Suppr超能文献

使用日本矫形外科学会腰痛评分和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日文版对腰痛患者进行评估的差异。

Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

作者信息

Nakamura Masao, Miyamoto Kei, Shimizu Katsuji

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mino Municipal Hospital, Mino, Gifu, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2009 Jul;14(4):367-73. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1348-5. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of patients suffering from degenerative diseases in the lumbar spine is increasing in Japan. Although various scales to measure disability or quality of life in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases are currently available, it has been shown that one questionnaire is not always compatible with another. Our purpose is to evaluate the association and differences between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for low back pain.

METHODS

These two scales were examined and compared using data from 602 patients with low back pain and/or lumbar disease. The associations between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and each subscale in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in back pain dominant group and leg pain dominant group, and with respect to six pathological conditions (i.e., sciatica, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal canal stenosis, muscular pain, traumatic pain) were analyzed.

RESULTS

While the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Subjective and Activities of daily living (ADL) subscale of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score showed a good correlation (r > 0.60), the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Clinical subscale showed a weak correlation (r = 0.35). Among the six pathological conditions, the correlation between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was the lowest (r = 0.66) in the lumbar spinal canal stenosis category.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical signs in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases are not associated closely with the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Therefore, a combination of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score can provide wide-ranging assessment of the level of impairment in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases.

摘要

背景

在日本,患有腰椎退行性疾病的患者数量正在增加。尽管目前有各种用于测量腰痛和/或腰椎疾病患者残疾程度或生活质量的量表,但已表明一种问卷并不总是与另一种兼容。我们的目的是评估罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与日本骨科协会腰痛评分之间的关联和差异。

方法

使用来自602例腰痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的数据对这两种量表进行检查和比较。分析了罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与日本骨科协会腰痛评分中背痛为主组和腿痛为主组的各子量表之间的关联,以及与六种病理状况(即坐骨神经痛、脊椎病、脊椎滑脱、腰椎管狭窄、肌肉疼痛、创伤性疼痛)的关联。

结果

虽然罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与日本骨科协会评分的主观及日常生活活动(ADL)子量表显示出良好的相关性(r>0.60),但罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与临床子量表显示出较弱的相关性(r = 0.35)。在六种病理状况中,罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与日本骨科协会评分之间的相关性在腰椎管狭窄类别中最低(r = 0.66)。

结论

腰痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的临床体征与罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版没有密切关联。因此,罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷日语版与日本骨科协会评分相结合可以对腰痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的损伤程度进行广泛评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验