Kruse Gina Rae, Barbour Russell, Heimer Robert, Shaboltas Alla V, Toussova Olga V, Hoffman Irving F, Kozlov Andrei P
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health and the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, CT, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2009 Jul 31;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-6-22.
The HIV epidemic in Russia has been driven by the unsafe injection of drugs, predominantly heroin and the ephedrine derived psychostimulants. Understanding differences in HIV risk behaviors among injectors associated with different substances has important implications for prevention programs.
We examined behaviors associated with HIV risk among 900 IDUs who inject heroin, psychostimulants, or multiple substances in 2002. Study participants completed screening questionnaires that provided data on sociodemographics, drug use, place of residence and injection- and sex-related HIV risk behaviors. HIV testing was performed and prevalence was modeled using general estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Individuals were clustered by neighborhood and disaggregated into three drug use categories: Heroin Only Users, Stimulant Only Users, and Mixed Drug Users.
Among Heroin Only Users, younger age, front/backloading of syringes, sharing cotton and cookers were all significant predictors of HIV infection. In contrast, sharing needles and rinse water were significant among the Stimulant Only Users. The Mixed Drug Use group was similar to the Heroin Only Users with age, front/back loading, and sharing cotton significantly associated with HIV infection. These differences became apparent only when neighborhood of residence was included in models run using GEE.
The type of drug injected was associated with distinct behavioral risks. Risks specific to Stimulant Only Users appeared related to direct syringe sharing. The risks specific to the other two groups are common to the process of sharing drugs in preparation to injecting. Across the board, IDUs could profit from prevention education that emphasizes both access to clean syringes and preparing and apportioning drug with these clean syringes. However, attention to neighborhood differences might improve the intervention impact for injectors who favor different drugs.
俄罗斯的艾滋病疫情是由不安全注射毒品所致,主要是海洛因和麻黄碱衍生的精神兴奋剂。了解与不同物质相关的注射吸毒者中艾滋病病毒风险行为的差异对预防项目具有重要意义。
我们调查了2002年900名注射海洛因、精神兴奋剂或多种物质的注射吸毒者中与艾滋病病毒风险相关的行为。研究参与者完成了筛查问卷,提供了社会人口统计学、吸毒情况、居住地点以及与注射和性行为相关的艾滋病病毒风险行为的数据。进行了艾滋病病毒检测,并使用广义估计方程(GEE)分析对患病率进行建模。个体按社区聚类,并分为三类吸毒人群:仅使用海洛因者、仅使用兴奋剂者和混合吸毒者。
在仅使用海洛因者中,年龄较小、注射器前后端使用、共用棉花和炊具都是艾滋病病毒感染的重要预测因素。相比之下,共用针头和冲洗水在仅使用兴奋剂者中具有显著意义。混合吸毒组与仅使用海洛因者相似,年龄、注射器前后端使用以及共用棉花与艾滋病病毒感染显著相关。只有在使用GEE运行的模型中纳入居住社区时,这些差异才变得明显。
注射毒品的类型与不同的行为风险相关。仅使用兴奋剂者特有的风险似乎与直接共用注射器有关。其他两组特有的风险在准备注射时共用毒品的过程中较为常见。总体而言,注射吸毒者可以从强调获取清洁注射器以及使用这些清洁注射器准备和分配毒品的预防教育中受益。然而,关注社区差异可能会提高对偏好不同毒品的注射吸毒者的干预效果。