• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本版癌症患者居家照料者反应评估量表(CRA-J)的有效性和可靠性

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale (CRA-J) for community-dwelling cancer patients.

作者信息

Misawa Tomoyo, Miyashita Mitsunori, Kawa Masako, Abe Koji, Abe Mayumi, Nakayama Yasuko, Given Charles W

机构信息

Department of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Oct-Nov;26(5):334-40. doi: 10.1177/1049909109338480. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1177/1049909109338480
PMID:19648575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) among caregivers of community-dwelling advanced cancer patients in Japan.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to advanced cancer patients and their caregivers who were cared for at day hospices and home palliative care services. We translated the CRA into Japanese, and then verified factor validity, reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, and known groups' validity. To address construct and concurrent validity, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficient between the Japanese version of the CRA and the Burden Index of Caregivers (BIC). To address known groups' validity, we used the t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

A total of 57 caregivers participated in the study. Five factors were extracted (''impact on schedule,'' ''caregiver's self-esteem,'' ''lack of family support,'' ''impact on health,'' and ''impact on finances'') and reliability was good. Construct and concurrent validity among the subscales of the BIC were good. Regarding known groups validity, the subscale score of ''impact on schedule'' for the groups that cared 6 hours or more per day was higher than the other group (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The CRA-J is valid and reliable. This scale is useful for caregivers of cancer patients in Japan.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证日本社区晚期癌症患者照料者的照料者反应评估量表(CRA)。

方法

对日间临终关怀机构和居家姑息治疗服务机构照料的晚期癌症患者及其照料者进行横断面问卷调查。我们将CRA翻译成日语,然后验证其因子效度、信度、结构效度、同时效度和已知群体效度。为了验证结构效度和同时效度,我们计算了日语版CRA与照料者负担指数(BIC)之间的皮尔逊相关系数。为了验证已知群体效度,我们使用了t检验或方差分析(ANOVA)。

结果

共有57名照料者参与了本研究。提取了五个因子(“对日程安排的影响”、“照料者的自尊”、“缺乏家庭支持”、“对健康的影响”和“对财务的影响”),且信度良好。BIC各子量表的结构效度和同时效度良好。关于已知群体效度,每天照料6小时或更长时间的组在“对日程安排的影响”子量表得分高于另一组(P = 0.04)。

结论

日语版CRA有效且可靠。该量表对日本癌症患者的照料者有用。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale (CRA-J) for community-dwelling cancer patients.日本版癌症患者居家照料者反应评估量表(CRA-J)的有效性和可靠性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Oct-Nov;26(5):334-40. doi: 10.1177/1049909109338480. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
2
[Caregiver burden in dementia: evaluation with a Japanese version of the Zarit caregiver burden interview].[痴呆症中的照顾者负担:使用日语版的 Zarit 照顾者负担访谈进行评估]
No To Shinkei. 1998 Jun;50(6):561-7.
3
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
4
Reliability and validity of the caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale in Turkish cancer caregivers.土耳其癌症照护者生活质量指数-癌症(CQOLC)量表的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(21):3003-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02915.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
5
Validity and reliability of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale among primary informal caregivers for older persons in Singapore.新加坡老年人主要非专业照护者照顾者反应评估量表的有效性和可靠性。
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(8):1004-15. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.702728. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
6
The caregiver reaction assessment: psychometrics, and temporal stability in primary caregivers of Norwegian cancer patients in late palliative phase.照顾者反应评估:挪威癌症晚期姑息治疗阶段患者的主要照顾者的心理测量学及时间稳定性
Psychooncology. 2006 Jun;15(6):517-27. doi: 10.1002/pon.987.
7
Validation of 'personal strain' and 'role strain': subscales of the short version of the Japanese version of the Zarit Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8).“个人压力”和“角色压力”的验证:日本版 Zarit 负担访谈简版(J-ZBI_8)的子量表
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Dec;58(6):606-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01310.x.
8
Psychometric testing of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer on a Taiwanese family caregiver sample.针对台湾家庭照顾者样本进行照顾者生活质量指数-癌症的心理测量测试。
Cancer Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;32(3):220-9. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5ae8.
9
Development of a 32-item scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.开发一个32项量表以评估上消化道癌切除术后的功能障碍。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1440-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02179.x.
10
Primary caregivers of cancer patients in the palliative phase: a path analysis of variables influencing their burden.姑息治疗阶段癌症患者的主要照护者:影响其负担的变量的路径分析
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(9):2429-39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.008. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Caregiving Appraisal by Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure - A Cross-Sectional Study.心力衰竭患者照顾者的照顾评估相关因素——一项横断面研究
Circ Rep. 2025 Jun 21;7(8):619-626. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0109. eCollection 2025 Aug 8.
2
A short form tool for clinical assessment of caregivers' reaction.一种用于临床评估照顾者反应的简短工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 12;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01844-w.
3
Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review.
支持家庭照顾者的自我评估工具:一项综合综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1016. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101016.
4
Development of a short form of the Japanese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA-J-10) among informal caregivers of older adults.老年非正式照料者中日本版照料者反应评估量表简版(CRA-J-10)的编制
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Mar;24(3):290-296. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14824. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
5
Economic Impacts and Quality of Life for Caregivers of Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Cross-Sectional Japanese Study.视网膜色素变性患者照料者的经济影响及生活质量:一项日本横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(7):988. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070988.
6
Association between Family Caregivers' Satisfaction with Care for Terminal Cancer Patients and Quality of Life of the Bereaved Family: A Prospective Pre- and Postloss Study.临终癌症患者家属照护满意度与丧亲家庭生活质量的相关性:前瞻性预丧亲和丧后研究。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;25(1):81-88. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0043. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Measuring the Burden on Family Caregivers of People With Cancer: Cross-cultural Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment-Indonesian Version.测量癌症患者家属的负担:照顾者反应评估-印度尼西亚版的跨文化翻译和心理测量测试。
Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000733.
8
A scoping review of caregiver burden during allogeneic HSCT: lessons learned and future directions.异基因造血干细胞移植期间照顾者负担的范围综述:经验教训与未来方向
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Nov;51(11):1416-1422. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.164. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
9
Providing care to relatives with mental illness: reactions and distress among primary informal caregivers.为患有精神疾病的亲属提供照料:主要非正式照料者的反应与困扰
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 25;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0786-9.
10
[Evaluation of the German version of the caregiver reaction assessment questionnaire for informal caregivers of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration].[针对新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的非专业照护者的照护者反应评估问卷德文版的评估]
Ophthalmologe. 2016 Mar;113(3):230-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0135-2.