Hall Edward F, Scott Garrett R, Musch David C, Zacks David N
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical School.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;2(1):139-45. doi: 10.2147/opth.s2128.
Controversy exists regarding the use of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) as an anti-inflammatory adjunct to intravitreal antibiotics in patients with acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. The purpose of this project was to evaluate our experience regarding the effect of adjunctive IVD use on visual outcomes in such patients.
Retrospective, comparative case series.
Patients treated for acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery from 1995-2004.
In addition to standard intravitreal antibiotic treatment, some patients also received a single adjunctive injection of IVD.
Median visual acuity at last follow-up and percentage of patients achieving a >/=3-line improvement in visual acuity.
Inflammatory index scoring, including amount of cell and flare, height of hypopyon, and presence of fibrin as a function of time after treatment.
Twenty-six eyes were treated with and 38 eyes without adjunctive IVD. Median presenting visual acuity was Hand Motion in both groups. Median visual acuity at last follow-up measured 20/40 in the IVD group and 20/50 in the No-IVD group (p = 0.75). Seventy-three percent of patients in the IVD group and 82% of patients in the No-IVD group achieved a >/=3-line improvement in visual acuity (p = 0.42). No significant difference was detected between the IVD and No-IVD groups for any of the three measures of inflammation.
The use of IVD did not significantly improve the final median visual acuity, the chance of achieving a >/=3-line improvement in visual acuity, or the amount of intraocular inflammation. Based on these findings, and the possible detrimental effect of IVD on visual outcomes previously reported in the literature, the use of IVD does not appear to be warranted as a routine adjunctive treatment in postoperative endophthalmitis.
对于在白内障手术后发生急性眼内炎的患者中,玻璃体内注射地塞米松(IVD)作为玻璃体内注射抗生素的抗炎辅助用药,目前仍存在争议。本项目的目的是评估我们在这类患者中使用辅助性IVD对视力预后影响的经验。
回顾性、比较性病例系列研究。
1995年至2004年期间接受白内障手术后急性眼内炎治疗的患者。
除了标准的玻璃体内抗生素治疗外,部分患者还接受了单次辅助性IVD注射。
最后一次随访时的中位视力,以及视力提高≥3行的患者百分比。
炎症指数评分,包括细胞和闪光量、前房积脓高度以及治疗后不同时间的纤维蛋白存在情况。
26只眼接受了辅助性IVD治疗,38只眼未接受。两组患者的初始中位视力均为手动。IVD组最后一次随访时的中位视力为20/40,非IVD组为20/50(p = 0.75)。IVD组73%的患者和非IVD组82%的患者视力提高≥3行(p = 0.42)。在炎症的三项指标中,IVD组和非IVD组之间均未检测到显著差异。
使用IVD并未显著提高最终中位视力、视力提高≥3行的几率或眼内炎症程度。基于这些发现,以及先前文献报道的IVD对视力预后可能的有害影响,在术后眼内炎中,使用IVD作为常规辅助治疗似乎并无必要。