• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器人导管导航与手动导航和消融治疗心房颤动的比较:单中心经验。

Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: single-center experience.

机构信息

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01570.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01570.x
PMID:19656244
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic catheter navigation and ablation either with magnetic catheter driving or with electromechanical guidance have emerged in the recent years for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare our center's experience of atrial fibrillation ablation using the Hansen Robotic Medical System with our current manual ablation technique in terms of acute and chronic success, as well as procedure time and radiation exposure to both the patient and the operator.

METHODS

A total of 390 consecutive patients with symptomatic and drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (289 males, 62 +/- 11 years) were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent the procedure either with conventional manual ablation (group 1, n = 197) or with the robotic navigation system (RNS) (group 2, n = 193).

RESULTS

The success rate for RNS was 85% (164 patients), while for manual ablation it was 81% (159 patients) (p = 0.264) at 14.1 +/- 1.3 months with AADs previously ineffective. Fluoroscopy time was significantly lower for RNS (48.9 +/- 24.6 minutes for RNS vs. 58.4 +/- 20.1 minutes for manual ablation, P < 0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time was statistically reduced after 50 procedures (61.8 +/- 23.2 minutes for first 50 cases vs. 44.5 +/- 23.6 minutes for subsequent procedures, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Robotic navigation and ablation of atrial fibrillation is safe and effective. Fluoroscopy time decreases with experience.

摘要

背景

近年来,出现了使用磁导管驱动或机电引导的机器人导管导航和消融技术,用于治疗心房颤动。

目的

本研究旨在比较我们中心使用 Hansen 机器人医疗系统进行心房颤动消融的经验与我们目前的手动消融技术在急性和慢性成功率方面的差异,以及手术时间和患者及术者的辐射暴露。

方法

共前瞻性纳入 390 例有症状且药物难治性心房颤动患者(289 例男性,62±11 岁)。所有患者均接受常规手动消融(组 1,n=197)或机器人导航系统(RNS)消融(组 2,n=193)。

结果

RNS 的成功率为 85%(164 例),而手动消融的成功率为 81%(159 例)(p=0.264),在使用之前无效的抗心律失常药物后 14.1±1.3 个月。RNS 的透视时间明显更短(RNS 为 48.9±24.6 分钟,手动消融为 58.4±20.1 分钟,P<0.001)。在进行 50 例手术之后,平均透视时间呈统计学降低(前 50 例为 61.8±23.2 分钟,后 50 例为 44.5±23.6 分钟,P<0.0001)。

结论

机器人导航和消融心房颤动是安全有效的。透视时间随经验的增加而减少。

相似文献

1
Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: single-center experience.利用机器人导管导航与手动导航和消融治疗心房颤动的比较:单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1328-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01570.x.
2
Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.阵发性心房颤动导管消融的机器人导航早期经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S163-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02277.x.
3
Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation.房颤消融术中减少透视:机器人引导导航的益处。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jan;21(1):6-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01592.x. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
4
Study design of the man and machine trial: a prospective international controlled noninferiority trial comparing manual with robotic catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation.研究设计:一项前瞻性国际对照非劣效试验,比较手动与机器人导管消融治疗心房颤动的疗效。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02418.x. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
5
Experience matters: long-term results of pulmonary vein isolation using a robotic navigation system for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.经验很重要:使用机器人导航系统进行肺静脉隔离治疗阵发性心房颤动的长期结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Feb;105(2):106-16. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0892-6. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data.远程与传统导航在心房颤动导管消融中的比较:前瞻性注册数据的见解。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):298-308. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1356-6. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.使用新型三维非透视导航系统行遥控磁肺静脉隔离:单中心前瞻性研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Aug-Sep;106(8-9):423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
Robotic navigation and ablation.机器人导航与消融
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2010 Dec;58(6):691-9.
9
Initial experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.阵发性和持续性心房颤动导管消融的机器人导航初步经验。
J Electrocardiol. 2012 Mar;45(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Reduction of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, and controlled study.使用新型透视影像集成三维电解剖标测系统减少心房颤动消融术中的辐射暴露:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Sep;12(9):1945-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Source Localization and Classification of Pulmonary Valve-Originated Electrocardiograms Using Volume Conductor Modeling with Anatomical Models.使用容积导体建模和解剖模型进行肺动脉瓣起源心电图的源定位和分类。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;14(10):513. doi: 10.3390/bios14100513.
2
Contact Stability Analysis of Magnetically-Actuated Robotic Catheter Under Surface Motion.表面运动下磁驱动机器人导管的接触稳定性分析
IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2020 May-Aug;2020:4455-4462. doi: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196951. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Analysis of Contact Stability and Contact Safety of a Robotic Intravascular Cardiac Catheter under Blood Flow Disturbances.
血流扰动下机器人血管内心脏导管的接触稳定性和接触安全性分析
Rep U S. 2020 Oct;2020:3216-3223. doi: 10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341527. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Contact Stability and Contact Safety of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Robotic Catheter Under Heart Surface Motion.磁共振成像引导的机器人导管在心脏表面运动下的接触稳定性和接触安全性
J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2021 Jul 1;143(7):071010. doi: 10.1115/1.4049837. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Real-time optical spectroscopic monitoring of nonirrigated lesion progression within atrial and ventricular tissues.实时光学光谱监测无灌流心房间质和室质病灶进展。
J Biophotonics. 2019 Apr;12(4):e201800144. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800144. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
6
A linear stepping endovascular intervention robot with variable stiffness and force sensing.一种具有可变刚度和力感知的线性步进式血管内介入机器人。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 May;13(5):671-682. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1722-x. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.心房颤动患者组织损伤和消融结果的差异——手动导管与机器人导管对比
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Aug 31;6(2):785. doi: 10.4022/jafib.785. eCollection 2013 Aug-Sep.
8
Role of Remote Navigation Systems in AF Ablation.远程导航系统在房颤消融中的作用。
J Atr Fibrillation. 2011 Feb 22;3(5):298. doi: 10.4022/jafib.298. eCollection 2011 Feb-Apr.
9
Ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia using zero-fluoroscopy approach with equivalent efficacy and less fatigue: A multicenter comparative study.采用零透视方法消融特发性室性心律失常的疗效相当且疲劳感减轻:一项多中心比较研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(6):e6080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006080.
10
Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动导管消融术中透视时间及辐射剂量的降低
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 Aug;5(2):144-9. doi: 10.15420/AER.2016.16.2.