factors associated with frequent attendance in Danish general practice. A population-based cross-sectional study.丹麦全科医疗中与频繁就诊相关的身体、心理和社会因素。一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(4):813-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.027.
6
Can a screening programme for diabetes be applied to another population?糖尿病筛查项目能否应用于其他人群?
Diabet Med. 2005 Sep;22(9):1234-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01641.x.
7
Regional variations in cancer screening rates found in women with diabetes.女性糖尿病患者的癌症筛查率存在地域差异。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3bd07.
8
The level and determinants of diabetes knowledge in Kuwaiti adults with type 2 diabetes.科威特2型糖尿病成年患者的糖尿病知识水平及其决定因素。
Diabetes Metab. 2009 Apr;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
9
Diabetes retinopathy screening: audit of equity in participation and selected outcomes in South East London.糖尿病视网膜病变筛查:伦敦东南部参与情况及选定结果的公平性审计
J Med Screen. 2006;13(3):152-5. doi: 10.1258/096914106778440608.
10
Payment and attendance at general practice preventive health examinations.
Fam Med. 1995 Sep;27(8):531-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and motives of non-responders in a stepwise cardiometabolic disease prevention program in primary care.在初级保健中进行逐步代谢疾病预防计划中不响应者的特征和动机。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;31(5):991-996. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab060.
2
Unwillingness to participate in health checks for cardiometabolic diseases: A survey among primary health care patients in five European countries.不愿参与心血管代谢疾病健康检查:一项针对五个欧洲国家初级医疗保健患者的调查。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;4(2):e256. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.256. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.
在初级保健中参与心血管代谢疾病健康检查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(12):1326-1340. doi: 10.1177/2047487318780751. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Gender disparities in the associations of behavioral factors, serious psychological distress and chronic diseases with type 2 diabetes screening among US adults.美国成年人中行为因素、严重心理困扰及慢性病与2型糖尿病筛查之间关联的性别差异。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2018 Apr 3;3:9. doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0065-z. eCollection 2018.
5
The impact of a point-of-care testing device on CVD risk assessment completion in New Zealand primary-care practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial and qualitative investigation.即时检验设备对新西兰初级医疗实践中心血管疾病风险评估完成情况的影响:一项整群随机对照试验和定性调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0174504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174504. eCollection 2017.
6
Patterns of attendance to health checks in a municipality setting: the Danish 'Check Your Health Preventive Program'.市政环境下健康检查的参与模式:丹麦“检查你的健康预防计划”
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 21;5:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.011. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Psychological distress, cardiovascular complications and mortality among people with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: follow-up of the ADDITION-Denmark trial.筛查发现的 2 型糖尿病患者的心理困扰、心血管并发症和死亡率:ADDITION-Denmark 试验的随访。
Diabetologia. 2014 Apr;57(4):710-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3165-4. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
8
Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.一般实践中不参与基于人群的疾病预防计划。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 9;12:856. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-856.
9
The influence of non-response in a population-based cohort study on type 2 diabetes evaluated by the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.基于瑞典处方药物登记处评估的 2 型糖尿病人群为基础队列研究中的无应答影响。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;27(3):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9630-1. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
10
General practitioners' adherence to guidelines on management of dyslipidaemia: ADDITION-Denmark.丹麦 ADDITION 研究:基层医生对血脂异常管理指南的遵循情况。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):47-54. doi: 10.3109/02813430903335216.