• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:中国一家机构对126例患者进行至少3年随访的肿瘤学及功能学结果

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results of 126 patients with a minimum 3-year follow-up at a single Chinese institute.

作者信息

Gao Xin, Zhou Jian-Hua, Li Liao-Yuan, Qiu Jian-Guang, Pu Xiao-Yong

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2009 Sep;11(5):548-56. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.42. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1038/aja.2009.42
PMID:19648935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3735014/
Abstract

In this study we evaluate the oncological and functional results of the largest cohort of patients in China treated by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and with at least 3 years of follow-up. 126 inconsecutive patients (range 56-78 years, median 62.5) who had an LRP were retrospectively analyzed. The mean prostate specific antigen level and Gleason score was 13.4 ng mL(-1) and 6.4, respectively. Twenty-seven patients had unilateral or bilateral nerve preservation and 29 had pelvic lymphadenectomy. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for differences in clinical and pathological features when comparing the risk for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Urinary continence was assessed by incontinence questionnaire and erectile function by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men score. The mean operative duration was 250 min and blood loss 354 mL. Five patients received blood transfusion and nine had complications, including rectal injury (two), ureteral injury (one), active bleeding (one), bladder neck stenosis (two), paralytic ileus (one), subcutaneous hematoma (one) and port-site hernia (one). The overall positive surgical margin rate was 20.6% and correlated with pathological stage and Gleason score respectively (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 respectively). All patients had >or= 3 years of follow-up (range 3-6.75 years, mean 4.6, median 4.75). At 3 years of follow-up, the overall survival rate was 100% and the bPFS was 81.0% in all patients; 124 patients (98.4%) were continent; 22 of 27 patients (81.5%) who underwent nerve preservation retained erectile function. Our series confirms that LRP is an effective, safe and precise technique at Chinese institution.

摘要

在本研究中,我们评估了中国接受腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)且至少随访3年的最大患者队列的肿瘤学和功能结果。对126例接受LRP的非连续患者(年龄范围56 - 78岁,中位年龄62.5岁)进行了回顾性分析。前列腺特异性抗原水平和Gleason评分的平均值分别为13.4 ng/mL和6.4。27例患者进行了单侧或双侧神经保留,29例患者进行了盆腔淋巴结清扫术。在比较无生化进展生存(bPFS)风险时,采用多变量分析来调整临床和病理特征的差异。通过失禁问卷评估尿失禁情况,通过男性性健康量表评分评估勃起功能。平均手术时间为250分钟,失血量为354毫升。5例患者接受了输血,9例患者出现并发症,包括直肠损伤(2例)、输尿管损伤(1例)、活动性出血(1例)、膀胱颈狭窄(2例)、麻痹性肠梗阻(1例)、皮下血肿(1例)和切口疝(1例)。总体手术切缘阳性率为20.6%,分别与病理分期和Gleason评分相关(P = 0.03,P < 0.001)。所有患者的随访时间均≥3年(范围3 - 6.75年,平均4.6年,中位4.75年)。在随访3年时,所有患者的总生存率为100%,bPFS为81.0%;124例患者(98.4%)尿控良好;27例接受神经保留的患者中有22例(81.5%)保留了勃起功能。我们的系列研究证实,LRP在中国机构是一种有效、安全且精确的技术。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results of 126 patients with a minimum 3-year follow-up at a single Chinese institute.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:中国一家机构对126例患者进行至少3年随访的肿瘤学及功能学结果
Asian J Androl. 2009 Sep;11(5):548-56. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.42. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: minimum 3-year follow-up of the first 100 patients in the UK.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:英国首批100例患者至少3年的随访
BJU Int. 2006 May;97(5):981-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06090.x.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:英国首批病例系列
BJU Int. 2002 Dec;90(9):876-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.03049.x.
4
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
Evaluating the Oncological and Functional Outcomes in 167 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Could Laparoscopy Still be a Viable Option in Suitable Patients?评估 167 例行腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术患者的肿瘤学和功能结局:腹腔镜在合适的患者中仍然是可行的选择吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Jan;34(1):19-24. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0337. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术——加拿大一家医疗机构200例连续病例的结果
Can J Urol. 2004 Apr;11(2):2172-85.
7
Single-port transvesical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer: technique and outcomes.经单孔经膀胱腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性前列腺癌:技术与疗效。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):944-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.12225. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
8
Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.腹腔镜与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:单机构病例对照研究
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Jun;82(2):109-12.
9
Minimum 5-year follow-up of 1138 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.对1138例连续接受腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行了至少5年的随访。
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):546-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.12887.
10
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of Rectal Injury After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺癌根治术后直肠损伤的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 4;52:85-99. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.017. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Outcomes of radical prostatectomy in a 20-year localized prostate cancer single institution series in China.中国 20 年单机构局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的结果。
Asian J Androl. 2023 May-Jun;25(3):345-349. doi: 10.4103/aja202264.
3
Continuous suture of a single absorbable suture: a new simplified vesicourethral anastomosis technique in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.单根可吸收缝线连续缝合:腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中一种新的简化膀胱尿道吻合技术。
Int Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;99(5):656-61. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00124.1.
4
Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score.使用前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发风险预测模型。
Asian J Androl. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):897-901. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129940.
5
Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.年轻患者在高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的生化结局较差。
Asian J Androl. 2011 Sep;13(5):719-23. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.39. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
6
Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.单中心研究比较标准的顶端解剖与改良技术,以促进腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的膀胱-尿道吻合。
Asian J Androl. 2011 May;13(3):494-8. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.110. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的结果。
Asian J Androl. 2009 Jan;11(1):94-9. doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.10. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
2
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.欧洲泌尿外科学会前列腺癌指南。
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
3
Oncological outcome of laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Int J Urol. 2007 Jun;14(6):515-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01773.x.
4
Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.3个月与8个月新辅助激素治疗对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结局影响的比较研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug;133(8):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0204-2. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
5
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of comparative studies.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:比较研究的系统评价
J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2011-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00265-5.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: minimum 3-year follow-up of the first 100 patients in the UK.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:英国首批100例患者至少3年的随访
BJU Int. 2006 May;97(5):981-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06090.x.
7
Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的术中和围手术期结果比较:一项前瞻性、随机、单术者研究的结果
Eur Urol. 2006 Jul;50(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.051. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
8
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:手术质量的批判性分析
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
9
Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results.腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术——结果的批判性分析
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):612-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.054. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
Management of prostate cancer in China: a multicenter report of 6 institutions.中国前列腺癌的管理:6家机构的多中心报告
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1794-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176817.46279.93.