GI and Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Almansoura Faculty of Medicine, Almansoura University, Almansoura, 35516, Egypt,
Hepatol Int. 2009 Jun;3(2):323-33. doi: 10.1007/s12072-008-9114-x. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
Liver fibrosis is a common pathway leading to cirrhosis, which is the final result of injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Liver biopsy has been considered to be the "gold standard" to assess fibrosis. However, liver biopsy being invasive and, in many instances, not favored by patients or physicians, alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis have assumed great importance. Moreover, therapies aimed at reversing the liver fibrosis have also been tried lately with variable results. Till now, there has been no consensus on various clinical, pathological, and radiological aspects of liver fibrosis. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved the following: review of all available published literature by a core group of experts; proposal of consensus statements by the experts; discussion of the contentious issues; and unanimous approval of the consensus statements after discussion. The Oxford System of evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The consensus statements are presented in this review.
肝纤维化是导致肝硬化的常见途径,肝硬化是肝脏损伤的最终结果。准确评估纤维化程度在临床上很重要,特别是在出现旨在逆转纤维化的治疗方法时。肝活检被认为是评估纤维化的“金标准”。然而,由于肝活检具有侵入性,且在许多情况下不受患者或医生的青睐,因此评估肝纤维化的替代方法变得非常重要。此外,最近也尝试了旨在逆转肝纤维化的治疗方法,但结果各不相同。到目前为止,肝纤维化在临床、病理和影像学等各个方面还没有达成共识。亚太肝病学会于 2007 年成立了肝纤维化工作组,负责制定与亚太地区疾病模式和临床实践相关的肝纤维化各个方面的共识指南。这些共识指南的制定过程包括以下步骤:核心专家组对所有现有发表文献进行审查;专家提出共识声明;讨论有争议的问题;经过讨论后一致批准共识声明。采用牛津循证医学方法系统,根据证据水平从 1(最高)到 5(最低)和推荐等级从 A(最强)到 D(最弱)制定共识声明。本综述介绍了这些共识声明。